Usefulness of Automated Analysis System for Microvascular Blood Flow Rate Using Magnifying Endoscopy in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (With Video).

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yoichi Akazawa, Hiroya Ueyama, Shunsuke Nakamura, Yasuko Uemura, Tomoyo Iwano, Momoko Yamamoto, Hisanori Utsunomiya, Ryota Uchida, Daiki Abe, Shotaro Oki, Nobuyuki Suzuki, Atsushi Ikeda, Tsutomu Takeda, Kumiko Ueda, Mariko Hojo, Naoto Iwai, Osamu Dohi, Takehiro Iwasaki, Kunihisa Uchita, Shuko Nojiri, Takashi Yao, Akihito Nagahara
{"title":"Usefulness of Automated Analysis System for Microvascular Blood Flow Rate Using Magnifying Endoscopy in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (With Video).","authors":"Yoichi Akazawa, Hiroya Ueyama, Shunsuke Nakamura, Yasuko Uemura, Tomoyo Iwano, Momoko Yamamoto, Hisanori Utsunomiya, Ryota Uchida, Daiki Abe, Shotaro Oki, Nobuyuki Suzuki, Atsushi Ikeda, Tsutomu Takeda, Kumiko Ueda, Mariko Hojo, Naoto Iwai, Osamu Dohi, Takehiro Iwasaki, Kunihisa Uchita, Shuko Nojiri, Takashi Yao, Akihito Nagahara","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Early gastric cancer (EGC) diagnosis after Helicobacter pylori eradication and differentiation from patchy redness (PR) remains challenging. We developed a novel automated analysis system for microvascular blood flow rate using magnifying endoscopy. This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in differentiating EGC from PR compared with endoscopists in a multicenter setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 76 magnifying endoscopy videos, including 36 EGCs and 40 PRs recorded at our institution. Lesions were diagnosed as cancer (EGC) or noncancer (PR) by the analysis system, based on the cut-off value calculated from the validation data set. Additionally, 30 endoscopists (15 experts and 15 trainees) from three institutions, all skilled in magnifying endoscopy diagnosis, participated. We compared the diagnostic performance between the analysis system and endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) were 84.2%, 86.1%, 82.5%, 81.6%, and 86.8%, respectively, for the analysis system, and 84.2%, 80.2%, 87.3%, 83.2%, and 84.9%, respectively, for the endoscopists. Sensitivity and NPV of the analysis system tended to be higher than those of endoscopists. Additionally, the accuracy of the analysis system was comparable to that of all endoscopists and tended to be superior to that of trainees (84.2% [95% CI: 74.0%-91.6%] vs. 81.7% [95% CI: 79.4%-83.8%], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The automated analysis system for microvascular blood flow rate showed diagnostic performance equivalent to or superior to that of endoscopists skilled in magnifying endoscopy, suggesting its utility as a new diagnostic modality for differentiating EGC and PR in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Early gastric cancer (EGC) diagnosis after Helicobacter pylori eradication and differentiation from patchy redness (PR) remains challenging. We developed a novel automated analysis system for microvascular blood flow rate using magnifying endoscopy. This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in differentiating EGC from PR compared with endoscopists in a multicenter setting.

Methods: We analyzed 76 magnifying endoscopy videos, including 36 EGCs and 40 PRs recorded at our institution. Lesions were diagnosed as cancer (EGC) or noncancer (PR) by the analysis system, based on the cut-off value calculated from the validation data set. Additionally, 30 endoscopists (15 experts and 15 trainees) from three institutions, all skilled in magnifying endoscopy diagnosis, participated. We compared the diagnostic performance between the analysis system and endoscopists.

Results: Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) were 84.2%, 86.1%, 82.5%, 81.6%, and 86.8%, respectively, for the analysis system, and 84.2%, 80.2%, 87.3%, 83.2%, and 84.9%, respectively, for the endoscopists. Sensitivity and NPV of the analysis system tended to be higher than those of endoscopists. Additionally, the accuracy of the analysis system was comparable to that of all endoscopists and tended to be superior to that of trainees (84.2% [95% CI: 74.0%-91.6%] vs. 81.7% [95% CI: 79.4%-83.8%], respectively).

Conclusions: The automated analysis system for microvascular blood flow rate showed diagnostic performance equivalent to or superior to that of endoscopists skilled in magnifying endoscopy, suggesting its utility as a new diagnostic modality for differentiating EGC and PR in clinical practice.

早期胃癌放大内镜下微血管血流速率自动分析系统的有效性:一项多中心回顾性研究(附视频)。
背景与目的:幽门螺杆菌根除后早期胃癌(EGC)的诊断和斑片状红肿(PR)的鉴别仍然具有挑战性。我们开发了一种利用放大内窥镜检测微血管血流速率的新型自动分析系统。本研究评估了其在鉴别EGC和PR方面的诊断性能,并与多中心内镜医师进行了比较。方法:我们分析了76个放大内镜视频,包括36个EGCs和40个pr。根据验证数据集计算的截止值,分析系统将病变诊断为癌(EGC)或非癌(PR)。此外,来自三家机构的30名内窥镜医师(专家15名,培训生15名)均精通放大内窥镜诊断。我们比较了分析系统和内窥镜医师的诊断性能。结果:分析系统的诊断准确率、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为84.2%、86.1%、82.5%、81.6%和86.8%,内窥镜医师的诊断准确率、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为84.2%、80.2%、87.3%、83.2%和84.9%。分析系统的灵敏度和净现值倾向于高于内镜医师。此外,分析系统的准确性与所有内窥镜医师相当,并倾向于优于实习生(分别为84.2% [95% CI: 74.0%-91.6%]和81.7% [95% CI: 79.4%-83.8%])。结论:微血管血流速率自动分析系统的诊断性能等同于或优于内镜放大技术,可作为临床鉴别EGC和PR的一种新的诊断方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信