Real-World Functional and Anatomic Outcomes With Aflibercept 8.0 mg in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Gabriel Castilho S Barbosa, Suraj Bala, Nitesh Mohan, Sunil K Srivastava, Peter K Kaiser, Ananth Sastry, Amy S Babiuch, Jonathan Sears, Katherine E Talcott, Alex Yuan, Aleksandra Rachitskaya, Justis P Ehlers, Andrew P Schachat, Phoebe Lin, Sumit Sharma, Danny A Mammo
{"title":"Real-World Functional and Anatomic Outcomes With Aflibercept 8.0 mg in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema.","authors":"Gabriel Castilho S Barbosa, Suraj Bala, Nitesh Mohan, Sunil K Srivastava, Peter K Kaiser, Ananth Sastry, Amy S Babiuch, Jonathan Sears, Katherine E Talcott, Alex Yuan, Aleksandra Rachitskaya, Justis P Ehlers, Andrew P Schachat, Phoebe Lin, Sumit Sharma, Danny A Mammo","doi":"10.1177/24741264251376918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess clinical outcomes in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients treated with high-dose aflibercept 8.0 mg (HDA), focusing on treatment intervals, anatomic changes, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, single-center study included 67 DME patients (100 eyes) treated at Cole Eye Institute between August 2023 and November 2024. All patients received at least 3 HDA injections, with a true loading dose defined as 3 initial injections given ≤ 5 weeks apart. The primary outcome was proportion of eyes for which minimum ≥ 7-week treatment intervals were maintained. Secondary outcomes included changes in BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), and macular fluid status. <b>Results:</b> Loading dose was completed in 73 eyes (73%) and not completed in 27 eyes (27%). Before HDA injections, 4.0% of eyes were anti-vascular endothelial growth factor naive. Mean (±SD) follow-up was 24.3 ± 5.0 weeks. From baseline to final visit, mean (±SD) CST significantly decreased (from 371.1 ± 134.6 μm to 330.0 ± 121.7 μm; <i>P</i> = .025), while BCVA remained stable (from 62.4 ± 18.8 to 63.5 ± 17.7 ETDRS letters; <i>P</i> = .676). For 32 eyes (32%), ≥ 7-week treatment intervals could not be maintained, with 18 eyes being switched to alternative therapy and 14 eyes requiring < 7-week injection intervals; these eyes had significantly higher baseline CST (<i>P</i> = .045). Persistent macular fluid was observed in 90% of eyes. <b>Conclusion:</b> HDA reduced CST and stabilized BCVA in DME patients. However, remaining challenges include frequent injections and persistent macular fluid, underscoring the chronic, treatment-resistant nature of DME and need for optimized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251376918"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251376918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients treated with high-dose aflibercept 8.0 mg (HDA), focusing on treatment intervals, anatomic changes, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 67 DME patients (100 eyes) treated at Cole Eye Institute between August 2023 and November 2024. All patients received at least 3 HDA injections, with a true loading dose defined as 3 initial injections given ≤ 5 weeks apart. The primary outcome was proportion of eyes for which minimum ≥ 7-week treatment intervals were maintained. Secondary outcomes included changes in BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), and macular fluid status. Results: Loading dose was completed in 73 eyes (73%) and not completed in 27 eyes (27%). Before HDA injections, 4.0% of eyes were anti-vascular endothelial growth factor naive. Mean (±SD) follow-up was 24.3 ± 5.0 weeks. From baseline to final visit, mean (±SD) CST significantly decreased (from 371.1 ± 134.6 μm to 330.0 ± 121.7 μm; P = .025), while BCVA remained stable (from 62.4 ± 18.8 to 63.5 ± 17.7 ETDRS letters; P = .676). For 32 eyes (32%), ≥ 7-week treatment intervals could not be maintained, with 18 eyes being switched to alternative therapy and 14 eyes requiring < 7-week injection intervals; these eyes had significantly higher baseline CST (P = .045). Persistent macular fluid was observed in 90% of eyes. Conclusion: HDA reduced CST and stabilized BCVA in DME patients. However, remaining challenges include frequent injections and persistent macular fluid, underscoring the chronic, treatment-resistant nature of DME and need for optimized treatment strategies.

阿非利赛普8.0 mg治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿患者的实际功能和解剖学结果。
目的:评价大剂量阿伯西普8.0 mg (HDA)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者的临床疗效,重点关注治疗间隔、解剖变化和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。方法:这项回顾性、单中心研究纳入了2023年8月至2024年11月在科尔眼科研究所接受治疗的67例二甲醚患者(100只眼)。所有患者至少接受3次HDA注射,真正的负荷剂量定义为3次初始注射,间隔≤5周。主要结局是维持至少7周治疗间隔的眼睛比例。次要结局包括BCVA、中心亚野厚度(CST)和黄斑液状态的变化。结果:完成加载剂量73眼(73%),未完成加载剂量27眼(27%)。在HDA注射前,4.0%的眼睛是抗血管内皮生长因子初始化的。平均(±SD)随访时间为24.3±5.0周。从基线到末次随访,平均(±SD) CST显著降低(从371.1±134.6 μm降至330.0±121.7 μm, P = 0.025), BCVA保持稳定(从62.4±18.8个ETDRS字母降至63.5±17.7个ETDRS字母,P = 0.676)。32只眼(32%)不能维持≥7周的治疗间隔,其中18只眼转为替代治疗,14只眼需要< 7周的注射间隔;这些眼睛的基线CST明显高于对照组(P = 0.045)。90%的眼睛存在持续性黄斑积液。结论:HDA降低了DME患者的CST,稳定了BCVA。然而,仍然存在的挑战包括频繁注射和持续的黄斑积液,这强调了二甲醚的慢性、耐治疗性和优化治疗策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信