Evaluation of GLP-1 receptor agonists in Obstetrics and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Bruna Benigna Sales Armstrong, Ana Clara Pimenta Servidoni, Giovanna Cristina de Castro Martin, Guilherme Franceschini Machado, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira Amador, Abdelrahman Yousif
{"title":"Evaluation of GLP-1 receptor agonists in Obstetrics and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bruna Benigna Sales Armstrong, Ana Clara Pimenta Servidoni, Giovanna Cristina de Castro Martin, Guilherme Franceschini Machado, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira Amador, Abdelrahman Yousif","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.103046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary endpoint is maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy, labor, and delivery after exposure to GLP-1 receptor agonists.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, including studies published from 2020 to 2025.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Included studies: (1) RCTs or cohorts; (2) exposure to GLP-1 RAs during pregnancy or preconception; (3) control group not exposed to GLP-1 RAs. Excluded studies: (1) without outcomes of interest; (2) lacking data transparency; (3) retracted; (4) abstracts, case reports, reviews; (5) no control group.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>Six studies evaluated GLP-1 RA exposure during preconception or first trimester. Two authors screened studies; a third resolved disagreements. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Meta-analysis pooled continuous outcomes with mean differences and binary outcomes with odds ratios. Heterogeneity was evaluated via Cochrane Q and I². Subgroup analysis focused on first-trimester exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between GLP-1 RA and control group, including fetal growth restriction or small for gestational age (p = 0.12), live births (p = 0.10), major birth defects (p = 0.79), miscarriages (p = 0.41), preterm delivery (p = 0.62); and stillbirths (p = 0.09). GLP-1 RAs were linked to a lower risk of congenital heart defects (p = 0.03), even in the subgroup analysis (p = 0.03), and showed no significant protective effect against gestational diabetes (p = 0.49). In subgroup analysis, there were no notable differences in miscarriage (p = 0.32), major birth defects (p = 0.83) and preterm delivery (p = 0.88); there were fewer live births that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No statistically significant difference was observed between the control and intervention groups. GLP-1 RAs were connected to a lower risk of congenital heart defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"103046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.103046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Primary endpoint is maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy, labor, and delivery after exposure to GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Data sources: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, including studies published from 2020 to 2025.

Study eligibility criteria: Included studies: (1) RCTs or cohorts; (2) exposure to GLP-1 RAs during pregnancy or preconception; (3) control group not exposed to GLP-1 RAs. Excluded studies: (1) without outcomes of interest; (2) lacking data transparency; (3) retracted; (4) abstracts, case reports, reviews; (5) no control group.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Six studies evaluated GLP-1 RA exposure during preconception or first trimester. Two authors screened studies; a third resolved disagreements. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Meta-analysis pooled continuous outcomes with mean differences and binary outcomes with odds ratios. Heterogeneity was evaluated via Cochrane Q and I². Subgroup analysis focused on first-trimester exposure.

Results: No statistically significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between GLP-1 RA and control group, including fetal growth restriction or small for gestational age (p = 0.12), live births (p = 0.10), major birth defects (p = 0.79), miscarriages (p = 0.41), preterm delivery (p = 0.62); and stillbirths (p = 0.09). GLP-1 RAs were linked to a lower risk of congenital heart defects (p = 0.03), even in the subgroup analysis (p = 0.03), and showed no significant protective effect against gestational diabetes (p = 0.49). In subgroup analysis, there were no notable differences in miscarriage (p = 0.32), major birth defects (p = 0.83) and preterm delivery (p = 0.88); there were fewer live births that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).

Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was observed between the control and intervention groups. GLP-1 RAs were connected to a lower risk of congenital heart defects.

评估GLP-1受体激动剂在产科和围产期结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:主要终点是暴露于GLP-1受体激动剂后妊娠、分娩和分娩期间的母体和胎儿并发症。数据来源:对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Central数据库进行系统检索,包括2020年至2025年发表的研究。研究资格标准:纳入研究:(1)随机对照试验或队列;(2)妊娠期或孕前暴露于GLP-1 RAs;(3)未暴露GLP-1 RAs的对照组。排除的研究:(1)没有感兴趣的结果;(2)缺乏数据透明度;(3)收回;(四)摘要、病例报告、综述;(5)无对照组。研究评价和合成方法:六项研究评估了孕前或妊娠早期GLP-1 RA暴露。两位作者筛选了研究;第三个解决了分歧。采用robins - 1和rob2评估偏倚风险。荟萃分析汇集了具有平均差异的连续结果和具有优势比的二元结果。通过Cochrane Q和I²评估异质性。亚组分析侧重于妊娠早期暴露。结果:在妊娠结果没有明显的统计学差异GLP-1 RA和对照组之间,包括胎龄的胎儿生长受限或小(p = 0.12),活产(p = 0.10),主要出生缺陷(p = 0.79),流产(p = 0.41),早产(p = 0.62);和死产(p = 0.09)。即使在亚组分析中(p = 0.03),GLP-1 RAs也与较低的先天性心脏缺陷风险相关(p = 0.03),并且对妊娠糖尿病没有显着的保护作用(p = 0.49)。亚组分析中,流产(p = 0.32)、重大出生缺陷(p = 0.83)、早产(p = 0.88)两组间差异无统计学意义;活产数较少,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.06)。结论:对照组与干预组之间无统计学差异。GLP-1 RAs与先天性心脏缺陷的风险较低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信