Bruna Benigna Sales Armstrong, Ana Clara Pimenta Servidoni, Giovanna Cristina de Castro Martin, Guilherme Franceschini Machado, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira Amador, Abdelrahman Yousif
{"title":"Evaluation of GLP-1 receptor agonists in Obstetrics and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bruna Benigna Sales Armstrong, Ana Clara Pimenta Servidoni, Giovanna Cristina de Castro Martin, Guilherme Franceschini Machado, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira Amador, Abdelrahman Yousif","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.103046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary endpoint is maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy, labor, and delivery after exposure to GLP-1 receptor agonists.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, including studies published from 2020 to 2025.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Included studies: (1) RCTs or cohorts; (2) exposure to GLP-1 RAs during pregnancy or preconception; (3) control group not exposed to GLP-1 RAs. Excluded studies: (1) without outcomes of interest; (2) lacking data transparency; (3) retracted; (4) abstracts, case reports, reviews; (5) no control group.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>Six studies evaluated GLP-1 RA exposure during preconception or first trimester. Two authors screened studies; a third resolved disagreements. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Meta-analysis pooled continuous outcomes with mean differences and binary outcomes with odds ratios. Heterogeneity was evaluated via Cochrane Q and I². Subgroup analysis focused on first-trimester exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between GLP-1 RA and control group, including fetal growth restriction or small for gestational age (p = 0.12), live births (p = 0.10), major birth defects (p = 0.79), miscarriages (p = 0.41), preterm delivery (p = 0.62); and stillbirths (p = 0.09). GLP-1 RAs were linked to a lower risk of congenital heart defects (p = 0.03), even in the subgroup analysis (p = 0.03), and showed no significant protective effect against gestational diabetes (p = 0.49). In subgroup analysis, there were no notable differences in miscarriage (p = 0.32), major birth defects (p = 0.83) and preterm delivery (p = 0.88); there were fewer live births that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No statistically significant difference was observed between the control and intervention groups. GLP-1 RAs were connected to a lower risk of congenital heart defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"103046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.103046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Primary endpoint is maternal and fetal complications during pregnancy, labor, and delivery after exposure to GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Data sources: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, including studies published from 2020 to 2025.
Study eligibility criteria: Included studies: (1) RCTs or cohorts; (2) exposure to GLP-1 RAs during pregnancy or preconception; (3) control group not exposed to GLP-1 RAs. Excluded studies: (1) without outcomes of interest; (2) lacking data transparency; (3) retracted; (4) abstracts, case reports, reviews; (5) no control group.
Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Six studies evaluated GLP-1 RA exposure during preconception or first trimester. Two authors screened studies; a third resolved disagreements. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Meta-analysis pooled continuous outcomes with mean differences and binary outcomes with odds ratios. Heterogeneity was evaluated via Cochrane Q and I². Subgroup analysis focused on first-trimester exposure.
Results: No statistically significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between GLP-1 RA and control group, including fetal growth restriction or small for gestational age (p = 0.12), live births (p = 0.10), major birth defects (p = 0.79), miscarriages (p = 0.41), preterm delivery (p = 0.62); and stillbirths (p = 0.09). GLP-1 RAs were linked to a lower risk of congenital heart defects (p = 0.03), even in the subgroup analysis (p = 0.03), and showed no significant protective effect against gestational diabetes (p = 0.49). In subgroup analysis, there were no notable differences in miscarriage (p = 0.32), major birth defects (p = 0.83) and preterm delivery (p = 0.88); there were fewer live births that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).
Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was observed between the control and intervention groups. GLP-1 RAs were connected to a lower risk of congenital heart defects.
期刊介绍:
Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF).
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines.
Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.