Long-Term Outcomes and Patient Experiences With the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jonathan D Shirian, Alex Yuan, Aleksandra Rachitskaya
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes and Patient Experiences With the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System.","authors":"Jonathan D Shirian, Alex Yuan, Aleksandra Rachitskaya","doi":"10.1177/24741264251376042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the long-term outcomes and experiences of patients with the Argus II retinal prosthesis in individuals with advanced-stage retinitis pigmentosa. <b>Methods:</b> Chart review was conducted on 13 patients with the Argus II implant between June 2015 and February 2018 at the Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute. Data collected included examination findings, adverse events, device usage, impact on quality of life, and patient satisfaction. <b>Results:</b> The average age of patients at implantation was 71 years, with 84.6% being male. All patients had severe visual impairment prior to surgery. Four patients experienced serious adverse events, including conjunctival erosion, vitreous hemorrhage, persistent corneal abrasion, and vertigo. None of the 10 patients who had recent follow-up appointments were currently using the device, with an average ± SD usage duration of 3.34 ± 2.65 years. Discontinuation reasons included performance issues, cognitive load, and physical discomfort, among others. Five patients reported that with the knowledge they currently have, they would choose to receive the implant again. <b>Conclusions:</b> Argus II provided potential benefits but also presented significant challenges related to device performance, cognitive demands, and long-term support. The cessation of commercial operations by the manufacturer and the resulting lack of support further complicated the experiences of patients. Despite this, the device remains a pioneering step in retinitis pigmentosa treatment, underscoring the need for ongoing innovation in visual prosthesis technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251376042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251376042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term outcomes and experiences of patients with the Argus II retinal prosthesis in individuals with advanced-stage retinitis pigmentosa. Methods: Chart review was conducted on 13 patients with the Argus II implant between June 2015 and February 2018 at the Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute. Data collected included examination findings, adverse events, device usage, impact on quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Results: The average age of patients at implantation was 71 years, with 84.6% being male. All patients had severe visual impairment prior to surgery. Four patients experienced serious adverse events, including conjunctival erosion, vitreous hemorrhage, persistent corneal abrasion, and vertigo. None of the 10 patients who had recent follow-up appointments were currently using the device, with an average ± SD usage duration of 3.34 ± 2.65 years. Discontinuation reasons included performance issues, cognitive load, and physical discomfort, among others. Five patients reported that with the knowledge they currently have, they would choose to receive the implant again. Conclusions: Argus II provided potential benefits but also presented significant challenges related to device performance, cognitive demands, and long-term support. The cessation of commercial operations by the manufacturer and the resulting lack of support further complicated the experiences of patients. Despite this, the device remains a pioneering step in retinitis pigmentosa treatment, underscoring the need for ongoing innovation in visual prosthesis technology.

Argus II型视网膜假体系统的长期疗效和患者经验。
目的:评价晚期色素性视网膜炎患者使用Argus II型视网膜假体的长期疗效和经验。方法:对2015年6月至2018年2月在克利夫兰诊所科尔眼科研究所使用Argus II种植体的13例患者进行图表回顾。收集的数据包括检查结果、不良事件、器械使用、对生活质量的影响和患者满意度。结果:植入患者平均年龄71岁,男性占84.6%。所有患者术前均有严重的视力障碍。4例患者出现严重不良事件,包括结膜糜烂、玻璃体出血、持续性角膜磨损和眩晕。最近随访的10例患者目前均未使用该设备,平均±SD使用时间为3.34±2.65年。停药的原因包括性能问题、认知负荷和身体不适等。五名患者报告说,根据他们目前掌握的知识,他们会选择再次接受植入。结论:Argus II提供了潜在的益处,但也提出了与设备性能、认知需求和长期支持相关的重大挑战。制造商停止商业运作以及由此导致的缺乏支持使患者的经历进一步复杂化。尽管如此,该设备仍然是视网膜色素变性治疗的开创性步骤,强调了视觉假体技术不断创新的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信