Validation of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) in a Japanese population: experience from seven clinics.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Takeshi Iwasa, Yuri Yamamoto, Hiroki Noguchi, Yuka Miyazaki, Akari Obashi, Tatsuya Nakano, Noritaka Fukunaga, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Sho Takeda, Hirofumi Morita, Ryoma Tsuchiya, Shigetoshi Mizumoto, Yozo Nagao, Takeshi Sugimoto, Shiori Ishida, Kohyu Furuhashi, Daniela N Bakalova, Ianae Ichikawa Ceschin, Aisaku Fukuda, Yoshiharu Nakaoka, Yoshimasa Asada, Keiich Kato, Takeshi Kuramoto, Satoshi Kawachiya, Masahide Shiotani
{"title":"Validation of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) in a Japanese population: experience from seven clinics.","authors":"Takeshi Iwasa, Yuri Yamamoto, Hiroki Noguchi, Yuka Miyazaki, Akari Obashi, Tatsuya Nakano, Noritaka Fukunaga, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Sho Takeda, Hirofumi Morita, Ryoma Tsuchiya, Shigetoshi Mizumoto, Yozo Nagao, Takeshi Sugimoto, Shiori Ishida, Kohyu Furuhashi, Daniela N Bakalova, Ianae Ichikawa Ceschin, Aisaku Fukuda, Yoshiharu Nakaoka, Yoshimasa Asada, Keiich Kato, Takeshi Kuramoto, Satoshi Kawachiya, Masahide Shiotani","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03670-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of implementing non-invasive PGT-A (niPGT-A) in clinical practice. Informativity and concordance rates between three sample types (embryonic cell-free DNA [cfDNA] present in spent blastocyst medium [SBM], trophectoderm [TE] biopsy, and whole blastocyst [WB]) from the same embryo were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter study conducted between February 2022 and November 2022 at seven Japanese IVF centres. 212 blastocysts were donated for research. The cfDNA released into the SBM was analysed, and the results were compared against the corresponding TE biopsy and WB sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall informativity rates for SBM, TE, and WB were 81.6% (173/212), 98.6% (209/212), and 98.6% (209/212), respectively. There was no difference between TE and WB; however, SBM was significantly different to both (p < 0.001). The informativity rate in SBM samples significantly varied among the seven centres, ranging between 72.7 and 97.1% (p = 0.041). Ploidy concordance (SBM-TE) also varied across the centres, ranging between 68.2 and 90.9%; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.63). Ploidy concordance rates in SBM-TE, SBM-WB, and TE-WB were 77.4% (130/168), 77.4% (130/168), and 90.5% (152/168), respectively. There was no statistical difference for SBM-TE and SBM-WB, but both were statistically different to TE-WB (p = 0.0054).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have shown results that are consistent with the existing literature, indicating the feasibility of applying the niPGT-A protocol described here, and thus using the SBM result to establish a priority for embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>The study was approved by Tokushima University Hospital Life Science and Medical Research Ethics Review Committee (Permission number: 4057).</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03670-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of implementing non-invasive PGT-A (niPGT-A) in clinical practice. Informativity and concordance rates between three sample types (embryonic cell-free DNA [cfDNA] present in spent blastocyst medium [SBM], trophectoderm [TE] biopsy, and whole blastocyst [WB]) from the same embryo were evaluated.

Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter study conducted between February 2022 and November 2022 at seven Japanese IVF centres. 212 blastocysts were donated for research. The cfDNA released into the SBM was analysed, and the results were compared against the corresponding TE biopsy and WB sample.

Results: Overall informativity rates for SBM, TE, and WB were 81.6% (173/212), 98.6% (209/212), and 98.6% (209/212), respectively. There was no difference between TE and WB; however, SBM was significantly different to both (p < 0.001). The informativity rate in SBM samples significantly varied among the seven centres, ranging between 72.7 and 97.1% (p = 0.041). Ploidy concordance (SBM-TE) also varied across the centres, ranging between 68.2 and 90.9%; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.63). Ploidy concordance rates in SBM-TE, SBM-WB, and TE-WB were 77.4% (130/168), 77.4% (130/168), and 90.5% (152/168), respectively. There was no statistical difference for SBM-TE and SBM-WB, but both were statistically different to TE-WB (p = 0.0054).

Conclusion: We have shown results that are consistent with the existing literature, indicating the feasibility of applying the niPGT-A protocol described here, and thus using the SBM result to establish a priority for embryo transfer.

Trial registration information: The study was approved by Tokushima University Hospital Life Science and Medical Research Ethics Review Committee (Permission number: 4057).

验证非整倍体(niPGT-A)在日本人群中的非侵入性植入前基因检测:来自七个诊所的经验。
目的:本研究的目的是确定在临床实践中实施无创PGT-A (niPGT-A)的可行性。评估了来自同一胚胎的三种样品类型(胚泡废培养基[SBM]、滋养外胚层活检[TE]和全胚泡[WB]中存在的无胚胎细胞DNA [cfDNA])的信息性和一致性。方法:这是一项前瞻性多中心研究,于2022年2月至2022年11月在7个日本试管婴儿中心进行。212个囊胚被捐赠用于研究。分析释放到SBM中的cfDNA,并将结果与相应的TE活检和WB样本进行比较。结果:SBM、TE和WB的总体信息率分别为81.6%(173/212)、98.6%(209/212)和98.6%(209/212)。TE与WB无差异;结论:我们的结果与现有文献一致,表明应用本文描述的niPGT-A方案的可行性,从而利用SBM结果确定胚胎移植的优先顺序。试验注册信息:本研究经德岛大学医院生命科学与医学研究伦理审查委员会批准(许可号:4057)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信