Spaghettification and the Conceptual Black Hole of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Qualitative Discussion Around Competing Meanings Given to the Diagnosis and Their Potential Consequences.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Dan Warrender
{"title":"Spaghettification and the Conceptual Black Hole of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Qualitative Discussion Around Competing Meanings Given to the Diagnosis and Their Potential Consequences.","authors":"Dan Warrender","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2025.2558056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper explores competing meanings which may arise through receiving a diagnosis of \"borderline personality disorder,\" discussing how this may impact a person's treatment and their sense of self. This paper is informed by qualitative case study research, which utilized interviews to explore experiences of crisis and crisis intervention for people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, their family and friends, and professionals who work with them. Utilizing this qualitative research data, alongside wider literature, the conceptualization of \"borderline personality disorder\" and the actual and potential real-world consequences of receiving this label are explored. Potential meanings are mapped onto a \"black hole\" model where potential competing meanings exist in the same place at the same time, and harm a persons sense of self. \"Borderline personality disorder\" is the most controversial personality disorder diagnosis. People may conceptualize their distress through four different labels for borderline personality disorder, be seen as \"not real mental illness,\" \"borderline of what?\", not personality disorder, only personality disorder, and too unstable for therapy. Spaghettification, a term from astrophysics, is used as a metaphor to explain how a persons sense of self can fragment as they are pulled into the confusion of this black hole.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2025.2558056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores competing meanings which may arise through receiving a diagnosis of "borderline personality disorder," discussing how this may impact a person's treatment and their sense of self. This paper is informed by qualitative case study research, which utilized interviews to explore experiences of crisis and crisis intervention for people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, their family and friends, and professionals who work with them. Utilizing this qualitative research data, alongside wider literature, the conceptualization of "borderline personality disorder" and the actual and potential real-world consequences of receiving this label are explored. Potential meanings are mapped onto a "black hole" model where potential competing meanings exist in the same place at the same time, and harm a persons sense of self. "Borderline personality disorder" is the most controversial personality disorder diagnosis. People may conceptualize their distress through four different labels for borderline personality disorder, be seen as "not real mental illness," "borderline of what?", not personality disorder, only personality disorder, and too unstable for therapy. Spaghettification, a term from astrophysics, is used as a metaphor to explain how a persons sense of self can fragment as they are pulled into the confusion of this black hole.

意面化与边缘型人格障碍的概念黑洞:围绕对诊断的竞争性意义及其潜在后果的定性讨论。
本文探讨了接受“边缘型人格障碍”诊断可能产生的相互矛盾的含义,讨论了这可能如何影响一个人的治疗和他们的自我意识。本文采用定性案例研究的方法,通过访谈的方式来探讨边缘型人格障碍患者、他们的家人和朋友以及与他们一起工作的专业人员的危机经历和危机干预。利用这些定性研究数据,以及更广泛的文献,探索了“边缘型人格障碍”的概念化以及接受这一标签的实际和潜在的现实世界后果。潜在的意义被映射到一个“黑洞”模型中,在这个模型中,潜在的竞争意义同时存在于同一个地方,并且损害了一个人的自我意识。“边缘型人格障碍”是最具争议的人格障碍诊断。人们可能会通过四种不同的边缘性人格障碍标签来概念化他们的痛苦,被视为“不是真正的精神疾病”,“边缘性什么?”,不是人格障碍,只是人格障碍,太不稳定而无法治疗。意大利面化,一个来自天体物理学的术语,被用作一个比喻,用来解释当一个人被拉进这个黑洞的混乱中时,他们的自我意识是如何分裂的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing NURSINGPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信