Does preoperative waiting time influence anxiety and analgesic demand? A prospective observational study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Erkan Bayram, İlke Dolğun
{"title":"Does preoperative waiting time influence anxiety and analgesic demand? A prospective observational study.","authors":"Erkan Bayram, İlke Dolğun","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04102-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative anxiety adversely affects anesthetic management, hemodynamic stability, and recovery. Among modifiable perioperative variables, the impact of preoperative waiting time on anxiety and postoperative outcomes has been insufficiently explored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the relationship between waiting time and perioperative anxiety, hemodynamic responses, intraoperative opioid use, and postoperative analgesic requirements in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, 130 ASA I-II adults were evaluated in the preoperative waiting area. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), systolic blood pressure, and heart rate were measured on arrival and immediately pre-induction. Waiting time was the interval between these assessments. Intraoperative fentanyl/remifentanil doses and postoperative tramadol consumption were recorded. Pearson correlation and linear regression were used (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Longer waiting times were associated with higher pre-induction APAIS scores (r = 0.339, p < 0.001) and greater postoperative tramadol use (r = 0.333, p < 0.001). Waiting time inversely correlated with preoperative systolic blood pressure (r =  - 0.253, p = 0.004). Associations with intraoperative opioid doses were not significant. Female sex, lower education, prior surgery, and negative surgical experiences were associated with higher anxiety. Midazolam premedication did not prevent anxiety escalation in patients with extended waiting times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative waiting time is a modifiable, hospital-based factor that meaningfully influences perioperative anxiety and postoperative analgesic demand. Reducing unnecessary delays through individualized perioperative planning may enhance patient comfort, support hemodynamic stability, and reduce postoperative analgesic requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04102-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative anxiety adversely affects anesthetic management, hemodynamic stability, and recovery. Among modifiable perioperative variables, the impact of preoperative waiting time on anxiety and postoperative outcomes has been insufficiently explored.

Aim: To assess the relationship between waiting time and perioperative anxiety, hemodynamic responses, intraoperative opioid use, and postoperative analgesic requirements in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 130 ASA I-II adults were evaluated in the preoperative waiting area. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), systolic blood pressure, and heart rate were measured on arrival and immediately pre-induction. Waiting time was the interval between these assessments. Intraoperative fentanyl/remifentanil doses and postoperative tramadol consumption were recorded. Pearson correlation and linear regression were used (p < 0.05).

Results: Longer waiting times were associated with higher pre-induction APAIS scores (r = 0.339, p < 0.001) and greater postoperative tramadol use (r = 0.333, p < 0.001). Waiting time inversely correlated with preoperative systolic blood pressure (r =  - 0.253, p = 0.004). Associations with intraoperative opioid doses were not significant. Female sex, lower education, prior surgery, and negative surgical experiences were associated with higher anxiety. Midazolam premedication did not prevent anxiety escalation in patients with extended waiting times.

Conclusion: Preoperative waiting time is a modifiable, hospital-based factor that meaningfully influences perioperative anxiety and postoperative analgesic demand. Reducing unnecessary delays through individualized perioperative planning may enhance patient comfort, support hemodynamic stability, and reduce postoperative analgesic requirements.

术前等待时间是否影响焦虑和镇痛需求?一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:术前焦虑对麻醉管理、血流动力学稳定性和恢复有不利影响。在可修改的围手术期变量中,术前等待时间对焦虑和术后结局的影响尚未得到充分探讨。目的:评估全麻下成人择期手术的等待时间与围手术期焦虑、血流动力学反应、术中阿片类药物使用和术后镇痛需求之间的关系。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,在术前等待区对130名ASA I-II成人进行了评估。阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑和信息量表(APAIS),收缩压,心率测量到达和立即诱导前。等待时间是这些评估之间的间隔时间。记录术中芬太尼/瑞芬太尼剂量和术后曲马多用量。结果:等待时间越长,诱导前APAIS评分越高(r = 0.339, p)。结论:术前等待时间是一个可改变的、基于医院的因素,对围手术期焦虑和术后镇痛需求有显著影响。通过个体化围手术期计划减少不必要的延迟可以提高患者舒适度,支持血流动力学稳定性,减少术后镇痛需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信