Models of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

IF 10.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Oscar J Pundel, Benjamin G Neel
{"title":"Models of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.","authors":"Oscar J Pundel, Benjamin G Neel","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) remains an incompletely understood, highly lethal disease. Historically, a lack of fidelitous in vitro and in vivo models representing HGSC biology and therapy response has been a major barrier to progress. As we discuss below, multiple (if not most) early studies used-and some investigators continue to use-human \"ovarian cancer cell lines\" that lack key genomic/genetic features of HGSC, rendering their conclusions questionable. The frequently deployed ID8 syngeneic mouse model is similarly suspect, as it derives from ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) and is <i>Trp53</i> wild-type. In contrast, most, if not all, HGSC arises in fallopian tube epithelium (FTE), and bona fide HGSC is universally <i>TP53</i> mutant or silenced. Over the past 10 years, attempts have been made to rectify these historical deficiencies, including careful assessment of the genetic composition of standard ovarian cancer cell lines and the development of mouse and human organoids, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). In this review, we discuss these advances, exploring their differences, strengths, and weaknesses. We also describe \"next-generation\" approaches to more faithfully model HGSC cells in the context of a more realistic tumor microenvironment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041949","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) remains an incompletely understood, highly lethal disease. Historically, a lack of fidelitous in vitro and in vivo models representing HGSC biology and therapy response has been a major barrier to progress. As we discuss below, multiple (if not most) early studies used-and some investigators continue to use-human "ovarian cancer cell lines" that lack key genomic/genetic features of HGSC, rendering their conclusions questionable. The frequently deployed ID8 syngeneic mouse model is similarly suspect, as it derives from ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) and is Trp53 wild-type. In contrast, most, if not all, HGSC arises in fallopian tube epithelium (FTE), and bona fide HGSC is universally TP53 mutant or silenced. Over the past 10 years, attempts have been made to rectify these historical deficiencies, including careful assessment of the genetic composition of standard ovarian cancer cell lines and the development of mouse and human organoids, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). In this review, we discuss these advances, exploring their differences, strengths, and weaknesses. We also describe "next-generation" approaches to more faithfully model HGSC cells in the context of a more realistic tumor microenvironment.

高级别浆液性卵巢癌的模型。
高级别浆液性卵巢癌(HGSC)仍然是一种不完全了解的高致死率疾病。从历史上看,缺乏忠实的体外和体内模型代表造血干细胞生物学和治疗反应一直是进展的主要障碍。正如我们在下面讨论的那样,许多(如果不是大多数的话)早期研究使用了——一些研究者继续使用——缺乏HGSC关键基因组/遗传特征的人类“卵巢癌细胞系”,这使得他们的结论值得怀疑。经常使用的ID8同基因小鼠模型同样值得怀疑,因为它来源于卵巢表面上皮(OSE),并且是Trp53野生型。相反,大多数(如果不是全部)HGSC发生在输卵管上皮(FTE),真正的HGSC普遍是TP53突变或沉默。在过去的10年里,人们试图纠正这些历史上的缺陷,包括仔细评估标准卵巢癌细胞系的遗传组成,以及小鼠和人类类器官、基因工程小鼠模型(GEMMs)和患者来源的异种移植物(PDXs)的发展。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了这些进展,探讨了它们的差异、优势和劣势。我们还描述了在更真实的肿瘤微环境中更忠实地模拟HGSC细胞的“下一代”方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine
Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
1.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine is a monthly online publication comprising reviews on different aspects of a variety of diseases, covering everything from the molecular and cellular bases of disease to translational medicine and new therapeutic strategies. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine is thus unmatched in its depth of coverage and represents an essential source where readers can find informed surveys and critical discussion of advances in molecular medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信