Quality of life after treatment of vestibular schwannomas.

Q2 Medicine
Morten Lund-Johansen
{"title":"Quality of life after treatment of vestibular schwannomas.","authors":"Morten Lund-Johansen","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-12-824534-7.00022-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last two decades, health-related quality of life (QOL) in vestibular schwannoma patients has gained increasing attention among caretakers, and patient-reported outcomes are frequently included in clinical studies, as a secondary or even primary outcome. Numerous general and disease-specific questionnaires exist, as well as questionnaires directed toward specific symptoms, such as hearing loss or vestibular complaints. When evaluating score outcomes, a small, statistically significant difference may not be clinically relevant. For several scoring systems such as the PANQOL questionnaire, the minimal clinically identifiable difference (MCID) has been identified and should be used when analyzing data. The main generator of generally reduced QOL in VS patients is vestibular complaints, in particular dizziness. When comparing groups receiving observation, or radiosurgery or surgery, differences in response tend to be minor, both between groups as well as before and after treatment. In most studies, patients operated tend to report somewhat lower than others, but the differences are quite small. In one study including non-VS responders, there were, however, highly significant differences in score outcomes between patients and controls; thus, it seems that being a VS patient is the main driver of outcome and that treatment modality has a lower impact. Future research on QOL in VS patients should direct toward a refinement of instruments, and toward prospectively designed studies with baseline and follow-up recordings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":"212 ","pages":"341-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of clinical neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824534-7.00022-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last two decades, health-related quality of life (QOL) in vestibular schwannoma patients has gained increasing attention among caretakers, and patient-reported outcomes are frequently included in clinical studies, as a secondary or even primary outcome. Numerous general and disease-specific questionnaires exist, as well as questionnaires directed toward specific symptoms, such as hearing loss or vestibular complaints. When evaluating score outcomes, a small, statistically significant difference may not be clinically relevant. For several scoring systems such as the PANQOL questionnaire, the minimal clinically identifiable difference (MCID) has been identified and should be used when analyzing data. The main generator of generally reduced QOL in VS patients is vestibular complaints, in particular dizziness. When comparing groups receiving observation, or radiosurgery or surgery, differences in response tend to be minor, both between groups as well as before and after treatment. In most studies, patients operated tend to report somewhat lower than others, but the differences are quite small. In one study including non-VS responders, there were, however, highly significant differences in score outcomes between patients and controls; thus, it seems that being a VS patient is the main driver of outcome and that treatment modality has a lower impact. Future research on QOL in VS patients should direct toward a refinement of instruments, and toward prospectively designed studies with baseline and follow-up recordings.

前庭神经鞘瘤治疗后的生活质量。
在过去的二十年中,前庭神经鞘瘤患者的健康相关生活质量(QOL)越来越受到护理人员的关注,患者报告的结果经常被纳入临床研究,作为次要甚至主要结果。存在大量的一般和特定疾病问卷,以及针对特定症状的问卷,如听力损失或前庭不适。在评估评分结果时,一个小的、统计学上显著的差异可能与临床无关。对于一些评分系统,如PANQOL问卷,已经确定了最小临床可识别差异(MCID),并应在分析数据时使用。VS患者普遍生活质量降低的主要原因是前庭不适,尤其是头晕。在观察组、放疗组和手术组的比较中,无论是组间还是治疗前后,疗效的差异往往较小。在大多数研究中,接受手术的患者往往比其他人报告的要低一些,但差异很小。然而,在一项包括非vs应答者的研究中,患者和对照组之间的评分结果存在高度显著差异;因此,作为VS患者似乎是结果的主要驱动因素,而治疗方式的影响较小。未来对VS患者生活质量的研究应着眼于改进仪器,以及前瞻性设计的研究,包括基线和随访记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Handbook of clinical neurology
Handbook of clinical neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: The Handbook of Clinical Neurology (HCN) was originally conceived and edited by Pierre Vinken and George Bruyn as a prestigious, multivolume reference work that would cover all the disorders encountered by clinicians and researchers engaged in neurology and allied fields. The first series of the Handbook (Volumes 1-44) was published between 1968 and 1982 and was followed by a second series (Volumes 45-78), guided by the same editors, which concluded in 2002. By that time, the Handbook had come to represent one of the largest scientific works ever published. In 2002, Professors Michael J. Aminoff, François Boller, and Dick F. Swaab took on the responsibility of supervising the third (current) series, the first volumes of which published in 2003. They have designed this series to encompass both clinical neurology and also the basic and clinical neurosciences that are its underpinning. Given the enormity and complexity of the accumulating literature, it is almost impossible to keep abreast of developments in the field, thus providing the raison d''être for the series. The series will thus appeal to clinicians and investigators alike, providing to each an added dimension. Now, more than 140 volumes after it began, the Handbook of Clinical Neurology series has an unparalleled reputation for providing the latest information on fundamental research on the operation of the nervous system in health and disease, comprehensive clinical information on neurological and related disorders, and up-to-date treatment protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信