Is 'better' enough? Prevalence and multidimensional portrait of persistent dyspnea upon discharge from a respiratory medicine ward: a prospective, single-center observational study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Capucine Morélot-Panzini, Safaa Nemlaghi, Morgane Faure, Laure Serresse, Thomas Similowski
{"title":"Is 'better' enough? Prevalence and multidimensional portrait of persistent dyspnea upon discharge from a respiratory medicine ward: a prospective, single-center observational study.","authors":"Capucine Morélot-Panzini, Safaa Nemlaghi, Morgane Faure, Laure Serresse, Thomas Similowski","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03923-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During unplanned respiratory-related hospitalizations, gradual improvement in physiological variables and reduced dependence on treatment are crucial for discharge decisions, possibly supported by discharge care bundles designed to reduce post-hospitalization readmission and mortality. However, patients prioritize symptom relief. This study tested the hypothesis that a significant proportion of patients admitted to a pulmonology ward for an acute respiratory episode experience dyspnea on the day of discharge. It further aimed to describe this dyspnea in a multidimensional manner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 10-week prospective study was conducted at a single center and included patients admitted for acute respiratory conditions such as COPD or asthma exacerbation, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, or pleural disease, who, on admission, reported a rating of 3 or higher on the \"immediate breathing discomfort\" item of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP-A1). Dyspnea was assessed both at admission and at discharge using a multidimensional recall-based tool (MDP) and an instant unidimensional tool, the 10-cm visual analog scale (D-VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy consecutive patients were included in the study. Although dyspnea ratings showed a statistically significant decrease during the hospital stay, dyspnea remained both frequent and intense at discharge. At discharge, 84% of patients provided MDP-A1 recall ratings above 0, with 70% rating their MDP-A1 at 3 or more. In contrast, only 22% provided D-VAS instant ratings of 3 or higher. The median MDP-A1 score was 4.0 [2.0-6.0]. \"Air hunger\" was the most frequently selected sensory descriptor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent dyspnea remains frequent and intense among patients being discharged after an acute respiratory episode.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03923-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During unplanned respiratory-related hospitalizations, gradual improvement in physiological variables and reduced dependence on treatment are crucial for discharge decisions, possibly supported by discharge care bundles designed to reduce post-hospitalization readmission and mortality. However, patients prioritize symptom relief. This study tested the hypothesis that a significant proportion of patients admitted to a pulmonology ward for an acute respiratory episode experience dyspnea on the day of discharge. It further aimed to describe this dyspnea in a multidimensional manner.

Methods: This 10-week prospective study was conducted at a single center and included patients admitted for acute respiratory conditions such as COPD or asthma exacerbation, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, or pleural disease, who, on admission, reported a rating of 3 or higher on the "immediate breathing discomfort" item of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP-A1). Dyspnea was assessed both at admission and at discharge using a multidimensional recall-based tool (MDP) and an instant unidimensional tool, the 10-cm visual analog scale (D-VAS).

Results: Seventy consecutive patients were included in the study. Although dyspnea ratings showed a statistically significant decrease during the hospital stay, dyspnea remained both frequent and intense at discharge. At discharge, 84% of patients provided MDP-A1 recall ratings above 0, with 70% rating their MDP-A1 at 3 or more. In contrast, only 22% provided D-VAS instant ratings of 3 or higher. The median MDP-A1 score was 4.0 [2.0-6.0]. "Air hunger" was the most frequently selected sensory descriptor.

Conclusions: Persistent dyspnea remains frequent and intense among patients being discharged after an acute respiratory episode.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“更好”就够了吗?从呼吸内科病房出院后持续性呼吸困难的患病率和多维画像:一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究。
背景:在计划外的呼吸相关住院期间,生理变量的逐渐改善和对治疗依赖性的降低对出院决策至关重要,可能得到旨在减少住院后再入院和死亡率的出院护理包的支持。然而,患者优先考虑症状缓解。本研究检验了一项假设,即在肺科病房因急性呼吸发作而入院的患者中,有相当大比例的患者在出院当天出现呼吸困难。它进一步旨在以多维方式描述这种呼吸困难。方法:这项为期10周的前瞻性研究在单中心进行,纳入了因急性呼吸系统疾病(如COPD或哮喘加重、肺炎、肺栓塞或胸膜疾病)入院的患者,这些患者在入院时报告多维呼吸困难谱(MDP-A1)的“立即呼吸不适”项目评分为3或更高。在入院和出院时使用基于多维回忆的工具(MDP)和即时一维工具,即10厘米视觉模拟量表(D-VAS)评估呼吸困难。结果:70例患者连续纳入研究。虽然在住院期间呼吸困难评分有统计学意义的下降,但出院时呼吸困难仍然频繁和严重。出院时,84%的患者提供的MDP-A1回忆评分高于0,70%的患者将他们的MDP-A1评分为3或更高。相比之下,只有22%的患者提供D-VAS即时评分为3分或更高。中位MDP-A1评分为4.0[2.0-6.0]。“空气饥饿”是最常被选择的感官描述。结论:在急性呼吸发作后出院的患者中,持续性呼吸困难仍然是频繁和强烈的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信