Progression of diabetic retinopathy in a longitudinal real-world study of patients in primary care.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Geeta Lalwani, Charles C Wykoff, Jayla Briggs, Chin-Yu Lin, Verena Steffen, Zdenka Haskova
{"title":"Progression of diabetic retinopathy in a longitudinal real-world study of patients in primary care.","authors":"Geeta Lalwani, Charles C Wykoff, Jayla Briggs, Chin-Yu Lin, Verena Steffen, Zdenka Haskova","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04307-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the impact of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity on the risk of DR progression to proliferative DR (PDR) or clinically significant macular edema (CSME) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional, and observational cohort study of patients with DM in the United States based on a database of 7-field color fundus photograph images from primary care visits. Study participants were adults aged ≥ 18 years who underwent DR screening in either eye between January 1999 and December 2016. DR severity was graded according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) on 7-field color fundus photographs. The main outcomes were ≥ 2-step DR worsening and development of CSME, PDR, or CSME and PDR together.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all 41,977 eyes evaluated, the proportion of eyes with ≥ 2-step DR worsening was 2.7% at year 2 and 9.6% at year 5. Rate of ≥ 2-step DR worsening was greatest among eyes with moderate-to-severe NPDR with baseline DRSS 43-53 (36.5% at year 5). Analysis of PDR and CSME outcomes showed the presence of 3 distinct clinical phenotypes: 1 subset progressed to CSME (1.24% at year 5), another to PDR (0.49% at year 5), and only a small subset progressed to both vision-threatening forms of DR (0.10% at year 5). The clinical phenotype did not appear to be dependent on baseline DRSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the risk of progression to vision-threatening forms of DR was more pronounced in eyes with moderate-to-severe non-proliferative DR at baseline. In addition, we found that distinct DR clinical subtypes progressing to either PDR and/or CSME over a 5-year period are not driven by baseline DR severity, suggesting other factors may contribute.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04307-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity on the risk of DR progression to proliferative DR (PDR) or clinically significant macular edema (CSME) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods: This is a prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional, and observational cohort study of patients with DM in the United States based on a database of 7-field color fundus photograph images from primary care visits. Study participants were adults aged ≥ 18 years who underwent DR screening in either eye between January 1999 and December 2016. DR severity was graded according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) on 7-field color fundus photographs. The main outcomes were ≥ 2-step DR worsening and development of CSME, PDR, or CSME and PDR together.

Results: For all 41,977 eyes evaluated, the proportion of eyes with ≥ 2-step DR worsening was 2.7% at year 2 and 9.6% at year 5. Rate of ≥ 2-step DR worsening was greatest among eyes with moderate-to-severe NPDR with baseline DRSS 43-53 (36.5% at year 5). Analysis of PDR and CSME outcomes showed the presence of 3 distinct clinical phenotypes: 1 subset progressed to CSME (1.24% at year 5), another to PDR (0.49% at year 5), and only a small subset progressed to both vision-threatening forms of DR (0.10% at year 5). The clinical phenotype did not appear to be dependent on baseline DRSS.

Conclusions: Overall, the risk of progression to vision-threatening forms of DR was more pronounced in eyes with moderate-to-severe non-proliferative DR at baseline. In addition, we found that distinct DR clinical subtypes progressing to either PDR and/or CSME over a 5-year period are not driven by baseline DR severity, suggesting other factors may contribute.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

糖尿病视网膜病变在初级保健患者的纵向现实世界研究中的进展。
背景:本研究的目的是评估糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)严重程度对糖尿病(DM)患者发展为增殖性DR (PDR)或临床显著黄斑水肿(CSME)风险的影响。方法:这是一项前瞻性、纵向、非介入性和观察性队列研究,研究对象是美国的糖尿病患者,该研究基于来自初级保健就诊的7场彩色眼底照片图像数据库。研究参与者为年龄≥18岁的成年人,在1999年1月至2016年12月期间接受了双眼DR筛查。根据早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究-糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度量表(ETDRS-DRSS)对7场彩色眼底照片进行DR严重程度分级。主要结局为≥2步DR恶化、CSME、PDR或CSME和PDR合并发展。结果:在所有41977只被评估的眼睛中,2级以上DR恶化的眼睛比例在第2年为2.7%,在第5年为9.6%。在基线DRSS为43-53的中重度NPDR患者中,≥2步DR恶化率最高(第5年为36.5%)。PDR和CSME结果分析显示存在3种不同的临床表型:1个亚群进展为CSME(第5年为1.24%),另一个亚群进展为PDR(第5年为0.49%),只有一小部分亚群进展为两种视力威胁型DR(第5年为0.10%)。临床表型似乎不依赖于基线DRSS。结论:总体而言,在基线时,中度至重度非增殖性DR进展为视力威胁型DR的风险更为明显。此外,我们发现不同的DR临床亚型在5年期间进展为PDR和/或CSME并不是由基线DR严重程度驱动的,这表明其他因素可能起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信