Ke Ma, Andrey Vlasov, Zeynep B Simsek, Jinshui Zhang, Yiru Li, Boshuo Wang, David L K Murphy, Jessica Y Choi, Maya E Clinton, Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk, Angel V Peterchev, Stephan M Goetz
{"title":"Optimal asymmetric electric field pulses for selective transcranial magnetic stimulation with minimised power and coil heating.","authors":"Ke Ma, Andrey Vlasov, Zeynep B Simsek, Jinshui Zhang, Yiru Li, Boshuo Wang, David L K Murphy, Jessica Y Choi, Maya E Clinton, Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk, Angel V Peterchev, Stephan M Goetz","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with asymmetric electric field pulses, such as monophasic, offers directional selectivity for neural activation but requires excessive energy. Previous pulse shape optimisation has been limited to symmetric pulses or heavily constrained variations of conventional waveforms without achieving general optimality in energy efficiency or neural selectivity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to develop a minimally constrained optimisation framework for identifying energy-efficient asymmetric TMS pulses with directional selectivity of neural stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a novel optimisation framework that incorporates neuron model activation constraints and flexible control of pulse asymmetry. The optimised waveforms were experimentally validated against conventional and previously optimised pulses. We measured motor thresholds for conventional pulses as well as one of the optimised unidirectional rectangular (OUR) pulses and compared its MEP latency for anterior-posterior (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) electric field directions in six healthy human subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimised electric field waveforms had leading phases with a time constant of 280±15μs (mean±SD) and near-rectangular main stimulation phases. They achieved up to 92% and 88% reduction in energy loss and thus heating compared to conventional monophasic pulses and previously improved monophasic-equivalent pulses, respectively. In the human experiments, OUR pulses showed similar motor thresholds to monophasic pulses in both AP and PA directions whilst achieving significantly lower energy loss, particularly in the AP direction. Moreover, there was a significant MEP latency difference of 1.79±0.41ms (mean±SE) between AP and PA direction with OUR pulses, suggesting directional selectivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our framework successfully identified highly energy-efficient asymmetric pulses for directionally-selective neural engagement. These pulses can enable selective rapid-rate repetitive TMS protocols with reduced power consumption and coil heating, with potential benefits for precision and potency of neuromodulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with asymmetric electric field pulses, such as monophasic, offers directional selectivity for neural activation but requires excessive energy. Previous pulse shape optimisation has been limited to symmetric pulses or heavily constrained variations of conventional waveforms without achieving general optimality in energy efficiency or neural selectivity.
Objective: We sought to develop a minimally constrained optimisation framework for identifying energy-efficient asymmetric TMS pulses with directional selectivity of neural stimulation.
Methods: We implemented a novel optimisation framework that incorporates neuron model activation constraints and flexible control of pulse asymmetry. The optimised waveforms were experimentally validated against conventional and previously optimised pulses. We measured motor thresholds for conventional pulses as well as one of the optimised unidirectional rectangular (OUR) pulses and compared its MEP latency for anterior-posterior (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) electric field directions in six healthy human subjects.
Results: The optimised electric field waveforms had leading phases with a time constant of 280±15μs (mean±SD) and near-rectangular main stimulation phases. They achieved up to 92% and 88% reduction in energy loss and thus heating compared to conventional monophasic pulses and previously improved monophasic-equivalent pulses, respectively. In the human experiments, OUR pulses showed similar motor thresholds to monophasic pulses in both AP and PA directions whilst achieving significantly lower energy loss, particularly in the AP direction. Moreover, there was a significant MEP latency difference of 1.79±0.41ms (mean±SE) between AP and PA direction with OUR pulses, suggesting directional selectivity.
Conclusion: Our framework successfully identified highly energy-efficient asymmetric pulses for directionally-selective neural engagement. These pulses can enable selective rapid-rate repetitive TMS protocols with reduced power consumption and coil heating, with potential benefits for precision and potency of neuromodulation.
期刊介绍:
Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation.
Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.