Optimal asymmetric electric field pulses for selective transcranial magnetic stimulation with minimised power and coil heating.

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ke Ma, Andrey Vlasov, Zeynep B Simsek, Jinshui Zhang, Yiru Li, Boshuo Wang, David L K Murphy, Jessica Y Choi, Maya E Clinton, Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk, Angel V Peterchev, Stephan M Goetz
{"title":"Optimal asymmetric electric field pulses for selective transcranial magnetic stimulation with minimised power and coil heating.","authors":"Ke Ma, Andrey Vlasov, Zeynep B Simsek, Jinshui Zhang, Yiru Li, Boshuo Wang, David L K Murphy, Jessica Y Choi, Maya E Clinton, Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk, Angel V Peterchev, Stephan M Goetz","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with asymmetric electric field pulses, such as monophasic, offers directional selectivity for neural activation but requires excessive energy. Previous pulse shape optimisation has been limited to symmetric pulses or heavily constrained variations of conventional waveforms without achieving general optimality in energy efficiency or neural selectivity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to develop a minimally constrained optimisation framework for identifying energy-efficient asymmetric TMS pulses with directional selectivity of neural stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a novel optimisation framework that incorporates neuron model activation constraints and flexible control of pulse asymmetry. The optimised waveforms were experimentally validated against conventional and previously optimised pulses. We measured motor thresholds for conventional pulses as well as one of the optimised unidirectional rectangular (OUR) pulses and compared its MEP latency for anterior-posterior (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) electric field directions in six healthy human subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimised electric field waveforms had leading phases with a time constant of 280±15μs (mean±SD) and near-rectangular main stimulation phases. They achieved up to 92% and 88% reduction in energy loss and thus heating compared to conventional monophasic pulses and previously improved monophasic-equivalent pulses, respectively. In the human experiments, OUR pulses showed similar motor thresholds to monophasic pulses in both AP and PA directions whilst achieving significantly lower energy loss, particularly in the AP direction. Moreover, there was a significant MEP latency difference of 1.79±0.41ms (mean±SE) between AP and PA direction with OUR pulses, suggesting directional selectivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our framework successfully identified highly energy-efficient asymmetric pulses for directionally-selective neural engagement. These pulses can enable selective rapid-rate repetitive TMS protocols with reduced power consumption and coil heating, with potential benefits for precision and potency of neuromodulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.09.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with asymmetric electric field pulses, such as monophasic, offers directional selectivity for neural activation but requires excessive energy. Previous pulse shape optimisation has been limited to symmetric pulses or heavily constrained variations of conventional waveforms without achieving general optimality in energy efficiency or neural selectivity.

Objective: We sought to develop a minimally constrained optimisation framework for identifying energy-efficient asymmetric TMS pulses with directional selectivity of neural stimulation.

Methods: We implemented a novel optimisation framework that incorporates neuron model activation constraints and flexible control of pulse asymmetry. The optimised waveforms were experimentally validated against conventional and previously optimised pulses. We measured motor thresholds for conventional pulses as well as one of the optimised unidirectional rectangular (OUR) pulses and compared its MEP latency for anterior-posterior (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) electric field directions in six healthy human subjects.

Results: The optimised electric field waveforms had leading phases with a time constant of 280±15μs (mean±SD) and near-rectangular main stimulation phases. They achieved up to 92% and 88% reduction in energy loss and thus heating compared to conventional monophasic pulses and previously improved monophasic-equivalent pulses, respectively. In the human experiments, OUR pulses showed similar motor thresholds to monophasic pulses in both AP and PA directions whilst achieving significantly lower energy loss, particularly in the AP direction. Moreover, there was a significant MEP latency difference of 1.79±0.41ms (mean±SE) between AP and PA direction with OUR pulses, suggesting directional selectivity.

Conclusion: Our framework successfully identified highly energy-efficient asymmetric pulses for directionally-selective neural engagement. These pulses can enable selective rapid-rate repetitive TMS protocols with reduced power consumption and coil heating, with potential benefits for precision and potency of neuromodulation.

最佳非对称电场脉冲选择性经颅磁刺激与最小的功率和线圈加热。
背景:经颅磁刺激(TMS)具有非对称电场脉冲,如单相,为神经激活提供了定向选择性,但需要过多的能量。以前的脉冲形状优化仅限于对称脉冲或常规波形的严重约束变化,而没有实现能量效率或神经选择性的一般优化。目的:我们试图开发一个最小约束优化框架,用于识别具有神经刺激定向选择性的节能非对称经颅磁刺激脉冲。方法:我们实现了一个新的优化框架,该框架结合了神经元模型激活约束和脉冲不对称的灵活控制。通过实验验证了优化波形与常规脉冲和先前优化的脉冲的对比。我们测量了常规脉冲和一种优化的单向矩形(OUR)脉冲的运动阈值,并比较了6名健康受试者的前后(AP)和前后(PA)电场方向的MEP潜伏期。结果:优化后的电场波形具有时间常数为280±15μs (mean±SD)的先导相和接近矩形的主刺激相。与传统的单相脉冲和之前改进的单相等效脉冲相比,它们分别减少了92%和88%的能量损失和加热。在人体实验中,我们的脉冲在AP和PA方向上都表现出与单相脉冲相似的运动阈值,同时能量损失显著降低,尤其是在AP方向上。此外,在OUR脉冲作用下,AP和PA方向的MEP潜伏期差异为1.79±0.41ms(平均±SE),表明有方向选择性。结论:我们的框架成功识别了高能效的非对称脉冲,用于定向选择性神经接合。这些脉冲可以实现选择性快速重复TMS协议,降低功耗和线圈加热,具有神经调节的准确性和效力的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Stimulation
Brain Stimulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
256
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation. Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信