A comprehensive overview: deep learning approaches to central serous chorioretinopathy diagnosis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mohammad Shojaeinia, Azamossadat Hosseini, Mostafa Naderi, Bardia Baloutch, Mohammad Shokoohi Yekta, Leila Akbarpour, Hamid Moghaddasi
{"title":"A comprehensive overview: deep learning approaches to central serous chorioretinopathy diagnosis.","authors":"Mohammad Shojaeinia, Azamossadat Hosseini, Mostafa Naderi, Bardia Baloutch, Mohammad Shokoohi Yekta, Leila Akbarpour, Hamid Moghaddasi","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04372-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To synthesize evidence on deep learning applications for diagnosing central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), a macular disorder associated with vision loss, this systematic review categorized studies by diagnostic task and imaging modality. The study evaluates advances in deep learning performance, clinical integration potential, dataset limitations, and the contributions of multimodal imaging and Explainable AI (XAI) to diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore, including peer-reviewed English-language studies published from January 1990 to February 2024 that reported quantitative deep learning metrics for CSCR diagnosis. A two-stage selection process was applied (Cohen's κ = 0.84), resulting in 96 studies for analysis. Risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool, and data were synthesized by imaging modality, model architecture, and diagnostic task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Deep learning models demonstrate exceptional performance in CSCR diagnosis. DenseNet architectures applied to optical coherence tomography (OCT) images achieved peak Metrics, including 99.78% accuracy, 99.68% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. Segmentation models for subretinal fluid (SRF) reported Dice scores of up to 0.965, while multimodal models for differential diagnosis achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.999. Despite these advances, clinical adoption remains limited by several challenges: scarce and imbalanced datasets (e.g., SRF/non-SRF ratio of 1:8), lack of open-access datasets and models, risks of overfitting, and insufficient external validation. Emerging approaches, such as few-shot learning and diffusion models, are promising for mitigating data constraints; however, improvements in dataset quality and the implementation of rigorous cross-institutional validation are essential for real-world deployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By leveraging OCT and multimodal imaging data, deep learning has the potential to transform CSCR diagnosis through enhanced accuracy and automation. However, translating these advances into routine clinical practice necessitates overcoming key challenges, including limited and heterogeneous datasets and models with restricted generalizability. Future research should prioritize standardized reporting frameworks, transparent model interpretability through XAI, and rigorous large-scale validation. Essential strategies include employing federated learning to leverage distributed data, implementing effective multimodal fusion techniques, and fostering collaborative frameworks to improve diagnostic accuracy, ensure algorithmic fairness, and enable real-world clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04372-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To synthesize evidence on deep learning applications for diagnosing central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), a macular disorder associated with vision loss, this systematic review categorized studies by diagnostic task and imaging modality. The study evaluates advances in deep learning performance, clinical integration potential, dataset limitations, and the contributions of multimodal imaging and Explainable AI (XAI) to diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making.

Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore, including peer-reviewed English-language studies published from January 1990 to February 2024 that reported quantitative deep learning metrics for CSCR diagnosis. A two-stage selection process was applied (Cohen's κ = 0.84), resulting in 96 studies for analysis. Risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool, and data were synthesized by imaging modality, model architecture, and diagnostic task.

Results: Deep learning models demonstrate exceptional performance in CSCR diagnosis. DenseNet architectures applied to optical coherence tomography (OCT) images achieved peak Metrics, including 99.78% accuracy, 99.68% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. Segmentation models for subretinal fluid (SRF) reported Dice scores of up to 0.965, while multimodal models for differential diagnosis achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.999. Despite these advances, clinical adoption remains limited by several challenges: scarce and imbalanced datasets (e.g., SRF/non-SRF ratio of 1:8), lack of open-access datasets and models, risks of overfitting, and insufficient external validation. Emerging approaches, such as few-shot learning and diffusion models, are promising for mitigating data constraints; however, improvements in dataset quality and the implementation of rigorous cross-institutional validation are essential for real-world deployment.

Conclusions: By leveraging OCT and multimodal imaging data, deep learning has the potential to transform CSCR diagnosis through enhanced accuracy and automation. However, translating these advances into routine clinical practice necessitates overcoming key challenges, including limited and heterogeneous datasets and models with restricted generalizability. Future research should prioritize standardized reporting frameworks, transparent model interpretability through XAI, and rigorous large-scale validation. Essential strategies include employing federated learning to leverage distributed data, implementing effective multimodal fusion techniques, and fostering collaborative frameworks to improve diagnostic accuracy, ensure algorithmic fairness, and enable real-world clinical applicability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

全面概述:深度学习方法对中央浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的诊断。
目的:为了综合深度学习在诊断中央浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)中的应用证据,本系统综述根据诊断任务和成像方式对研究进行了分类。该研究评估了深度学习性能、临床整合潜力、数据集局限性以及多模态成像和可解释人工智能(XAI)对诊断准确性和临床决策的贡献。方法:我们对PubMed、Scopus和IEEE Xplore进行了符合prisma标准的系统评价,包括1990年1月至2024年2月发表的同行评审的英语研究,这些研究报告了CSCR诊断的定量深度学习指标。采用两阶段选择过程(Cohen’s κ = 0.84),共96项研究进行分析。使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险,并根据成像方式、模型架构和诊断任务综合数据。结果:深度学习模型在CSCR诊断中表现出优异的性能。应用于光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像的DenseNet架构达到了峰值指标,包括99.78%的准确率,99.68%的灵敏度和100%的特异性。视网膜下液(SRF)分割模型的Dice得分高达0.965,而用于鉴别诊断的多模态模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.999。尽管取得了这些进展,但临床应用仍然受到以下几个挑战的限制:稀缺和不平衡的数据集(例如,SRF/非SRF比例为1:8),缺乏开放获取的数据集和模型,过度拟合的风险,以及外部验证不足。一些新兴的方法,如少量学习和扩散模型,有望缓解数据约束;然而,数据集质量的提高和严格的跨机构验证的实施对于现实世界的部署至关重要。结论:通过利用OCT和多模态成像数据,深度学习有可能通过提高准确性和自动化来改变CSCR诊断。然而,将这些进步转化为常规临床实践需要克服一些关键挑战,包括有限和异构的数据集和模型,其通用性受到限制。未来的研究应该优先考虑标准化的报告框架,通过XAI透明的模型可解释性,以及严格的大规模验证。基本策略包括使用联邦学习来利用分布式数据,实现有效的多模态融合技术,以及促进协作框架以提高诊断准确性,确保算法公平性,并使现实世界的临床适用性成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信