Value of preoperative blocked bone visualization marking on arthroscopic arthroplasty for degenerative elbow stiffness: minimum three-year follow-up.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Wenzhi Bi, Yanlong Liu, Yanbo Wang, Honglin Cui, Wei Ma, Dongqiang Yang, Pengfei Fu, Biao Guo, Jian Xu
{"title":"Value of preoperative blocked bone visualization marking on arthroscopic arthroplasty for degenerative elbow stiffness: minimum three-year follow-up.","authors":"Wenzhi Bi, Yanlong Liu, Yanbo Wang, Honglin Cui, Wei Ma, Dongqiang Yang, Pengfei Fu, Biao Guo, Jian Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-09191-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complete removal of the blocked bone is the key to achieving reliable curative effects in arthroscopic arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative elbow stiffness. However, there is currently a lack of a comprehensive assessment of the blocked bone before surgery, and simulation software and 3D-printed models seem to provide an excellent solution. Through a minimum three-year follow-up, the value of preoperative blocked bone visualization marking on arthroscopic arthroplasty for degenerative elbow stiffness will be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis was conducted at our hospital, and data from 23 patients with degenerative elbow stiffness who underwent arthroscopic arthroplasty between March 2020 and March 2022 were initially collected. 12 patients who used simulation software and a 3D-printed model marked with elbow blocked bone were divided into a trial group. And 11 patients who were without that were the control group. The elbow range of motion (ROM) and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were compared before surgery and at the last follow-up, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients' surgeries were successfully performed. The follow-up period was a minimum of three years. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in age, sex, affected side, MEPS, extension ROM, and flexion ROM between the two groups (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in MEPS (P > 0.05). The trial group had better extension ROM, flexion ROM, and the total extension and flexion ROM (TROM) gains than the control group (P < 0.05). Except for one case of transient ulnar nerve injury in the control group, the remaining patients had no complications, such as infection or joint effusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of preoperative blocked bone visualization marking helped make arthroscopic arthroplasty for degenerative elbow stiffness more accurate, gain better ROM, and its value is worthy of affirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09191-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The complete removal of the blocked bone is the key to achieving reliable curative effects in arthroscopic arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative elbow stiffness. However, there is currently a lack of a comprehensive assessment of the blocked bone before surgery, and simulation software and 3D-printed models seem to provide an excellent solution. Through a minimum three-year follow-up, the value of preoperative blocked bone visualization marking on arthroscopic arthroplasty for degenerative elbow stiffness will be evaluated.

Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted at our hospital, and data from 23 patients with degenerative elbow stiffness who underwent arthroscopic arthroplasty between March 2020 and March 2022 were initially collected. 12 patients who used simulation software and a 3D-printed model marked with elbow blocked bone were divided into a trial group. And 11 patients who were without that were the control group. The elbow range of motion (ROM) and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were compared before surgery and at the last follow-up, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated.

Results: All the patients' surgeries were successfully performed. The follow-up period was a minimum of three years. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in age, sex, affected side, MEPS, extension ROM, and flexion ROM between the two groups (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in MEPS (P > 0.05). The trial group had better extension ROM, flexion ROM, and the total extension and flexion ROM (TROM) gains than the control group (P < 0.05). Except for one case of transient ulnar nerve injury in the control group, the remaining patients had no complications, such as infection or joint effusion.

Conclusion: The application of preoperative blocked bone visualization marking helped make arthroscopic arthroplasty for degenerative elbow stiffness more accurate, gain better ROM, and its value is worthy of affirmation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

关节镜下关节置换术治疗退行性肘关节僵硬的术前阻断骨可视化标记的价值:至少三年随访。
背景:在关节镜下关节置换术治疗退行性肘关节僵硬时,完全去除阻塞骨是获得可靠疗效的关键。然而,目前在手术前缺乏对阻塞骨的全面评估,模拟软件和3d打印模型似乎提供了一个很好的解决方案。通过至少三年的随访,将评估关节镜下关节置换术治疗退行性肘关节僵硬的术前阻塞骨可视化标记的价值。方法:在我院进行回顾性分析,初步收集2020年3月至2022年3月期间接受关节镜置换术的23例退行性肘关节僵硬患者的数据。12例患者采用模拟软件和3d打印模型标记肘关节堵骨,分为试验组。11个没有注射的病人是对照组。比较术前和末次随访时肘关节活动度(ROM)和Mayo肘关节功能评分(MEPS),并评价治疗效果。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术。随访期至少为三年。术前,两组患者年龄、性别、患侧、MEPS、伸、屈ROM差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。末次随访时,两组MEPS差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与对照组相比,实验组有更好的屈曲、伸曲、总屈曲ROM (TROM)增益(P)。结论:术前应用闭塞骨可视化标记有助于关节镜下关节置换术治疗退行性肘关节僵硬更准确,获得更好的ROM,其价值值得肯定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信