Enhanced diagnostic performance for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel criterion integrating serum AFP levels and gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI features.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xuying Chen, Haoran Dai, Jing Liu, Siyuan Ji, Yuyao Xiao, Xinde Zheng, Kai Hou, Chun Yang
{"title":"Enhanced diagnostic performance for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel criterion integrating serum AFP levels and gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI features.","authors":"Xuying Chen, Haoran Dai, Jing Liu, Siyuan Ji, Yuyao Xiao, Xinde Zheng, Kai Hou, Chun Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01949-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of LI-RADS v2018 and r-LI-RADS in diagnosing subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate the potential value of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in conjunction with gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) for assessing these lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 179 untreated, high-risk patients with microlesions (< 1 cm) from 2015 to 2023. Of these, 92 lesions were pathologically confirmed as HCC, the remaining 87 were non-HCC. Two radiologists independently rated imaging features using LI-RADS and r-LI-RADS. The optimal AFP threshold for HCC diagnosis was determined by the Youden index. Logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors of micro-HCC, leading to the development of new diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis identified AFP > 12.15 ng/mL, non-peripheral arterial phase enhancement, diffusion restriction, fat deposition, and enhancing capsule as key independent factors for diagnosing micro-HCC. A new criterion requiring at least three positive factors improved sensitivity to 78.3% vs. 58.7% for LR-4 (p = 0.001), with similar specificity (83.9% vs. 81.6%, p = 0.824). It also outperformed r-LR-5/4 and r-LR-4 in sensitivity (78.3% vs. 59.8% and 58.7%, both p = 0.001), without impacting specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A new criterion (at least three positive findings among AFP > 12.15 ng/mL, non-peripheral arterial phase enhancement, diffusion restriction, fat deposition, and enhancing capsule) significantly improves the diagnostic sensitivity for subcentimeter HCC while maintaining high specificity, demonstrating clear advantages over the LR-4, r-LR-5/4, and r-LR-4 standards of LI-RADS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"404"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01949-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of LI-RADS v2018 and r-LI-RADS in diagnosing subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate the potential value of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in conjunction with gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) for assessing these lesions.

Methods: This retrospective study included 179 untreated, high-risk patients with microlesions (< 1 cm) from 2015 to 2023. Of these, 92 lesions were pathologically confirmed as HCC, the remaining 87 were non-HCC. Two radiologists independently rated imaging features using LI-RADS and r-LI-RADS. The optimal AFP threshold for HCC diagnosis was determined by the Youden index. Logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors of micro-HCC, leading to the development of new diagnostic criteria.

Results: Multivariate analysis identified AFP > 12.15 ng/mL, non-peripheral arterial phase enhancement, diffusion restriction, fat deposition, and enhancing capsule as key independent factors for diagnosing micro-HCC. A new criterion requiring at least three positive factors improved sensitivity to 78.3% vs. 58.7% for LR-4 (p = 0.001), with similar specificity (83.9% vs. 81.6%, p = 0.824). It also outperformed r-LR-5/4 and r-LR-4 in sensitivity (78.3% vs. 59.8% and 58.7%, both p = 0.001), without impacting specificity.

Conclusion: A new criterion (at least three positive findings among AFP > 12.15 ng/mL, non-peripheral arterial phase enhancement, diffusion restriction, fat deposition, and enhancing capsule) significantly improves the diagnostic sensitivity for subcentimeter HCC while maintaining high specificity, demonstrating clear advantages over the LR-4, r-LR-5/4, and r-LR-4 standards of LI-RADS.

结合血清AFP水平和基于钆的对比增强MRI特征的新标准提高了亚厘米肝细胞癌的诊断性能。
目的:评估LI-RADS v2018和r-LI-RADS诊断亚厘米肝细胞癌(HCC)的有效性,并评估血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)联合钆基对比增强MRI (CE-MRI)评估这些病变的潜在价值。方法:回顾性研究纳入179例未经治疗的高危微病变患者。结果:多因素分析发现,AFP > 12.15 ng/mL、非外周动脉期增强、扩散受限、脂肪沉积、强化胶囊是诊断微hcc的关键独立因素。要求至少三个阳性因素的新标准将LR-4的敏感性提高到78.3%比58.7% (p = 0.001),特异性相似(83.9%比81.6%,p = 0.824)。它在敏感性上也优于r-LR-5/4和r-LR-4 (78.3% vs. 59.8%和58.7%,p均= 0.001),但不影响特异性。结论:新标准(AFP > 12.15 ng/mL,非外周动脉期增强,扩散限制,脂肪沉积,增强胶囊中至少有三项阳性结果)显著提高了亚厘米级HCC的诊断敏感性,同时保持了高特异性,明显优于LI-RADS的LR-4, r-LR-5/4和r-LR-4标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信