Multiobjective Numerical Analysis of Thermal and Fluid Dynamics Performance of a Vertical Helical Earth–Air Heat Exchanger Using the TOPSIS Method

IF 2.6 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1002/htj.70022
Andre Luis Razera, Igor Silva Vaz, Roberta Juliana Collet da Fonseca, Michel Kepes Rodrigues, Luiz Alberto Oliveira Rocha, Elizaldo Domingues dos Santos, Liércio André Isoldi
{"title":"Multiobjective Numerical Analysis of Thermal and Fluid Dynamics Performance of a Vertical Helical Earth–Air Heat Exchanger Using the TOPSIS Method","authors":"Andre Luis Razera,&nbsp;Igor Silva Vaz,&nbsp;Roberta Juliana Collet da Fonseca,&nbsp;Michel Kepes Rodrigues,&nbsp;Luiz Alberto Oliveira Rocha,&nbsp;Elizaldo Domingues dos Santos,&nbsp;Liércio André Isoldi","doi":"10.1002/htj.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present work numerically investigates an Earth–Air Heat Exchanger (EAHE) of the vertical helical (VH) type, with regard to the prevailing climate and soil attributes of Rio Grande city, in southern Brazil, through the variation of its pitch between the helicoids (<i>P</i><sub>h</sub>), with constant air flow and soil conditions. The goals are to maximize the Thermal Potential (<i>TP</i>) and minimize the Pressure Drop (<i>PD</i>) of the EAHE-VH, that is, it is a problem involving multiobjectives. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is employed for multiobjective evaluation, and its application is assessed in relation to the results of the Coefficient of Performance (<i>COP</i>) and the Energy Performance Indicator (<i>EPI</i>). The problem is numerically solved using ANSYS FLUENT package, through verified and validated computational models of thermal and fluid dynamics approaches. Among the evaluated <i>P</i><sub>h</sub> values, the configuration with <i>P</i><sub>h</sub> = 100 mm delivered the best <i>TP</i> for both cooling and heating, achieving gains of up to 20% compared with the least favorable geometry (<i>P</i><sub>h</sub> = 400 mm), thereby highlighting the significant influence of the helical pitch on system performance. Conversely, the configuration with <i>P</i><sub>h</sub> = 400 mm demonstrated the best performance in terms of <i>PD</i>, with a reduction of approximately 65.33%. The TOPSIS method effectively identified the optimal geometry with a balanced performance between <i>TP</i> and <i>PD</i>, with <i>P</i><sub>h</sub> = 300 mm being ideal when both are equally prioritized. In contrast to the evaluations based on <i>COP</i> and <i>EPI</i>, the TOPSIS method demonstrated superior comprehensiveness and flexibility, enabling the identification of optimal configurations aligned with distinct operational priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"54 7","pages":"4689-4707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/htj.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.70022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work numerically investigates an Earth–Air Heat Exchanger (EAHE) of the vertical helical (VH) type, with regard to the prevailing climate and soil attributes of Rio Grande city, in southern Brazil, through the variation of its pitch between the helicoids (Ph), with constant air flow and soil conditions. The goals are to maximize the Thermal Potential (TP) and minimize the Pressure Drop (PD) of the EAHE-VH, that is, it is a problem involving multiobjectives. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is employed for multiobjective evaluation, and its application is assessed in relation to the results of the Coefficient of Performance (COP) and the Energy Performance Indicator (EPI). The problem is numerically solved using ANSYS FLUENT package, through verified and validated computational models of thermal and fluid dynamics approaches. Among the evaluated Ph values, the configuration with Ph = 100 mm delivered the best TP for both cooling and heating, achieving gains of up to 20% compared with the least favorable geometry (Ph = 400 mm), thereby highlighting the significant influence of the helical pitch on system performance. Conversely, the configuration with Ph = 400 mm demonstrated the best performance in terms of PD, with a reduction of approximately 65.33%. The TOPSIS method effectively identified the optimal geometry with a balanced performance between TP and PD, with Ph = 300 mm being ideal when both are equally prioritized. In contrast to the evaluations based on COP and EPI, the TOPSIS method demonstrated superior comprehensiveness and flexibility, enabling the identification of optimal configurations aligned with distinct operational priorities.

Abstract Image

基于TOPSIS方法的垂直螺旋式地-空气换热器热流体力学性能多目标数值分析
在恒定气流和土壤条件下,通过螺距(Ph值)的变化,对巴西南部里约热内卢Grande市的主要气候和土壤属性进行了垂直螺旋(VH)型地球-空气热交换器(EAHE)的数值研究。EAHE-VH的目标是使热势(TP)最大化,压降(PD)最小化,这是一个涉及多目标的问题。采用TOPSIS (Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)方法进行多目标评价,并结合绩效系数(COP)和能源绩效指标(EPI)的结果对其应用进行评价。利用ANSYS FLUENT软件包,通过验证和验证了热学和流体力学方法的计算模型,对问题进行了数值求解。在评估的Ph值中,Ph = 100 mm的配置提供了最佳的冷却和加热TP,与最不利的几何形状(Ph = 400 mm)相比,获得了高达20%的增益,从而突出了螺旋节距对系统性能的显着影响。相反,Ph = 400 mm的配置在PD方面表现出最佳性能,降低了约65.33%。TOPSIS方法有效地确定了在TP和PD之间具有平衡性能的最佳几何形状,当Ph = 300 mm时,两者的优先级相同。与基于COP和EPI的评价相比,TOPSIS方法表现出更强的全面性和灵活性,能够识别与不同操作优先级一致的最佳配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信