An Ethical Framework to Clinical Post-Mortem Examination in Saudi Arabia

IF 1.1 Q3 ETHICS
Ruaim Muaygil, Khaldoon Aljerian
{"title":"An Ethical Framework to Clinical Post-Mortem Examination in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Ruaim Muaygil,&nbsp;Khaldoon Aljerian","doi":"10.1007/s41649-024-00331-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Post-mortem examinations (PME) often yield valuable information regarding the cause and manner of death. They aid in identifying underlying disease, support public health efforts, and inform criminal investigations. In the clinical context, PME improves understanding of disease processes, prevents future illness in others, and provides comfort and closure to families. In Saudi Arabia, a multitude of cultural, religious, and ethical concerns often preclude frank discussions and contribute to the reluctance of both families and practitioners to pursue these examinations. In this paper, we contend that clinical PME should be routinely offered to family members after the unexplained death of an individual. To that end, we propose a religiously informed and culturally sensitive ethical framework, one that is cognizant of local cultural, ethical, and religious needs. We begin with an overview of PME, its development, and its current state in Saudi Arabia. Next, we examine the cultural, religious, and ethical challenges that contribute to the underutilization of PME. Finally, we address these challenges through our proposed framework in the hope that a more representative approach to PME will permit more utilization and benefit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44520,"journal":{"name":"Asian Bioethics Review","volume":"17 4","pages":"753 - 764"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41649-024-00331-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-mortem examinations (PME) often yield valuable information regarding the cause and manner of death. They aid in identifying underlying disease, support public health efforts, and inform criminal investigations. In the clinical context, PME improves understanding of disease processes, prevents future illness in others, and provides comfort and closure to families. In Saudi Arabia, a multitude of cultural, religious, and ethical concerns often preclude frank discussions and contribute to the reluctance of both families and practitioners to pursue these examinations. In this paper, we contend that clinical PME should be routinely offered to family members after the unexplained death of an individual. To that end, we propose a religiously informed and culturally sensitive ethical framework, one that is cognizant of local cultural, ethical, and religious needs. We begin with an overview of PME, its development, and its current state in Saudi Arabia. Next, we examine the cultural, religious, and ethical challenges that contribute to the underutilization of PME. Finally, we address these challenges through our proposed framework in the hope that a more representative approach to PME will permit more utilization and benefit.

沙特阿拉伯临床尸检的伦理框架
尸检通常能提供有关死因和死亡方式的宝贵信息。它们有助于识别潜在疾病,支持公共卫生工作,并为刑事调查提供信息。在临床环境中,PME提高了对疾病过程的理解,防止他人未来患病,并为家庭提供安慰和封闭。在沙特阿拉伯,众多的文化、宗教和伦理问题往往阻碍了坦率的讨论,导致家庭和医生都不愿进行这些检查。在本文中,我们认为临床PME应定期提供给家庭成员后,一个人的不明原因的死亡。为此,我们提出了一个宗教知情和文化敏感的伦理框架,一个认识到当地文化、伦理和宗教需求的伦理框架。我们首先概述PME,它的发展,以及它在沙特阿拉伯的现状。接下来,我们将探讨导致PME未充分利用的文化、宗教和伦理挑战。最后,我们通过我们提出的框架来解决这些挑战,希望一个更具代表性的PME方法将允许更多的利用和收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Asian Bioethics Review (ABR) is an international academic journal, based in Asia, providing a forum to express and exchange original ideas on all aspects of bioethics, especially those relevant to the region. Published quarterly, the journal seeks to promote collaborative research among scholars in Asia or with an interest in Asia, as well as multi-cultural and multi-disciplinary bioethical studies more generally. It will appeal to all working on bioethical issues in biomedicine, healthcare, caregiving and patient support, genetics, law and governance, health systems and policy, science studies and research. ABR provides analyses, perspectives and insights into new approaches in bioethics, recent changes in biomedical law and policy, developments in capacity building and professional training, and voices or essays from a student’s perspective. The journal includes articles, research studies, target articles, case evaluations and commentaries. It also publishes book reviews and correspondence to the editor. ABR welcomes original papers from all countries, particularly those that relate to Asia. ABR is the flagship publication of the Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore. The Centre for Biomedical Ethics is a collaborating centre on bioethics of the World Health Organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信