Algorithme thérapeutique des CBNPC sans anomalie moléculaire actionnable au-delà de la première ligne

Q4 Medicine
M. Pérol , D. Moro-Sibilot
{"title":"Algorithme thérapeutique des CBNPC sans anomalie moléculaire actionnable au-delà de la première ligne","authors":"M. Pérol ,&nbsp;D. Moro-Sibilot","doi":"10.1016/S1877-1203(25)00073-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the improved results of first-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma with anti PD-(L)1, the majority of patients continue to experience disease progression, reflecting primary or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. “Second-line” treatment follows anti PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, administered either sequentially or concomitantly. The multiplicity of mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy makes it difficult to identify them at the level of a given patient; the majority of therapeutic strategies developed in the second-line setting are therefore agnostic of the mechanism of resistance to immunotherapy. Despite the development of numerous innovative strategies, treatment remains based on cytotoxic chemotherapy, mainly taxanes as monotherapy or combined with anti-angiogenic agents. It remains important to check the absence of genomic or phenotypic alterations that could be accessible to a specific treatment, particularly in the context of a clinical trial. For the time being, the development of conjugated antibodies has not transformed the second-line strategy, and is now mainly conducted in the first-line setting. Rechallenge with immunotherapy can only be envisaged after anti PD-(L)1 has been discontinued due to toxicity, or after the scheduled end of first-line treatment, after a free interval. New strategies are currently being studied to overcome primary or acquired resistance to immunotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53645,"journal":{"name":"Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualites","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 2S160-2S170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualites","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877120325000734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the improved results of first-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma with anti PD-(L)1, the majority of patients continue to experience disease progression, reflecting primary or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. “Second-line” treatment follows anti PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, administered either sequentially or concomitantly. The multiplicity of mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy makes it difficult to identify them at the level of a given patient; the majority of therapeutic strategies developed in the second-line setting are therefore agnostic of the mechanism of resistance to immunotherapy. Despite the development of numerous innovative strategies, treatment remains based on cytotoxic chemotherapy, mainly taxanes as monotherapy or combined with anti-angiogenic agents. It remains important to check the absence of genomic or phenotypic alterations that could be accessible to a specific treatment, particularly in the context of a clinical trial. For the time being, the development of conjugated antibodies has not transformed the second-line strategy, and is now mainly conducted in the first-line setting. Rechallenge with immunotherapy can only be envisaged after anti PD-(L)1 has been discontinued due to toxicity, or after the scheduled end of first-line treatment, after a free interval. New strategies are currently being studied to overcome primary or acquired resistance to immunotherapy.
无分子异常的CBNPC治疗算法,可在一线以外操作
尽管抗PD-(L)1治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗效果有所改善,但大多数患者继续经历疾病进展,反映了对免疫治疗的原发性或获得性耐药。“二线”治疗是在抗PD-(L)1免疫治疗和铂基双重化疗之后,依次或同时给予。免疫治疗耐药机制的多样性使得很难在给定患者的水平上识别它们;因此,在二线环境中开发的大多数治疗策略都无法确定免疫治疗耐药性的机制。尽管发展了许多创新策略,但治疗仍然基于细胞毒性化疗,主要是紫杉烷单药治疗或与抗血管生成药物联合治疗。重要的是要检查是否存在基因组或表型的改变,这些改变可以用于特定的治疗,特别是在临床试验的背景下。目前,偶联抗体的发展还没有改变二线策略,目前主要是在一线环境中进行。只有在抗PD-(L)1因毒性而停用后,或在预定的一线治疗结束后,经过一段自由间隔后,才能设想免疫治疗的重新挑战。目前正在研究新的策略来克服对免疫治疗的原发性或获得性耐药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualites
Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualites Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
671
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书