{"title":"Milk feeding through an open bucket or nipple bucket: Performance and behavior of dairy calves","authors":"M.D. Silva , M.G. Coelho , A.P. Silva , A.F. Toledo , A.M. Cezar , S.C. Dondé , C.R. Tomaluski , F.Z. Miranda , R.Y.L. Ricci , C.M.M. Bittar","doi":"10.15232/aas.2025-02675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study compared the performance and behavior of dairy calves using 2 different milk feeding methods: open bucket and nipple bucket.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Thirty newborn Holstein calves were blocked and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 milk feeding methods: (1) open bucket (n = 15) or (2) nipple bucket (n = 15). Calves were individually housed with <em>ad libitum</em> access to water and pelleted starter. Calves were fed 6 L/d of whole milk divided into 2 meals for 8 wk of life. Starter intake was recorded daily. Body weight and metabolic parameters were recorded weekly. Calf behavior was recorded weekly from wk 2 to 8 of life.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>All calves consumed their al- located milk; however, the nipple bucket feeding decreased starter intake and consequently total DMI (1,067.8 and 964.3 ± 27.08 [SEM] g/d), with no effect on ADG or BW. The average fecal score was greater for calves fed with an open bucket, reflecting more fluid feces (1.85 and 1.59 ± 0.071). Calves fed with a nipple bucket presented greater glucose concentration levels 2 h after feeding (121.1 and 131.5 ± 3.95 mg/dL), but the protein, albumin, and he- matocrit were not affected. Milk intake speed was great- er for calves fed with a nipple bucket (1.86 and 5.33 ± 0.233, min/3 L). Calves fed with a nipple bucket spent less time eating starter (3.71 and 1.92 ± 0.311, min/4 h) and performing non-nutritive oral behavior (1.09 and 0.58 ± 0.212, min/4 h); however, they spent more time consum- ing milk (7.01 ± 0.224, min/4 h).</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>The milk feeding method has a short-term positive influence on calves’ pre- weaning behavior, although it does not affect performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 5","pages":"Pages 448-457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286525000710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study compared the performance and behavior of dairy calves using 2 different milk feeding methods: open bucket and nipple bucket.
Materials and Methods
Thirty newborn Holstein calves were blocked and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 milk feeding methods: (1) open bucket (n = 15) or (2) nipple bucket (n = 15). Calves were individually housed with ad libitum access to water and pelleted starter. Calves were fed 6 L/d of whole milk divided into 2 meals for 8 wk of life. Starter intake was recorded daily. Body weight and metabolic parameters were recorded weekly. Calf behavior was recorded weekly from wk 2 to 8 of life.
Results and Discussion
All calves consumed their al- located milk; however, the nipple bucket feeding decreased starter intake and consequently total DMI (1,067.8 and 964.3 ± 27.08 [SEM] g/d), with no effect on ADG or BW. The average fecal score was greater for calves fed with an open bucket, reflecting more fluid feces (1.85 and 1.59 ± 0.071). Calves fed with a nipple bucket presented greater glucose concentration levels 2 h after feeding (121.1 and 131.5 ± 3.95 mg/dL), but the protein, albumin, and he- matocrit were not affected. Milk intake speed was great- er for calves fed with a nipple bucket (1.86 and 5.33 ± 0.233, min/3 L). Calves fed with a nipple bucket spent less time eating starter (3.71 and 1.92 ± 0.311, min/4 h) and performing non-nutritive oral behavior (1.09 and 0.58 ± 0.212, min/4 h); however, they spent more time consum- ing milk (7.01 ± 0.224, min/4 h).
Implications and Applications
The milk feeding method has a short-term positive influence on calves’ pre- weaning behavior, although it does not affect performance.