Ali Azizi,Douglas R da Costa,Rafael Scherer,Davina A Malek,Gustavo A Samico,Felipe A Medeiros
{"title":"RNFL Thickness in a Population-Based Cohort: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging M2M (Machine-to-Machine) Study.","authors":"Ali Azizi,Douglas R da Costa,Rafael Scherer,Davina A Malek,Gustavo A Samico,Felipe A Medeiros","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo evaluate factors associated with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) using the Machine-to-Machine (M2M) deep learning model applied to fundus photographs.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nCross-sectional study.\r\n\r\nSUBJECTS\r\nParticipants from the baseline Comprehensive Cohort of the CLSA.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis study included 28,114 CLSA participants aged 45-85 years with gradable baseline fundus photographs. The M2M model, trained on optical coherence tomography (OCT) data, was applied to estimate RNFL thickness from disc-centered fundus images. For participants with images from both eyes, the mean RNFL thickness of the two eyes was used. Associations between M2M-predicted RNFL thickness and age, sex, ethnicity/race, and self-reported glaucoma were analyzed using linear regression models adjusted for covariates.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nM2M-predicted RNFL thickness, age, age groups, sex, ethnicity/race, and self-reported glaucoma.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe mean age of participants was 62.6 ± 10.1 years, and 51% were women. Self-reported glaucoma was present in 4.8% of the participants. The mean M2M-predicted RNFL thickness was 90.9 ± 9.2 µm. Age was inversely associated with RNFL thickness (Pearson's r = -0.16; p < 0.001), with each additional year associated with a 0.15 µm decrease (p < 0.001); after adjustment for covariates, the association remained significant (β = -0.11; p < 0.001). Participants with self-reported glaucoma exhibited significantly thinner RNFL (82.6 ± 12.9 µm) compared to those without (91.4 ± 8.7 µm; p < 0.001). RNFL thickness was slightly greater in women than in men (p < 0.001), and differences were observed across ethnicity/race groups (p < 0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe M2M model provided robust estimates of RNFL thickness from fundus photographs in a large population-based cohort. The observed associations between RNFL thickness, age, and glaucoma status were consistent with previous OCT-based findings, supporting the utility of the model for scalable structural assessments in epidemiological studies.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
To evaluate factors associated with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) using the Machine-to-Machine (M2M) deep learning model applied to fundus photographs.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS
Participants from the baseline Comprehensive Cohort of the CLSA.
METHODS
This study included 28,114 CLSA participants aged 45-85 years with gradable baseline fundus photographs. The M2M model, trained on optical coherence tomography (OCT) data, was applied to estimate RNFL thickness from disc-centered fundus images. For participants with images from both eyes, the mean RNFL thickness of the two eyes was used. Associations between M2M-predicted RNFL thickness and age, sex, ethnicity/race, and self-reported glaucoma were analyzed using linear regression models adjusted for covariates.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
M2M-predicted RNFL thickness, age, age groups, sex, ethnicity/race, and self-reported glaucoma.
RESULTS
The mean age of participants was 62.6 ± 10.1 years, and 51% were women. Self-reported glaucoma was present in 4.8% of the participants. The mean M2M-predicted RNFL thickness was 90.9 ± 9.2 µm. Age was inversely associated with RNFL thickness (Pearson's r = -0.16; p < 0.001), with each additional year associated with a 0.15 µm decrease (p < 0.001); after adjustment for covariates, the association remained significant (β = -0.11; p < 0.001). Participants with self-reported glaucoma exhibited significantly thinner RNFL (82.6 ± 12.9 µm) compared to those without (91.4 ± 8.7 µm; p < 0.001). RNFL thickness was slightly greater in women than in men (p < 0.001), and differences were observed across ethnicity/race groups (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The M2M model provided robust estimates of RNFL thickness from fundus photographs in a large population-based cohort. The observed associations between RNFL thickness, age, and glaucoma status were consistent with previous OCT-based findings, supporting the utility of the model for scalable structural assessments in epidemiological studies.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.