Development and Validation of a Commercially Available Two Color Dark Adapted Perimetry to Assess Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mark E Pennesi,Alessia Amato,Wayne Tschetter,Ryan Schmidt,Austin D Igelman,David G Birch,Leah D Bennett,Lesley A Everett,Paul Yang,Samuel J Huang
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Commercially Available Two Color Dark Adapted Perimetry to Assess Inherited Retinal Degenerations.","authors":"Mark E Pennesi,Alessia Amato,Wayne Tschetter,Ryan Schmidt,Austin D Igelman,David G Birch,Leah D Bennett,Lesley A Everett,Paul Yang,Samuel J Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThis study aimed to develop and validate a commercially available two-color dark-adapted full field perimetry (2cDAP) protocol to assess rod and cone function in patients with inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs), specifically retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The goal was to establish a widely accessible and reproducible method for measuring rod function for use in evaluating treatment efficacy in clinical trials.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe developed a 2cDAP protocol using the Octopus 900 Pro perimeter to measure thresholds to 450 nm (blue) and 610 nm (red) stimuli under dark-adapted conditions. The spectral sensitivity difference (SSD) between the stimuli was calculated to determine rod and cone mediation. A cohort of 35 RP patients and 14 normally sighted subjects underwent 2cDAP and standard light-adapted perimetry (LAP) across a standardized 78-point grid. Longitudinal data were collected from 12 RP patients over 12 months.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n2cDAP demonstrated high repeatability in normally sighted subjects and consistent results across institutions. For normally sighted subjects, testing time was approximately 14.1 minutes for the red stimulus, 14.5 minutes for the blue stimulus, and 13.1 minutes for LAP. The testing time for patients with RP was approximately 13.3 minutes for the red stimulus, 13.2 minutes for the blue stimulus, and 12.1 minutes for LAP. The method detected rod-mediated function in retinal regions undetectable by LAP. Longitudinal data showed faster progression rates in rod-mediated loci compared to cone-mediated loci when measured under scotopic with a blue or red stimulus compared to standard white stimuli in mesopic conditions. For dark adapted blue stimuli, the drop in mean sensitivity was from 25.8 dB to 20.4 dB in a year (a -5.4 dB change), compared to the dark adapted red stimulus where mean sensitivity changed from 17.3 dB to 16.9 dB (a -0.4 dB change) and light adapted perimetry with the white stimulus where mean sensitivity changed from 15.6 dB to 14.2 dB (a -1.4 dB change). These findings underscore the utility of 2cDAP in capturing early rod function loss, which is critical for evaluating emerging treatments.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur 2cDAP protocol provides a robust, spatially resolved assessment of photoreceptor function in IRDs. Its ability to differentiate rod and cone contributions, coupled with its accessibility on commercially available equipment, makes it a promising tool for multicenter clinical trials. Future work will focus on refining the protocol, expanding normative databases, and validating the method in larger patient cohorts.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE This study aimed to develop and validate a commercially available two-color dark-adapted full field perimetry (2cDAP) protocol to assess rod and cone function in patients with inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs), specifically retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The goal was to establish a widely accessible and reproducible method for measuring rod function for use in evaluating treatment efficacy in clinical trials. METHODS We developed a 2cDAP protocol using the Octopus 900 Pro perimeter to measure thresholds to 450 nm (blue) and 610 nm (red) stimuli under dark-adapted conditions. The spectral sensitivity difference (SSD) between the stimuli was calculated to determine rod and cone mediation. A cohort of 35 RP patients and 14 normally sighted subjects underwent 2cDAP and standard light-adapted perimetry (LAP) across a standardized 78-point grid. Longitudinal data were collected from 12 RP patients over 12 months. RESULTS 2cDAP demonstrated high repeatability in normally sighted subjects and consistent results across institutions. For normally sighted subjects, testing time was approximately 14.1 minutes for the red stimulus, 14.5 minutes for the blue stimulus, and 13.1 minutes for LAP. The testing time for patients with RP was approximately 13.3 minutes for the red stimulus, 13.2 minutes for the blue stimulus, and 12.1 minutes for LAP. The method detected rod-mediated function in retinal regions undetectable by LAP. Longitudinal data showed faster progression rates in rod-mediated loci compared to cone-mediated loci when measured under scotopic with a blue or red stimulus compared to standard white stimuli in mesopic conditions. For dark adapted blue stimuli, the drop in mean sensitivity was from 25.8 dB to 20.4 dB in a year (a -5.4 dB change), compared to the dark adapted red stimulus where mean sensitivity changed from 17.3 dB to 16.9 dB (a -0.4 dB change) and light adapted perimetry with the white stimulus where mean sensitivity changed from 15.6 dB to 14.2 dB (a -1.4 dB change). These findings underscore the utility of 2cDAP in capturing early rod function loss, which is critical for evaluating emerging treatments. CONCLUSIONS Our 2cDAP protocol provides a robust, spatially resolved assessment of photoreceptor function in IRDs. Its ability to differentiate rod and cone contributions, coupled with its accessibility on commercially available equipment, makes it a promising tool for multicenter clinical trials. Future work will focus on refining the protocol, expanding normative databases, and validating the method in larger patient cohorts.
开发和验证一种市售的双色暗适应视野评估遗传性视网膜变性。
目的:本研究旨在开发和验证市售的双色暗适应全视野视野(2cDAP)方案,以评估遗传性视网膜变性(IRDs),特别是色素性视网膜炎(RP)患者的视杆和视锥功能。目的是建立一种可广泛使用和可重复的方法来测量棒的功能,用于评估临床试验中的治疗效果。方法:在暗适应条件下,使用Octopus 900 Pro周长测量450 nm(蓝色)和610 nm(红色)刺激阈值,开发了一种2cDAP方案。计算刺激之间的光谱灵敏度差(SSD)来确定杆状体和锥体的中介作用。35名RP患者和14名视力正常的受试者在标准化的78点网格上进行了2cDAP和标准光适应视野测量(LAP)。在12个月的时间里收集了12名RP患者的纵向数据。结果2cdap在视力正常的受试者中具有高重复性,在不同机构中结果一致。对于视力正常的受试者,红色刺激的测试时间约为14.1分钟,蓝色刺激的测试时间约为14.5分钟,LAP测试时间约为13.1分钟。RP患者的测试时间为红色刺激约13.3分钟,蓝色刺激约13.2分钟,LAP约12.1分钟。该方法检测了LAP无法检测到的视网膜区域的棒介导功能。纵向数据显示,与中观条件下的标准白色刺激相比,在蓝色或红色刺激下测量的杆状介导的基因座的进展速度要快于锥状介导的基因座。对于暗适应蓝色刺激,平均灵敏度在一年内从25.8 dB下降到20.4 dB(变化-5.4 dB),相比之下,暗适应红色刺激的平均灵敏度从17.3 dB变化到16.9 dB(变化-0.4 dB),光适应白色刺激的平均灵敏度从15.6 dB变化到14.2 dB(变化-1.4 dB)。这些发现强调了2cDAP在早期杆状细胞功能丧失中的作用,这对于评估新出现的治疗方法至关重要。结论2dap方案提供了一种可靠的、空间分辨的ird光感受器功能评估方法。它能够区分杆状和锥状的贡献,再加上它在市售设备上的可获得性,使其成为多中心临床试验的有前途的工具。未来的工作将集中在完善方案,扩展规范数据库,并在更大的患者群体中验证该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信