{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of EyeArt for Fundus-Based Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ting-Wei Wang,Wei-Ting Luo,Yu-Kang Tu,Yu-Bai Chou,Yu-Te Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness globally. Although early detection via routine retinal screening significantly reduces vision loss, screening rates remain suboptimal due to workforce shortages and limited accessibility. Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as EyeArt offer an FDA-authorized solution for point-of-care DR screening without ophthalmologist oversight METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA-DTA guidelines to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EyeArt in detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (rDR) from color fundus photographs. Searches of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 2025 identified eligible studies involving adult populations screened with EyeArt. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using bivariate random-effects models. Subgroup and applicability analyses were conducted to evaluate heterogeneity and clinical relevance.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSeventeen studies comprising 162,695 examinations were included. EyeArt demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) and specificity of 81% (95% CI: 74-87%). Subgroup analyses indicated consistent accuracy across study designs, economic settings, healthcare contexts, device types, external validation and image gradability. Specificity varied slightly with vendor involvement.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAcross 17 real-world studies (162,695 examinations), EyeArt exhibits high diagnostic accuracy for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (pooled sensitivity 95%, specificity 81%), with high certainty for sensitivity and moderate certainty for specificity. Its consistently strong sensitivity supports autonomous screening in primary care. However, variability in specificity-along with inconsistent reporting/handling of ungradable images-warrants attention and standardized quality-assurance. Successful deployment will depend on workflow/EHR integration, sustainable reimbursement, and targeted implementation in underserved populations to maximize public-health impact.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness globally. Although early detection via routine retinal screening significantly reduces vision loss, screening rates remain suboptimal due to workforce shortages and limited accessibility. Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as EyeArt offer an FDA-authorized solution for point-of-care DR screening without ophthalmologist oversight METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA-DTA guidelines to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EyeArt in detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (rDR) from color fundus photographs. Searches of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 2025 identified eligible studies involving adult populations screened with EyeArt. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using bivariate random-effects models. Subgroup and applicability analyses were conducted to evaluate heterogeneity and clinical relevance.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies comprising 162,695 examinations were included. EyeArt demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) and specificity of 81% (95% CI: 74-87%). Subgroup analyses indicated consistent accuracy across study designs, economic settings, healthcare contexts, device types, external validation and image gradability. Specificity varied slightly with vendor involvement.
CONCLUSION
Across 17 real-world studies (162,695 examinations), EyeArt exhibits high diagnostic accuracy for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (pooled sensitivity 95%, specificity 81%), with high certainty for sensitivity and moderate certainty for specificity. Its consistently strong sensitivity supports autonomous screening in primary care. However, variability in specificity-along with inconsistent reporting/handling of ungradable images-warrants attention and standardized quality-assurance. Successful deployment will depend on workflow/EHR integration, sustainable reimbursement, and targeted implementation in underserved populations to maximize public-health impact.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.