Diagnostic Accuracy of EyeArt for Fundus-Based Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ting-Wei Wang,Wei-Ting Luo,Yu-Kang Tu,Yu-Bai Chou,Yu-Te Wu
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of EyeArt for Fundus-Based Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ting-Wei Wang,Wei-Ting Luo,Yu-Kang Tu,Yu-Bai Chou,Yu-Te Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness globally. Although early detection via routine retinal screening significantly reduces vision loss, screening rates remain suboptimal due to workforce shortages and limited accessibility. Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as EyeArt offer an FDA-authorized solution for point-of-care DR screening without ophthalmologist oversight METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA-DTA guidelines to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EyeArt in detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (rDR) from color fundus photographs. Searches of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 2025 identified eligible studies involving adult populations screened with EyeArt. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using bivariate random-effects models. Subgroup and applicability analyses were conducted to evaluate heterogeneity and clinical relevance.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSeventeen studies comprising 162,695 examinations were included. EyeArt demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) and specificity of 81% (95% CI: 74-87%). Subgroup analyses indicated consistent accuracy across study designs, economic settings, healthcare contexts, device types, external validation and image gradability. Specificity varied slightly with vendor involvement.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAcross 17 real-world studies (162,695 examinations), EyeArt exhibits high diagnostic accuracy for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (pooled sensitivity 95%, specificity 81%), with high certainty for sensitivity and moderate certainty for specificity. Its consistently strong sensitivity supports autonomous screening in primary care. However, variability in specificity-along with inconsistent reporting/handling of ungradable images-warrants attention and standardized quality-assurance. Successful deployment will depend on workflow/EHR integration, sustainable reimbursement, and targeted implementation in underserved populations to maximize public-health impact.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.09.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness globally. Although early detection via routine retinal screening significantly reduces vision loss, screening rates remain suboptimal due to workforce shortages and limited accessibility. Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as EyeArt offer an FDA-authorized solution for point-of-care DR screening without ophthalmologist oversight METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA-DTA guidelines to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EyeArt in detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (rDR) from color fundus photographs. Searches of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 2025 identified eligible studies involving adult populations screened with EyeArt. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using bivariate random-effects models. Subgroup and applicability analyses were conducted to evaluate heterogeneity and clinical relevance. RESULTS Seventeen studies comprising 162,695 examinations were included. EyeArt demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) and specificity of 81% (95% CI: 74-87%). Subgroup analyses indicated consistent accuracy across study designs, economic settings, healthcare contexts, device types, external validation and image gradability. Specificity varied slightly with vendor involvement. CONCLUSION Across 17 real-world studies (162,695 examinations), EyeArt exhibits high diagnostic accuracy for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (pooled sensitivity 95%, specificity 81%), with high certainty for sensitivity and moderate certainty for specificity. Its consistently strong sensitivity supports autonomous screening in primary care. However, variability in specificity-along with inconsistent reporting/handling of ungradable images-warrants attention and standardized quality-assurance. Successful deployment will depend on workflow/EHR integration, sustainable reimbursement, and targeted implementation in underserved populations to maximize public-health impact.
眼底检测糖尿病视网膜病变的EyeArt诊断准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是全球可预防性失明的主要原因。尽管通过常规视网膜筛查的早期发现可以显著减少视力丧失,但由于劳动力短缺和可及性有限,筛查率仍然不理想。方法:我们根据PRISMA-DTA指南进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估EyeArt从彩色眼底照片中检测可参考糖尿病视网膜病变(rDR)的诊断准确性。截至2025年4月,检索PubMed, Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov,确定了使用EyeArt筛选的成人人群的合格研究。使用双变量随机效应模型对敏感性和特异性进行汇总。进行亚组分析和适用性分析以评估异质性和临床相关性。结果纳入17项研究,共162,695项检查。EyeArt的总灵敏度为95% (95% CI: 92-97%),特异性为81% (95% CI: 74-87%)。亚组分析表明,在研究设计、经济环境、医疗环境、设备类型、外部验证和图像可分级性方面,准确性是一致的。特异性因供应商的参与而略有不同。在17项真实世界的研究(162,695项检查)中,EyeArt在检测可参考的糖尿病视网膜病变方面表现出很高的诊断准确性(总灵敏度95%,特异性81%),敏感性具有高确定性,特异性具有中等确定性。它一贯的高灵敏度支持初级保健的自主筛查。然而,特异性的可变性-以及不一致的报告/处理不可分级的图像-值得注意和标准化的质量保证。成功的部署将取决于工作流程/电子病历的整合、可持续的报销以及在服务不足的人群中有针对性地实施,以最大限度地发挥公共卫生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信