Investigating whether deep learning models for co-folding learn the physics of protein-ligand interactions.

IF 15.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Matthew R Masters,Amr H Mahmoud,Markus A Lill
{"title":"Investigating whether deep learning models for co-folding learn the physics of protein-ligand interactions.","authors":"Matthew R Masters,Amr H Mahmoud,Markus A Lill","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-63947-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-folding models represent a major innovation in deep-learning-based protein-ligand structure prediction. The recent publications of RoseTTAFold All-Atom, AlphaFold3, and others have shown high-quality results on predicting the structures of proteins interacting with small-molecules, nucleic-acids, and other proteins. Despite these advanced capabilities and broad potential, the current study presents critical findings that question the adherence of these models to fundamental physical principles. Through adversarial examples based on established physical, chemical, and biological principles, we demonstrate notable discrepancies in protein-ligand structural predictions when subjected to biologically and chemically plausible perturbations. These discrepancies reveal a significant divergence from expected physical behaviors, indicating potential overfitting to particular data features within its training corpus. Our findings underscore the models' limitations in generalizing effectively across diverse protein-ligand structures and highlight the necessity of integrating robust physical and chemical priors in the development of such predictive tools. The results advocate a measured reliance on deep-learning-based models for critical applications in drug discovery and protein engineering, where a deep understanding of the underlying physical and chemical properties is crucial.","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"30 1","pages":"8854"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63947-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-folding models represent a major innovation in deep-learning-based protein-ligand structure prediction. The recent publications of RoseTTAFold All-Atom, AlphaFold3, and others have shown high-quality results on predicting the structures of proteins interacting with small-molecules, nucleic-acids, and other proteins. Despite these advanced capabilities and broad potential, the current study presents critical findings that question the adherence of these models to fundamental physical principles. Through adversarial examples based on established physical, chemical, and biological principles, we demonstrate notable discrepancies in protein-ligand structural predictions when subjected to biologically and chemically plausible perturbations. These discrepancies reveal a significant divergence from expected physical behaviors, indicating potential overfitting to particular data features within its training corpus. Our findings underscore the models' limitations in generalizing effectively across diverse protein-ligand structures and highlight the necessity of integrating robust physical and chemical priors in the development of such predictive tools. The results advocate a measured reliance on deep-learning-based models for critical applications in drug discovery and protein engineering, where a deep understanding of the underlying physical and chemical properties is crucial.
研究共折叠的深度学习模型是否学习了蛋白质-配体相互作用的物理学。
共折叠模型代表了基于深度学习的蛋白质配体结构预测的重大创新。最近发表的RoseTTAFold All-Atom、AlphaFold3等在预测蛋白质与小分子、核酸和其他蛋白质相互作用的结构方面显示了高质量的结果。尽管有这些先进的能力和广泛的潜力,目前的研究提出了一些关键的发现,质疑这些模型是否符合基本的物理原理。通过基于已建立的物理、化学和生物学原理的对抗性示例,我们证明了当受到生物学和化学上合理的扰动时,蛋白质配体结构预测存在显着差异。这些差异揭示了与预期物理行为的显著差异,表明其训练语料库中特定数据特征的潜在过拟合。我们的发现强调了模型在有效推广不同蛋白质配体结构方面的局限性,并强调了在开发此类预测工具时整合强大的物理和化学先验的必要性。研究结果表明,在药物发现和蛋白质工程的关键应用中,需要对基于深度学习的模型进行适度的依赖,在这些应用中,对潜在物理和化学性质的深入理解至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信