Comparing respiratory illness surveillance case definitions to detect Bordetella pertussis in children aged <5 years with respiratory illness in South Africa, 2017-2023

Kate Bishop, Fahima Moosa, Mvuyo Makhasi, Jackie Kleynhans, Fathima Naby, Mignon du Plessis, Gary Reubenson, Halima Dawood, Heather J Zar, Susan Meiring, Vanessa Quan, Nicole Wolter, Anne von Gottberg, Cheryl Cohen, Alex de Voux, Sibongile Walaza
{"title":"Comparing respiratory illness surveillance case definitions to detect Bordetella pertussis in children aged <5 years with respiratory illness in South Africa, 2017-2023","authors":"Kate Bishop, Fahima Moosa, Mvuyo Makhasi, Jackie Kleynhans, Fathima Naby, Mignon du Plessis, Gary Reubenson, Halima Dawood, Heather J Zar, Susan Meiring, Vanessa Quan, Nicole Wolter, Anne von Gottberg, Cheryl Cohen, Alex de Voux, Sibongile Walaza","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Pertussis is vaccine-preventable and surveillance can guide interventions. Assessing the performance of syndromic surveillance and the World Health Organization (WHO) pertussis case definitions can identify improvements to enhance detection and monitoring of Bordetella pertussis. Methods We analysed respiratory illness sentinel surveillance data among children aged &amp;lt;5 years from January 2017 through December 2023. Participants were enrolled as outpatients with influenza-like illness (ILI), or hospitalised patients with severe respiratory illness (SRI) surveillance. Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for B. pertussis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Sensitivity, specificity, and performance indicators of case definitions were evaluated against PCR results. Results Of 23,642 participants with PCR results, B. pertussis was detected in 0.7% (30/4,125; median age: 6.2 months; interquartile range [IQR]: 2.1–15.8) from ILI and 1.6% (314/19,517; median age: 1.7 months; IQR: 1.2–2.4) from SRI surveillance. Compared to the WHO pertussis case definition, a modified pertussis case definition (including apnoea, omitting cough duration) improved sensitivity (ILI: 30.0% vs. 43.3%; SRI: 55.7% vs. 60.2%), but reduced specificity (ILI: 90.5% vs. 75.8%; SRI: 88.3% vs. 80.9%). Negative predictive values were high for both definitions (&amp;gt;99%), while positive predictive values were low (&amp;lt;15%), reflecting low prevalence. Both WHO- and modified pertussis case definitions missed a large proportion of true pertussis cases (ILI: 70.0% vs. 56.7%; SRI: 44.3% vs. 39.8%). Conclusion Both WHO and modified pertussis case definitions missed many laboratory-confirmed pertussis cases, underestimating disease burden. Revising the WHO pertussis case definition and integrating pertussis into syndromic surveillance could improve detection while leveraging existing resources.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Pertussis is vaccine-preventable and surveillance can guide interventions. Assessing the performance of syndromic surveillance and the World Health Organization (WHO) pertussis case definitions can identify improvements to enhance detection and monitoring of Bordetella pertussis. Methods We analysed respiratory illness sentinel surveillance data among children aged &lt;5 years from January 2017 through December 2023. Participants were enrolled as outpatients with influenza-like illness (ILI), or hospitalised patients with severe respiratory illness (SRI) surveillance. Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for B. pertussis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Sensitivity, specificity, and performance indicators of case definitions were evaluated against PCR results. Results Of 23,642 participants with PCR results, B. pertussis was detected in 0.7% (30/4,125; median age: 6.2 months; interquartile range [IQR]: 2.1–15.8) from ILI and 1.6% (314/19,517; median age: 1.7 months; IQR: 1.2–2.4) from SRI surveillance. Compared to the WHO pertussis case definition, a modified pertussis case definition (including apnoea, omitting cough duration) improved sensitivity (ILI: 30.0% vs. 43.3%; SRI: 55.7% vs. 60.2%), but reduced specificity (ILI: 90.5% vs. 75.8%; SRI: 88.3% vs. 80.9%). Negative predictive values were high for both definitions (&gt;99%), while positive predictive values were low (&lt;15%), reflecting low prevalence. Both WHO- and modified pertussis case definitions missed a large proportion of true pertussis cases (ILI: 70.0% vs. 56.7%; SRI: 44.3% vs. 39.8%). Conclusion Both WHO and modified pertussis case definitions missed many laboratory-confirmed pertussis cases, underestimating disease burden. Revising the WHO pertussis case definition and integrating pertussis into syndromic surveillance could improve detection while leveraging existing resources.
比较南非2017-2023年呼吸道疾病监测病例定义以检测南非5岁以下呼吸道疾病儿童百日咳博德泰拉
背景百日咳是疫苗可预防的,监测可以指导干预措施。评估综合征监测的表现和世界卫生组织(世卫组织)百日咳病例定义可以确定改进措施,以加强百日咳博德泰拉的检测和监测。方法:分析儿童呼吸道疾病哨点监测资料;5年,从2017年1月到2023年12月。参与者被登记为流感样疾病(ILI)的门诊患者,或严重呼吸道疾病(SRI)监测的住院患者。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测鼻咽拭子百日咳。根据PCR结果对病例定义的敏感性、特异性和性能指标进行评估。结果在23,642名有PCR结果的参与者中,ILI监测中检测到百日咳杆菌的比例为0.7%(30/4,125,中位年龄:6.2个月;四分位数间距[IQR]: 2.1-15.8), SRI监测中检测到百日咳杆菌的比例为1.6%(314/19,517,中位年龄:1.7个月;IQR: 1.2-2.4)。与WHO百日咳病例定义相比,修改后的百日咳病例定义(包括呼吸暂停,不包括咳嗽持续时间)提高了敏感性(ILI: 30.0%对43.3%;SRI: 55.7%对60.2%),但降低了特异性(ILI: 90.5%对75.8%;SRI: 88.3%对80.9%)。两种定义的阴性预测值都很高(>99%),而阳性预测值很低(<15%),反映了低患病率。世卫组织和修订的百日咳病例定义都遗漏了很大比例的真正百日咳病例(ILI: 70.0%对56.7%;SRI: 44.3%对39.8%)。结论世界卫生组织和修订的百日咳病例定义都遗漏了许多实验室确认的百日咳病例,低估了疾病负担。修订世卫组织百日咳病例定义并将百日咳纳入综合征监测可在利用现有资源的同时改进检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信