The Role of CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score in Predicting Clinical Complications Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Dwi Ariyanti, Muhammad Farhan Hibatulloh, Cinday Kinanti Pramusinta, Achmad Ilham Tohari, Aqilla Sakanti Chandrarini, Muhammad Yusuf Fadhil, Yudi Her Oktaviono, I Gde Rurus Suryawan, Wynne Widiarti, Novia Nurul Faizah, Firas Farisi Alkaff, Pandit Bagus Tri Saputra
{"title":"The Role of CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score in Predicting Clinical Complications Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dwi Ariyanti, Muhammad Farhan Hibatulloh, Cinday Kinanti Pramusinta, Achmad Ilham Tohari, Aqilla Sakanti Chandrarini, Muhammad Yusuf Fadhil, Yudi Her Oktaviono, I Gde Rurus Suryawan, Wynne Widiarti, Novia Nurul Faizah, Firas Farisi Alkaff, Pandit Bagus Tri Saputra","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was originally developed to assess stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, it has been explored as a potential tool for predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its effectiveness in this context remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to evaluate the ability of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten observational studies involving a total of 14,143 patients were included. The primary outcomes were ISR, AST, and MACE. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most included studies were observational with varying endpoints, follow-up periods, and stent technologies, limiting causal inference, subgroup analyses, and introducing potential bias. The pooled analysis showed that higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were significantly associated with increased risks of ISR (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.75-2.78), AST (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.60), and MACE (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.22-1.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score shows strong predictive value for ISR, AST, and MACE after PCI. Its simplicity and ease of use make it a practical tool for bedside risk assessment in clinical settings. Future prospective, multicenter studies with patient-level data are needed to validate the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in non-AF populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was originally developed to assess stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, it has been explored as a potential tool for predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its effectiveness in this context remains underexplored.
Aims: This review aims to evaluate the ability of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten observational studies involving a total of 14,143 patients were included. The primary outcomes were ISR, AST, and MACE. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models.
Results: Most included studies were observational with varying endpoints, follow-up periods, and stent technologies, limiting causal inference, subgroup analyses, and introducing potential bias. The pooled analysis showed that higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were significantly associated with increased risks of ISR (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.75-2.78), AST (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.60), and MACE (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.22-1.69).
Conclusion: The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score shows strong predictive value for ISR, AST, and MACE after PCI. Its simplicity and ease of use make it a practical tool for bedside risk assessment in clinical settings. Future prospective, multicenter studies with patient-level data are needed to validate the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in non-AF populations.