The Role of CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score in Predicting Clinical Complications Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dwi Ariyanti, Muhammad Farhan Hibatulloh, Cinday Kinanti Pramusinta, Achmad Ilham Tohari, Aqilla Sakanti Chandrarini, Muhammad Yusuf Fadhil, Yudi Her Oktaviono, I Gde Rurus Suryawan, Wynne Widiarti, Novia Nurul Faizah, Firas Farisi Alkaff, Pandit Bagus Tri Saputra
{"title":"The Role of CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score in Predicting Clinical Complications Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dwi Ariyanti, Muhammad Farhan Hibatulloh, Cinday Kinanti Pramusinta, Achmad Ilham Tohari, Aqilla Sakanti Chandrarini, Muhammad Yusuf Fadhil, Yudi Her Oktaviono, I Gde Rurus Suryawan, Wynne Widiarti, Novia Nurul Faizah, Firas Farisi Alkaff, Pandit Bagus Tri Saputra","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was originally developed to assess stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, it has been explored as a potential tool for predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its effectiveness in this context remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to evaluate the ability of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten observational studies involving a total of 14,143 patients were included. The primary outcomes were ISR, AST, and MACE. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most included studies were observational with varying endpoints, follow-up periods, and stent technologies, limiting causal inference, subgroup analyses, and introducing potential bias. The pooled analysis showed that higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were significantly associated with increased risks of ISR (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.75-2.78), AST (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.60), and MACE (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.22-1.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score shows strong predictive value for ISR, AST, and MACE after PCI. Its simplicity and ease of use make it a practical tool for bedside risk assessment in clinical settings. Future prospective, multicenter studies with patient-level data are needed to validate the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in non-AF populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was originally developed to assess stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, it has been explored as a potential tool for predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its effectiveness in this context remains underexplored.

Aims: This review aims to evaluate the ability of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten observational studies involving a total of 14,143 patients were included. The primary outcomes were ISR, AST, and MACE. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models.

Results: Most included studies were observational with varying endpoints, follow-up periods, and stent technologies, limiting causal inference, subgroup analyses, and introducing potential bias. The pooled analysis showed that higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were significantly associated with increased risks of ISR (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.75-2.78), AST (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.60), and MACE (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.22-1.69).

Conclusion: The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score shows strong predictive value for ISR, AST, and MACE after PCI. Its simplicity and ease of use make it a practical tool for bedside risk assessment in clinical settings. Future prospective, multicenter studies with patient-level data are needed to validate the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in non-AF populations.

CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分在预测原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床并发症中的作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分最初用于评估房颤(AF)患者的卒中风险。最近,它已被探索作为预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后不良心血管结局的潜在工具。然而,其在这方面的有效性仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本综述旨在评估CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分预测PCI患者不良心血管结局的能力。方法:按照PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。10项观察性研究共纳入14143例患者。主要结局为ISR、AST和MACE。采用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(ci)的合并优势比(ORs)或风险比(hr)。结果:大多数纳入的研究是观察性的,具有不同的终点、随访期和支架技术,限制了因果推断、亚组分析,并引入了潜在的偏倚。汇总分析显示,较高的CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分与ISR (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.75-2.78)、AST (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.60)和MACE (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.22-1.69)的风险增加显著相关。结论:CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分对PCI术后ISR、AST、MACE有较强的预测价值。它的简单性和易用性使其成为临床环境中床边风险评估的实用工具。未来需要有患者水平数据的前瞻性多中心研究来验证非房颤人群的CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信