Impact of an ASP intervention on the request for post-treatment control urine cultures in primary care.

Iker Alonso-González, Maider Zuriarrain-Alonso, Koldo López-Guridi, Paula Lara-Esbrí, Rita Sainz de Rozas, Itxasne Lekue, José Luis Barrios-Andrés
{"title":"Impact of an ASP intervention on the request for post-treatment control urine cultures in primary care.","authors":"Iker Alonso-González, Maider Zuriarrain-Alonso, Koldo López-Guridi, Paula Lara-Esbrí, Rita Sainz de Rozas, Itxasne Lekue, José Luis Barrios-Andrés","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the aim of reducing the number of Post-Treatment Control Urine Cultures (UC) from Health Centers in our healthcare area, we conducted an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) intervention throughout 2022. To do this, we set out to introduce effective methods to quantify, analyze, and subsequently try to reduce the number of inappropiate UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective and non-restrictive quasi-experimental intervention study with historical and parallel control group to evaluate the impact of the intervention. The UC evaluation was performed by analyzing all the medical records of repeated UC in a period of less than 31 days. UC were classified as: appropriate, inappropriate and doubtful. The study was conducted in 3 phases: phase 1) measurement of the baseline situation; phase 2) intervention in intervention group: simple educational presentations and implementation of a non-restrictive computerized rule, and phase 3) analysis of results in both groups and periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Looking at the %AUC, we observed that in the control group there was hardly any variation while in the intervention group (IG) these increased by 152.4 (p < 0.001). In addition, in the IG there was a decrease in total UCs of 55.4% (n = 418), representing an estimated savings of €7524. The acceptance of the CR in the IG was 9.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This ASP intervention is useful in decreasing the number of IUCs, especially the educational presentations. Achieving this can reduce direct and indirect patient harm and healthcare overload, in addition to improving the management of healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the aim of reducing the number of Post-Treatment Control Urine Cultures (UC) from Health Centers in our healthcare area, we conducted an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) intervention throughout 2022. To do this, we set out to introduce effective methods to quantify, analyze, and subsequently try to reduce the number of inappropiate UC.

Methods: We conducted a prospective and non-restrictive quasi-experimental intervention study with historical and parallel control group to evaluate the impact of the intervention. The UC evaluation was performed by analyzing all the medical records of repeated UC in a period of less than 31 days. UC were classified as: appropriate, inappropriate and doubtful. The study was conducted in 3 phases: phase 1) measurement of the baseline situation; phase 2) intervention in intervention group: simple educational presentations and implementation of a non-restrictive computerized rule, and phase 3) analysis of results in both groups and periods.

Results: Looking at the %AUC, we observed that in the control group there was hardly any variation while in the intervention group (IG) these increased by 152.4 (p < 0.001). In addition, in the IG there was a decrease in total UCs of 55.4% (n = 418), representing an estimated savings of €7524. The acceptance of the CR in the IG was 9.6%.

Conclusions: This ASP intervention is useful in decreasing the number of IUCs, especially the educational presentations. Achieving this can reduce direct and indirect patient harm and healthcare overload, in addition to improving the management of healthcare resources.

ASP干预对初级保健治疗后控制尿培养要求的影响。
前言:为了减少我们医疗保健区域卫生中心治疗后控制尿液培养(UC)的数量,我们在2022年进行了一项抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)干预。为了做到这一点,我们开始引入有效的方法来量化、分析,并随后尝试减少不适当的UC的数量。方法:采用前瞻性、非限制性准实验干预研究,采用历史对照组和平行对照组,评价干预效果。通过分析所有在31天以内重复UC的医疗记录进行UC评估。UC分为:适当、不适当和可疑。研究分三个阶段进行:第一阶段测量基线情况;第二阶段对干预组进行干预:简单的教育演示和非限制性计算机规则的实施,第三阶段对两组和两期的结果进行分析。结果:观察%AUC,我们发现在对照组几乎没有变化,而在干预组(IG),这些变化增加了152.4 (p)。结论:ASP干预有助于减少IUCs的数量,特别是教育演示。实现这一目标除了可以改善医疗资源管理外,还可以减少对患者的直接和间接伤害以及医疗保健超载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信