Effect of artificial sweat, pigmentation and adhesives for fixing facial prostheses on physical and optical properties of two facial silicones.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v12.44660
Gabriele Martins, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos, Bárbara Luise Medeiros Dos Santos, Fernanda Pereira de Caxias, Marcelo Coelho Goiato
{"title":"Effect of artificial sweat, pigmentation and adhesives for fixing facial prostheses on physical and optical properties of two facial silicones.","authors":"Gabriele Martins, Daniela Micheline Dos Santos, Bárbara Luise Medeiros Dos Santos, Fernanda Pereira de Caxias, Marcelo Coelho Goiato","doi":"10.2340/biid.v12.44660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sweat and adhesives on color stability, roughness (Ra) and Shore A hardness of two silicones for facial prostheses with different pigmentation. Samples of Silastic MDX4-4210 and A-2186 silicone were made for the proposed tests, distributed into 12 groups according to their pigmentation and adhesive used and were immersed in artificial sweat for 3 months, disinfected every 3 days with neutral soap. Measurements of color stability, roughness and hardness were performed according to ISO 21920 and CIEDE2000 using a spectrophotometer and ISO 868, respectively. There was a statistically significant color change in the two silicones used, with the groups that had the least change being those without adhesive applied to their surface (controls). There was also a reduction in roughness in all groups, with MDX4-4210 being the roughest silicone. In terms of Shore A hardness, all the groups became harder after the experimental period, with A-2186 achieving the highest results. Color change, Shore A hardness and roughness showed significant changes in the MDX4-4210 and A-2186 silicones for the proposed tests. Even so, all the results found were clinically acceptable, making both silicones excellent options for use in maxillofacial rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"12 ","pages":"44660"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.44660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sweat and adhesives on color stability, roughness (Ra) and Shore A hardness of two silicones for facial prostheses with different pigmentation. Samples of Silastic MDX4-4210 and A-2186 silicone were made for the proposed tests, distributed into 12 groups according to their pigmentation and adhesive used and were immersed in artificial sweat for 3 months, disinfected every 3 days with neutral soap. Measurements of color stability, roughness and hardness were performed according to ISO 21920 and CIEDE2000 using a spectrophotometer and ISO 868, respectively. There was a statistically significant color change in the two silicones used, with the groups that had the least change being those without adhesive applied to their surface (controls). There was also a reduction in roughness in all groups, with MDX4-4210 being the roughest silicone. In terms of Shore A hardness, all the groups became harder after the experimental period, with A-2186 achieving the highest results. Color change, Shore A hardness and roughness showed significant changes in the MDX4-4210 and A-2186 silicones for the proposed tests. Even so, all the results found were clinically acceptable, making both silicones excellent options for use in maxillofacial rehabilitation.

人工汗液、色素沉着和黏合剂对两种面硅树脂物理光学性能的影响。
本研究的目的是评估汗液和黏合剂对两种不同色素沉着的面部假体的颜色稳定性、粗糙度(Ra)和Shore A硬度的影响。拟进行试验的硅橡胶MDX4-4210和A-2186硅胶样品,根据其色素沉着和使用的粘合剂分为12组,浸泡在人工汗液中3个月,每3天用中性肥皂消毒一次。颜色稳定性、粗糙度和硬度的测量分别按照ISO 21920和CIEDE2000使用分光光度计和ISO 868进行。在使用的两种有机硅中,有统计学上显著的颜色变化,其中变化最小的组是那些没有在其表面涂粘合剂的组(对照组)。所有组的粗糙度也有所降低,MDX4-4210是最粗糙的硅胶。肖尔A硬度方面,各组在实验结束后硬度均有所提高,其中A-2186硬度最高。MDX4-4210和A-2186有机硅的颜色变化、邵氏硬度和粗糙度均有显著变化。尽管如此,所有发现的结果都是临床可接受的,使这两种硅树脂成为颌面康复的绝佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信