Photon-counting detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary stents and in-stent restenosis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Doosup Shin, Rick H J A Volleberg, Roosha Parikh, Christopher Chieh Yang Koo, Sarah Malik, Matthew Cannata, Emma Caron, Yasemin Ciftcikal, Koshiro Sakai, J Jane Cao, Lu Chen, Fernando Sosa, Jonathan Weber, Jaffar M Khan, David J Cohen, Jeffrey W Moses, Niels van Royen, Carlos Collet, Richard A Shlofmitz, Evan Shlofmitz, Allen Jeremias, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali
{"title":"Photon-counting detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary stents and in-stent restenosis.","authors":"Doosup Shin, Rick H J A Volleberg, Roosha Parikh, Christopher Chieh Yang Koo, Sarah Malik, Matthew Cannata, Emma Caron, Yasemin Ciftcikal, Koshiro Sakai, J Jane Cao, Lu Chen, Fernando Sosa, Jonathan Weber, Jaffar M Khan, David J Cohen, Jeffrey W Moses, Niels van Royen, Carlos Collet, Richard A Shlofmitz, Evan Shlofmitz, Allen Jeremias, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced spatial resolution and reduced blooming artefacts, potentially improving the evaluation of stented coronary vessels.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of dual-source PCD-CT in detecting obstructive in-stent restenosis (ISR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified consecutive patients with prior coronary stent implantation who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with PCD-CT and subsequent invasive coronary angiography within 90 days between 2023 and 2024. Obstructive ISR (≥50% diameter stenosis) was determined by visual assessment of CCTA and invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in a blinded fashion. The diagnostic performance of CCTA for ISR was compared with that of QCA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 283 stented lesions from 171 patients were included. Of these, only 3 lesions (1.1%) were deemed indeterminate by PCD-CT. Using invasive QCA as the reference standard, PCD-CT demonstrated a lesion-level sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity of 90.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 58.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.4%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 88.9% for detecting obstructive ISR. In a subgroup analysis according to the stent diameter (<3.00 mm [n=83] vs ≥3.00 mm [n=108]), there were no significant differences in sensitivity (87.5% vs 86.7%; p=1.00), specificity (93.3% vs 92.5%; p=1.00), PPV (58.3% vs 65.0%; p=1.00), NPV (98.6% vs 97.7%; p=1.00), or overall diagnostic accuracy (92.8% vs 91.7%; p=1.00), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCD-CT demonstrated good diagnostic performance for evaluating obstructive ISR using QCA as the reference standard, regardless of stent diameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"21 19","pages":"e1137-e1146"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced spatial resolution and reduced blooming artefacts, potentially improving the evaluation of stented coronary vessels.

Aims: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of dual-source PCD-CT in detecting obstructive in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Methods: We identified consecutive patients with prior coronary stent implantation who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with PCD-CT and subsequent invasive coronary angiography within 90 days between 2023 and 2024. Obstructive ISR (≥50% diameter stenosis) was determined by visual assessment of CCTA and invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in a blinded fashion. The diagnostic performance of CCTA for ISR was compared with that of QCA.

Results: A total of 283 stented lesions from 171 patients were included. Of these, only 3 lesions (1.1%) were deemed indeterminate by PCD-CT. Using invasive QCA as the reference standard, PCD-CT demonstrated a lesion-level sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity of 90.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 58.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.4%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 88.9% for detecting obstructive ISR. In a subgroup analysis according to the stent diameter (<3.00 mm [n=83] vs ≥3.00 mm [n=108]), there were no significant differences in sensitivity (87.5% vs 86.7%; p=1.00), specificity (93.3% vs 92.5%; p=1.00), PPV (58.3% vs 65.0%; p=1.00), NPV (98.6% vs 97.7%; p=1.00), or overall diagnostic accuracy (92.8% vs 91.7%; p=1.00), respectively.

Conclusions: PCD-CT demonstrated good diagnostic performance for evaluating obstructive ISR using QCA as the reference standard, regardless of stent diameter.

光子计数检测器计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架和支架内再狭窄。
背景:光子计数检测器计算机断层扫描(PCD-CT)提供了增强的空间分辨率和减少盛开伪影,潜在地改善了冠状动脉支架血管的评估。目的:本研究旨在评价双源PCD-CT对梗阻性支架内再狭窄(ISR)的诊断价值。方法:在2023年至2024年期间的90天内,我们筛选了连续接受冠状动脉支架植入的患者,这些患者接受了临床指示的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)和PCD-CT,并随后进行了有创冠状动脉造影。梗阻性ISR(直径狭窄≥50%)通过CCTA视觉评估和有创定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)盲法确定。比较CCTA与QCA对ISR的诊断效果。结果:171例患者共283个支架病变。其中,只有3个病变(1.1%)被PCD-CT认为不确定。以有创QCA为参考标准,PCD-CT对梗阻性ISR的诊断敏感性为80.0%,特异性为90.4%,阳性预测值(PPV)为58.2%,阴性预测值(NPV)为96.4%,总体诊断准确率为88.9%。结论:无论支架直径如何,以QCA为参考标准,PCD-CT对梗阻性ISR的诊断均具有良好的诊断效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信