Evaluation of a Digital Tool to Collect COVID-19 Surveillance Data.

IF 1.1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Global Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jgid.jgid_154_24
Martijn J S R van der Meulen, Lara M de Graaf, Jeannine L A Hautvast
{"title":"Evaluation of a Digital Tool to Collect COVID-19 Surveillance Data.","authors":"Martijn J S R van der Meulen, Lara M de Graaf, Jeannine L A Hautvast","doi":"10.4103/jgid.jgid_154_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The timely collection and dissemination of public health surveillance data is crucial in infectious disease outbreak control. Traditional methods of collecting surveillance data through telephone interviews aimed at source and contact tracing can be vulnerable during an epidemic with rapidly increasing cases. To address this, we introduced a digital questionnaire that allowed for the timely retrieval of essential surveillance data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluates the response rate and timeliness of the collection of surveillance data from COVID-19-positive individuals using this method and compares the demographic characteristics of responders and non-responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 3240 individuals who tested positive on the COVID-19 laboratory test and were sent a digital questionnaire. Results show that a majority responded the same day (>80%), making it noninferior to conventional (telephonic) COVID-19 surveillance data collection in terms of speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our collection method yields responses from all genders, ages, and socioeconomic groups, including individuals with and without a history of COVID-19, and those tested by both the Public Health Service and third-party test sites. This allows personnel to focus on other priorities such as delivering health education and outbreak management. However, this method has limitations: it is ineffective for individuals without an email address, those facing language barriers, and cases where employers provided their own email addresses instead of the individual's email address. Future research into the quality of the answers provided in a digital questionnaire and its use in surveillance data collection for other infectious diseases is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":51581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases","volume":"17 3","pages":"139-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_154_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The timely collection and dissemination of public health surveillance data is crucial in infectious disease outbreak control. Traditional methods of collecting surveillance data through telephone interviews aimed at source and contact tracing can be vulnerable during an epidemic with rapidly increasing cases. To address this, we introduced a digital questionnaire that allowed for the timely retrieval of essential surveillance data.

Methods: This study evaluates the response rate and timeliness of the collection of surveillance data from COVID-19-positive individuals using this method and compares the demographic characteristics of responders and non-responders.

Results: The study involved 3240 individuals who tested positive on the COVID-19 laboratory test and were sent a digital questionnaire. Results show that a majority responded the same day (>80%), making it noninferior to conventional (telephonic) COVID-19 surveillance data collection in terms of speed.

Conclusion: Our collection method yields responses from all genders, ages, and socioeconomic groups, including individuals with and without a history of COVID-19, and those tested by both the Public Health Service and third-party test sites. This allows personnel to focus on other priorities such as delivering health education and outbreak management. However, this method has limitations: it is ineffective for individuals without an email address, those facing language barriers, and cases where employers provided their own email addresses instead of the individual's email address. Future research into the quality of the answers provided in a digital questionnaire and its use in surveillance data collection for other infectious diseases is necessary.

评估收集COVID-19监测数据的数字工具。
及时收集和传播公共卫生监测数据对传染病疫情控制至关重要。在病例迅速增加的流行病期间,通过电话访谈收集监测数据以追踪来源和接触者的传统方法可能很脆弱。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了一份数字问卷,以便及时检索基本的监测数据。方法:本研究评估使用该方法采集covid -19阳性个体监测数据的响应率和及时性,并比较反应者和无反应者的人口学特征。结果:该研究涉及3240名COVID-19实验室检测呈阳性的人,并向他们发送了一份数字问卷。结果显示,大多数人在当天回复(bbbb80 %),在速度方面不逊于传统的(电话)COVID-19监测数据收集。结论:我们的收集方法得到了所有性别、年龄和社会经济群体的反馈,包括有和没有COVID-19病史的个体,以及通过公共卫生服务和第三方检测站点检测的个体。这使工作人员能够专注于其他优先事项,如提供卫生教育和疫情管理。然而,这种方法也有局限性:对于没有电子邮件地址的人,有语言障碍的人,以及雇主提供他们自己的电子邮件地址而不是个人的电子邮件地址的情况下,它是无效的。未来有必要对数字问卷所提供答案的质量及其在其他传染病监测数据收集中的应用进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: JGID encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Infectious Diseases across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in Infectious Diseases to promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信