Yifan Wang, Zhonglin Wen, Kit-Tai Hau, Tonglin Jin
{"title":"Standardized Estimates of Second-Order Latent Growth Models: A Comparison of Alternative Latent-Standardization Methods.","authors":"Yifan Wang, Zhonglin Wen, Kit-Tai Hau, Tonglin Jin","doi":"10.1080/00273171.2025.2543240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Second-order latent growth models (LGMs) have garnered considerable attention and are increasingly utilized in longitudinal data analyses of latent constructs comprised of multiple items. The growth parameter estimates in these models are intrinsically linked to the model identification methods. Latent-standardization (identification) methods, in which the latent variable is standardized at a reference time point (e.g., eta-1), yield theoretically unique and interpretable growth parameters. Traditional latent-standardization methods indirectly standardize eta-1 <i>via</i> the first-order component of the second-order LGM by constraining item intercepts and/or loadings. Such methods require a two-step modeling procedure and do not truly standardize eta-1. This article proposes a 1-stage method that indirectly standardizes eta-1 through the second-order component of the model by constraining the mean and variance of the level factor. This new single-step modeling method ensures eta-1 is truly standardized, with a mean of 0 and a variance of 1. Theoretical, simulated, and empirical comparisons are conducted across different latent-standardization methods, demonstrating the target accuracy and implementation simplicity of the proposed 1-stage method.</p>","PeriodicalId":53155,"journal":{"name":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multivariate Behavioral Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2025.2543240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Second-order latent growth models (LGMs) have garnered considerable attention and are increasingly utilized in longitudinal data analyses of latent constructs comprised of multiple items. The growth parameter estimates in these models are intrinsically linked to the model identification methods. Latent-standardization (identification) methods, in which the latent variable is standardized at a reference time point (e.g., eta-1), yield theoretically unique and interpretable growth parameters. Traditional latent-standardization methods indirectly standardize eta-1 via the first-order component of the second-order LGM by constraining item intercepts and/or loadings. Such methods require a two-step modeling procedure and do not truly standardize eta-1. This article proposes a 1-stage method that indirectly standardizes eta-1 through the second-order component of the model by constraining the mean and variance of the level factor. This new single-step modeling method ensures eta-1 is truly standardized, with a mean of 0 and a variance of 1. Theoretical, simulated, and empirical comparisons are conducted across different latent-standardization methods, demonstrating the target accuracy and implementation simplicity of the proposed 1-stage method.
期刊介绍:
Multivariate Behavioral Research (MBR) publishes a variety of substantive, methodological, and theoretical articles in all areas of the social and behavioral sciences. Most MBR articles fall into one of two categories. Substantive articles report on applications of sophisticated multivariate research methods to study topics of substantive interest in personality, health, intelligence, industrial/organizational, and other behavioral science areas. Methodological articles present and/or evaluate new developments in multivariate methods, or address methodological issues in current research. We also encourage submission of integrative articles related to pedagogy involving multivariate research methods, and to historical treatments of interest and relevance to multivariate research methods.