Hao Li, Wenchao Xu, Tao Wang, Jihong Liu, Meiliyang Wu
{"title":"Therapeutic Effect of Micro-Energy Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Hao Li, Wenchao Xu, Tao Wang, Jihong Liu, Meiliyang Wu","doi":"10.5534/wjmh.250151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As an emerging therapeutic option for erectile dysfunction (ED), micro-energy treatment (MET) including low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, and electromagnetic fields, has attracted increasing attention. We summarized the current literature to assess the therapeutic effect and find optimal treatment scheme of MET for ED.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to April 2025 was performed. Studies reporting on ED treated with various METs were included. The International Index of Erectile Function and the Erection Hardness Score were used to evaluate the therapeutic effect. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the influence of energy type, treatment course, treatment frequency, patients' characteristics, combination therapy, and setup parameters on efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 randomized controlled trials with 1,986 patients were enrolled. MET group demonstrated better erectile function than control at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed among different energy types, treatment courses, or setup parameters. Patients' comorbidities and responsiveness to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors did not influence efficacy. Treatment twice weekly was superior to once (p<0.05). Vasculogenic ED responded better than neurogenic ED (p<0.05). Combination with other basic therapies enhanced efficacy of MET (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MET was effective for various types of ED, especially vasculogenic ones, with efficacy lasting up to 1 year and no discrepancy among different energy forms. Twice-weekly treatment with course no more than 4 weeks was an appropriate therapeutic protocol. Moreover, combining MET with other therapies could produce synergistic effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":54261,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Mens Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.250151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: As an emerging therapeutic option for erectile dysfunction (ED), micro-energy treatment (MET) including low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, and electromagnetic fields, has attracted increasing attention. We summarized the current literature to assess the therapeutic effect and find optimal treatment scheme of MET for ED.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to April 2025 was performed. Studies reporting on ED treated with various METs were included. The International Index of Erectile Function and the Erection Hardness Score were used to evaluate the therapeutic effect. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the influence of energy type, treatment course, treatment frequency, patients' characteristics, combination therapy, and setup parameters on efficacy.
Results: A total of 32 randomized controlled trials with 1,986 patients were enrolled. MET group demonstrated better erectile function than control at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed among different energy types, treatment courses, or setup parameters. Patients' comorbidities and responsiveness to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors did not influence efficacy. Treatment twice weekly was superior to once (p<0.05). Vasculogenic ED responded better than neurogenic ED (p<0.05). Combination with other basic therapies enhanced efficacy of MET (p<0.05).
Conclusions: MET was effective for various types of ED, especially vasculogenic ones, with efficacy lasting up to 1 year and no discrepancy among different energy forms. Twice-weekly treatment with course no more than 4 weeks was an appropriate therapeutic protocol. Moreover, combining MET with other therapies could produce synergistic effect.
目的:微能量治疗(MET)作为一种新兴的治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的方法,包括低强度体外冲击波治疗、低强度脉冲超声和电磁场治疗,越来越受到人们的关注。我们总结了目前的文献,以评估MET对ed的治疗效果,并找到最佳的治疗方案。材料和方法:综合检索PubMed, Web of Science和Embase到2025年4月。纳入了用各种METs治疗ED的研究报告。采用国际勃起功能指数和勃起硬度评分评价治疗效果。采用亚组分析,探讨能量类型、疗程、治疗频次、患者特点、联合治疗及设置参数对疗效的影响。结果:共纳入32项随机对照试验,共纳入1986例患者。在治疗后1、3、6和12个月,MET组的勃起功能优于对照组(p结论:MET对各种类型的ED,特别是血管源性ED有效,疗效持续长达1年,不同能量形式之间无差异。每周两次治疗,疗程不超过4周是一种合适的治疗方案。此外,MET与其他疗法联合可产生协同效应。