Yannick L Gilanyi, Michael C Ferraro, Andreas Goebel, Neil E O'Connell, Matthew D Jones, Saurab Sharma, Debbie Bean, Sylvia M Gustin, James H McAuley
{"title":"Amputation for complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review.","authors":"Yannick L Gilanyi, Michael C Ferraro, Andreas Goebel, Neil E O'Connell, Matthew D Jones, Saurab Sharma, Debbie Bean, Sylvia M Gustin, James H McAuley","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling pain condition, usually confined to a single limb. Amputation of the affected limb is sometimes performed to improve pain and function for treatment-resistant CRPS. This systematic review evaluated the benefits and harms of amputation for CRPS. Primary studies of adults with CRPS that investigated the effects of amputation of a CRPS affected limb were included. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and adverse events. The following databases were searched from inception to 23 September 2024: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for published literature, and BASE, Web of Science, OpenMD and MedNar for grey literature. Study methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data were synthesised using systematic review without meta-analysis guidance. The review included 66 studies, comprising one comparative study, 23 case series and 42 case studies. Studies included 249 patients who received 263 amputations. Amputation indications included pain relief, functional improvement, infection, fracture, and prosthetic complications. The heterogeneous designs of included studies precluded quantitative estimation of treatment effects. The only included comparative study reported that CRPS patients had lower mean pain intensity scores post-amputation than non-amputated, non-matched control patients. The four studies that assessed pain intensity scores before amputation and at least 6 months post-operatively, reported reductions in average pain post-amputation. Adverse events in assessed patients included phantom pain (67%), residual limb pain (66%), and recurrence of CRPS (47%). The critically low quality of included evidence and incomplete reporting greatly reduced confidence in the results. This review found no clear evidence that amputation of a CRPS-affected limb offers greater pain relief than no amputation. High-quality, controlled prospective studies with embedded qualitative research are needed to determine the benefits and harms of amputation for CRPS, as well as the factors that drive patients to seek this permanent intervention that does not guarantee improvement. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a systematic review of the benefits and harms of amputation for complex regional pain syndrome. The unclear benefits and likely harms can help inform individuals and clinicians considering amputation of the potential outcomes of this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"105571"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling pain condition, usually confined to a single limb. Amputation of the affected limb is sometimes performed to improve pain and function for treatment-resistant CRPS. This systematic review evaluated the benefits and harms of amputation for CRPS. Primary studies of adults with CRPS that investigated the effects of amputation of a CRPS affected limb were included. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and adverse events. The following databases were searched from inception to 23 September 2024: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for published literature, and BASE, Web of Science, OpenMD and MedNar for grey literature. Study methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Data were synthesised using systematic review without meta-analysis guidance. The review included 66 studies, comprising one comparative study, 23 case series and 42 case studies. Studies included 249 patients who received 263 amputations. Amputation indications included pain relief, functional improvement, infection, fracture, and prosthetic complications. The heterogeneous designs of included studies precluded quantitative estimation of treatment effects. The only included comparative study reported that CRPS patients had lower mean pain intensity scores post-amputation than non-amputated, non-matched control patients. The four studies that assessed pain intensity scores before amputation and at least 6 months post-operatively, reported reductions in average pain post-amputation. Adverse events in assessed patients included phantom pain (67%), residual limb pain (66%), and recurrence of CRPS (47%). The critically low quality of included evidence and incomplete reporting greatly reduced confidence in the results. This review found no clear evidence that amputation of a CRPS-affected limb offers greater pain relief than no amputation. High-quality, controlled prospective studies with embedded qualitative research are needed to determine the benefits and harms of amputation for CRPS, as well as the factors that drive patients to seek this permanent intervention that does not guarantee improvement. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a systematic review of the benefits and harms of amputation for complex regional pain syndrome. The unclear benefits and likely harms can help inform individuals and clinicians considering amputation of the potential outcomes of this intervention.
复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是一种致残性疼痛,通常局限于单肢。对于难治性CRPS,有时需要截肢以改善疼痛和功能。本系统综述评估了截肢治疗CRPS的益处和危害。对成人CRPS患者的初步研究调查了CRPS患肢截肢的影响。主要结局是疼痛强度和不良事件。从成立到2024年9月23日,检索了以下数据库:PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、CENTRAL、CINAHL和PsycINFO检索已发表文献,BASE、Web of Science、OpenMD和MedNar检索灰色文献。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的关键评估工具评估研究方法学的质量。数据采用系统评价合成,没有meta分析指导。本综述包括66项研究,包括一项比较研究、23个病例系列和42个案例研究。研究包括249名接受263次截肢的患者。截肢指征包括疼痛缓解、功能改善、感染、骨折和假体并发症。纳入研究的异质性设计排除了对治疗效果的定量估计。唯一纳入的比较研究报告称,CRPS患者截肢后的平均疼痛强度评分低于未截肢、未匹配的对照组患者。这四项研究评估了截肢前和术后至少6个月的疼痛强度评分,报告了截肢后平均疼痛的减少。评估患者的不良事件包括幻肢痛(67%)、残肢痛(66%)和CRPS复发(47%)。纳入证据的极低质量和不完整的报告大大降低了对结果的信心。本综述没有发现明确的证据表明,截肢crps影响的肢体比不截肢更能缓解疼痛。需要高质量的前瞻性对照研究,并进行定性研究,以确定截肢对CRPS的利弊,以及促使患者寻求这种不能保证改善的永久性干预的因素。观点:这篇文章提出了一个系统综述的好处和危害截肢复杂的区域疼痛综合征。不清楚的益处和可能的危害可以帮助告知考虑截肢的个人和临床医生这种干预的潜在结果。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.