What Impacts Endure: A Technologist's Notes on GPT's Impact on Expert Work.

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Qian Yang
{"title":"What Impacts Endure: A Technologist's Notes on GPT's Impact on Expert Work.","authors":"Qian Yang","doi":"10.1037/mac0000210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imundo et al. (2024) argue that (1) ChatGPT and other chatbots powered by generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) models can enhance experts' cognition and training, and (2) these benefits are not equally distributed across all users. This commentary commends both arguments. I provide empirical evidence from the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) to show that both statements hold true, not only with ChatGPT, but also with older computational technologies that mimic the behavioral expressions of expertise. By reinforcing Imundo et al. 's arguments, I also argue that now is an opportune time to pursue an even deeper understanding of the relation between ChatGPT and expertise. For instance, how might systems like ChatGPT influence or redefine what it means to be an expert? Rather than distinguishing cognitive, social, and physical expertise, could alternative taxonomies like generative versus evaluative abilities offer more insightful ways to study genAI's cognitive impact?</p>","PeriodicalId":47622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","volume":"13 4","pages":"505-508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000210","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imundo et al. (2024) argue that (1) ChatGPT and other chatbots powered by generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) models can enhance experts' cognition and training, and (2) these benefits are not equally distributed across all users. This commentary commends both arguments. I provide empirical evidence from the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) to show that both statements hold true, not only with ChatGPT, but also with older computational technologies that mimic the behavioral expressions of expertise. By reinforcing Imundo et al. 's arguments, I also argue that now is an opportune time to pursue an even deeper understanding of the relation between ChatGPT and expertise. For instance, how might systems like ChatGPT influence or redefine what it means to be an expert? Rather than distinguishing cognitive, social, and physical expertise, could alternative taxonomies like generative versus evaluative abilities offer more insightful ways to study genAI's cognitive impact?

什么影响持久:技术专家关于GPT对专家工作影响的笔记。
Imundo等人(2024)认为:(1)ChatGPT和其他由生成式人工智能(genAI)模型驱动的聊天机器人可以增强专家的认知和训练,(2)这些好处并不是均匀分布在所有用户中。这篇评论对这两种观点都予以赞扬。我提供了来自人机交互(HCI)领域的经验证据,以表明这两种说法都是正确的,不仅适用于ChatGPT,而且适用于模仿专家行为表达的旧计算技术。通过强化Imundo等人。我还认为,现在正是深入了解ChatGPT和专业知识之间关系的好时机。例如,像ChatGPT这样的系统如何影响或重新定义专家的含义?而不是区分认知、社交和身体方面的专业知识,像生成能力和评估能力这样的替代分类法是否能为研究基因人工智能的认知影响提供更有见地的方法?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信