The Feasibility of Ecological Momentary Assessment for Assessing Intimate Partner Violence in College Students with a History of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration.

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Psychology of Violence Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1037/vio0000565
Lauren R Grocott, Meagan J Brem, Leslie A Brick, Michael F Armey, Gregory L Stuart, Ryan C Shorey
{"title":"The Feasibility of Ecological Momentary Assessment for Assessing Intimate Partner Violence in College Students with a History of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration.","authors":"Lauren R Grocott, Meagan J Brem, Leslie A Brick, Michael F Armey, Gregory L Stuart, Ryan C Shorey","doi":"10.1037/vio0000565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health problem among college students. However, few studies have used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine IPV, and instead have relied on methods that introduce recall bias (e.g., cross-sectional methods, daily diary). Thus, this study examined the feasibility of EMA to assess IPV among college students aged 18-25.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A sample of 164 college students (18-25 years old, 62.8% women) in a dating relationship with a recent history of IPV perpetration completed one morning and four randomly prompted surveys daily for 28 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings demonstrated high compliance (89.57% for morning and 73.49% for random surveys) with EMA surveys. The prevalence of psychological, physical, and sexual IPV reported on randomly prompted surveys was higher relative to morning surveys. The number of reported IPV instances was higher during the first half of sampling (i.e., first 14 days) compared to the last half of sampling (i.e., days 15-28). Finally, participants reported an overall neutral reaction to EMA methods, despite some technological challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EMA is a feasible method for assessing events of IPV in college students. The reduction of recall bias afforded with EMA methods could bring more accurate examination of prevalence and proximal risk factors for IPV. Intervention approaches could benefit from harnessing EMA methods to bring interventions to the moment they are needed among those who experience IPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":47876,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Violence","volume":"15 4","pages":"395-405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health problem among college students. However, few studies have used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine IPV, and instead have relied on methods that introduce recall bias (e.g., cross-sectional methods, daily diary). Thus, this study examined the feasibility of EMA to assess IPV among college students aged 18-25.

Method: A sample of 164 college students (18-25 years old, 62.8% women) in a dating relationship with a recent history of IPV perpetration completed one morning and four randomly prompted surveys daily for 28 days.

Results: Findings demonstrated high compliance (89.57% for morning and 73.49% for random surveys) with EMA surveys. The prevalence of psychological, physical, and sexual IPV reported on randomly prompted surveys was higher relative to morning surveys. The number of reported IPV instances was higher during the first half of sampling (i.e., first 14 days) compared to the last half of sampling (i.e., days 15-28). Finally, participants reported an overall neutral reaction to EMA methods, despite some technological challenges.

Conclusions: EMA is a feasible method for assessing events of IPV in college students. The reduction of recall bias afforded with EMA methods could bring more accurate examination of prevalence and proximal risk factors for IPV. Intervention approaches could benefit from harnessing EMA methods to bring interventions to the moment they are needed among those who experience IPV.

有亲密伴侣暴力行为史大学生亲密伴侣暴力行为生态瞬间评价的可行性
目的:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是大学生面临的一个公共卫生问题。然而,很少有研究使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)来检查IPV,而是依赖于引入回忆偏差的方法(例如,横断面方法,每日日记)。因此,本研究旨在检验EMA评估18-25岁大学生IPV的可行性。方法:选取164名近期有IPV犯罪史的恋爱大学生(18-25岁,女性占62.8%),在28天内每天完成1个早晨和4个随机提示的调查。结果:调查结果显示EMA调查的高依从性(上午调查89.57%,随机调查73.49%)。在随机提示的调查中报告的心理、身体和性IPV的患病率相对于早上的调查更高。与抽样的后半期(即15-28天)相比,报告的IPV实例数量在抽样的前半期(即前14天)较高。最后,尽管存在一些技术挑战,参与者报告了对EMA方法的总体中性反应。结论:EMA是评估大学生IPV事件的可行方法。EMA方法减少了回忆偏倚,可以更准确地检查IPV的患病率和近端危险因素。干预方法可以受益于利用EMA方法,在经历IPV的人需要干预的时候采取干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信