Listened to but Rarely Heard: A Scoping Review of Resident Engagement in the Organizational Design and Governance of their Long-Term Care Homes.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Molly Hutchinson, Jim Gilhuly, Gale Ramsden, Chloe Lee, Dee Tripp, Beryl Collingwood, Julia Fineczko, Carrie McAiney, Katherine S McGilton, Melissa McVie, Jennifer Bethell
{"title":"Listened to but Rarely Heard: A Scoping Review of Resident Engagement in the Organizational Design and Governance of their Long-Term Care Homes.","authors":"Molly Hutchinson, Jim Gilhuly, Gale Ramsden, Chloe Lee, Dee Tripp, Beryl Collingwood, Julia Fineczko, Carrie McAiney, Katherine S McGilton, Melissa McVie, Jennifer Bethell","doi":"10.1017/S0714980825100263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engaging residents of long-term care homes (LTCHs) in their home's environment, programs, and operations is required in some jurisdictions and could improve resident quality of life and other outcomes. This scoping review summarized existing research on resident engagement in LTCH organizational design and governance, including associated enablers, barriers, approaches, and outcomes. The database search yielded 5,580 records (after deduplication), and 62 articles covering 59 studies were included. These studies predominantly described Residents' Councils (<i>n</i> = 38; 64%) and enablers or barriers pertaining to resident and home perspectives, as well as implementation and sustainability infrastructure. Few studies described approaches to considerations of resident diversity (<i>n</i> = 8; 14%) or the presence of dementia and/or cognitive impairment (<i>n</i> = 12; 20%). Ten studies reported quantitative data evaluating resident engagement, and only four with resident-reported outcomes. Robust, evidence-informed frameworks that are co-designed with residents, staff, and others in the LTCH sector are needed to engage residents in their LTCHs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47613,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal on Aging-Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal on Aging-Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980825100263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engaging residents of long-term care homes (LTCHs) in their home's environment, programs, and operations is required in some jurisdictions and could improve resident quality of life and other outcomes. This scoping review summarized existing research on resident engagement in LTCH organizational design and governance, including associated enablers, barriers, approaches, and outcomes. The database search yielded 5,580 records (after deduplication), and 62 articles covering 59 studies were included. These studies predominantly described Residents' Councils (n = 38; 64%) and enablers or barriers pertaining to resident and home perspectives, as well as implementation and sustainability infrastructure. Few studies described approaches to considerations of resident diversity (n = 8; 14%) or the presence of dementia and/or cognitive impairment (n = 12; 20%). Ten studies reported quantitative data evaluating resident engagement, and only four with resident-reported outcomes. Robust, evidence-informed frameworks that are co-designed with residents, staff, and others in the LTCH sector are needed to engage residents in their LTCHs.

倾听但很少听到:长期护理院组织设计和治理中居民参与的范围审查。
在一些司法管辖区,要求长期护理院(LTCHs)的居民参与其家庭环境、计划和运营,这可以改善居民的生活质量和其他结果。本综述总结了LTCH组织设计和治理中居民参与的现有研究,包括相关的推动因素、障碍、方法和结果。数据库搜索产生5580条记录(重复数据删除后),包括62篇文章,涵盖59项研究。这些研究主要描述了居民委员会(n = 38; 64%)、与居民和家庭观点有关的促成因素或障碍,以及实施和可持续性基础设施。很少有研究描述了考虑居民多样性(n = 8; 14%)或痴呆和/或认知障碍存在的方法(n = 12; 20%)。10项研究报告了评估居民参与度的定量数据,只有4项研究报告了居民报告的结果。需要与居民、工作人员和LTCH部门的其他人共同设计健全的、循证的框架,以使居民参与其LTCH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (CJA/RCV) promotes excellence in research and disseminates the latest work of researchers in the social sciences, humanities, health and biological sciences who study the older population of Canada and other countries; informs policy debates relevant to aging through the publication of the highest quality research; seeks to improve the quality of life for Canada"s older population and for older populations in other parts of the world through the publication of research that focuses on the broad range of relevant issues from income security to family relationships to service delivery and best practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信