Diversity in Gender, Race, and Specialty Among US Allopathic Medical School Leadership.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Julia Kessel, Peter N Drossopoulos, Smith M Ngeve, Grace Anne Longfellow, Shannelle Campbell, Luigi Pascarella
{"title":"Diversity in Gender, Race, and Specialty Among US Allopathic Medical School Leadership.","authors":"Julia Kessel, Peter N Drossopoulos, Smith M Ngeve, Grace Anne Longfellow, Shannelle Campbell, Luigi Pascarella","doi":"10.1177/23821205251384388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The demographic composition of United States (US) medical school leadership remains underexplored, despite growing recognition of workforce disparities in gender, race, and specialty. These gaps may affect patient care, mentorship, and education. This study examines demographic patterns in US allopathic medical school leaders relative to the broader physician and general US populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2023 to January 2024, we reviewed 154 US allopathic (MD) medical schools. We analyzed individual leadership structures and patterns in each institution. Institutional websites and publicly available sources were used to collect data on leadership demographics (gender, race, age), academic background (degrees, specialty), prior leadership roles, and research productivity via PubMed searches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 154 allopathic medical schools in 46 states met inclusion criteria. We identified 1097 individuals (56.97% male, 70.46% White/Asian) serving as Dean, Senior Associate Dean, Assistant Dean, or equivalent. Most leaders held an MD or equivalent (76.12%), while 23.79% held solely a PhD. The majority practiced nonprocedural specialties (61.71%) and had prior leadership roles, such as Department Chair/Vice Chair (34.28%) or Program Director/Associate Director for Residency or Fellowship (18.24%). Most held or had held professorships (68.55%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most allopathic medical school leaders come from nonprocedural specialties, which may influence students' mentorship access and specialty choices. With gender, race, and specialty disparities existing among medical leadership, diversification of these leaders could enhance the medical school learning environment, broaden mentorship, and help align the physician workforce with the population it serves.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251384388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251384388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The demographic composition of United States (US) medical school leadership remains underexplored, despite growing recognition of workforce disparities in gender, race, and specialty. These gaps may affect patient care, mentorship, and education. This study examines demographic patterns in US allopathic medical school leaders relative to the broader physician and general US populations.

Methods: From June 2023 to January 2024, we reviewed 154 US allopathic (MD) medical schools. We analyzed individual leadership structures and patterns in each institution. Institutional websites and publicly available sources were used to collect data on leadership demographics (gender, race, age), academic background (degrees, specialty), prior leadership roles, and research productivity via PubMed searches.

Results: In total, 154 allopathic medical schools in 46 states met inclusion criteria. We identified 1097 individuals (56.97% male, 70.46% White/Asian) serving as Dean, Senior Associate Dean, Assistant Dean, or equivalent. Most leaders held an MD or equivalent (76.12%), while 23.79% held solely a PhD. The majority practiced nonprocedural specialties (61.71%) and had prior leadership roles, such as Department Chair/Vice Chair (34.28%) or Program Director/Associate Director for Residency or Fellowship (18.24%). Most held or had held professorships (68.55%).

Conclusions: Most allopathic medical school leaders come from nonprocedural specialties, which may influence students' mentorship access and specialty choices. With gender, race, and specialty disparities existing among medical leadership, diversification of these leaders could enhance the medical school learning environment, broaden mentorship, and help align the physician workforce with the population it serves.

美国对抗疗法医学院领导层的性别、种族和专业多样性。
目的:尽管越来越多的人认识到性别、种族和专业方面的劳动力差异,但美国医学院领导层的人口构成仍未得到充分探讨。这些差距可能会影响患者护理、指导和教育。本研究考察了美国对抗疗法医学院领导人相对于更广泛的医生和一般美国人口的人口模式。方法:从2023年6月至2024年1月,我们回顾了154所美国对抗疗法(MD)医学院。我们分析了每个机构的个人领导结构和模式。研究人员利用机构网站和公开资源,通过PubMed搜索收集有关领导人口统计(性别、种族、年龄)、学术背景(学位、专业)、以前的领导角色和研究生产力的数据。结果:共有46个州的154所对抗疗法医学院符合纳入标准。我们确定了1097人(56.97%为男性,70.46%为白人/亚洲人)担任院长、高级副院长、助理院长或同等职位。大多数领导人拥有医学博士或同等学历(76.12%),而23.79%的人只拥有博士学位。大多数从事非程序性专业(61.71%),以前担任过领导职务,如系主任/副主席(34.28%)或住院医师或研究员项目主任/副主任(18.24%)。多数为教授或曾任教授(68.55%)。结论:大多数对抗疗法医学院领导来自非程序性专业,这可能会影响学生的师徒关系和专业选择。由于医学领导中存在性别、种族和专业差异,这些领导的多样化可以改善医学院的学习环境,扩大导师关系,并有助于使医生队伍与其服务的人群保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信