Alice Castro Menezes Xavier, Clarissa Prati, Anita Castro Menezes Xavier, Murilo G Brandão, Alice Barbieri Ebert, Malu Joyce de A Macedo, Maria João Baptista Fernandes, Gisele Gus Manfro, Carolina Blaya Dreher
{"title":"SOSkin: a randomized clinical trial of on-line cognitive-behavioral therapy for Skin Picking Disorder.","authors":"Alice Castro Menezes Xavier, Clarissa Prati, Anita Castro Menezes Xavier, Murilo G Brandão, Alice Barbieri Ebert, Malu Joyce de A Macedo, Maria João Baptista Fernandes, Gisele Gus Manfro, Carolina Blaya Dreher","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for Skin Picking Disorder (SPD). However, since individuals have limited access to CBT, telepsychotherapy can overcome this barrier.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the efficacy of a self-guided digital CBT intervention for SPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This controlled clinical trial randomized 163 patients with SPD to receive 4 weeks of online CBT (SOSkin) or a control intervention (videos about quality of life). Primary outcome was the improvement in the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R) and secondary outcomes were the improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index Scale (DLQI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment Scale (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale (PHQ-9). Instruments were applied at baseline, middle and end of intervention and at 1 and 3 months of follow up. SOSkin usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Data were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference between groups in completion rates. SOSkin has excellent usability. Both groups improved the SPS-R and the DLQI scores after treatment and at the follow-up assessments. We found a significant time*group interaction in favor of CBT on SPS-R. Effect size of the intervention compared to control over SPS-R was small after treatment and at the follow-ups; over the DLQI was moderate after treatment and small at the follow-ups. CBT was superior to control on SPS-R when we compared the percentage of change from baseline. CBT was superior to control condition over DLQI at the end of treatment and at 1 month follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for Skin Picking Disorder (SPD). However, since individuals have limited access to CBT, telepsychotherapy can overcome this barrier.
Objective: Evaluate the efficacy of a self-guided digital CBT intervention for SPD.
Methods: This controlled clinical trial randomized 163 patients with SPD to receive 4 weeks of online CBT (SOSkin) or a control intervention (videos about quality of life). Primary outcome was the improvement in the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R) and secondary outcomes were the improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index Scale (DLQI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment Scale (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale (PHQ-9). Instruments were applied at baseline, middle and end of intervention and at 1 and 3 months of follow up. SOSkin usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Data were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE).
Conclusion: There was no difference between groups in completion rates. SOSkin has excellent usability. Both groups improved the SPS-R and the DLQI scores after treatment and at the follow-up assessments. We found a significant time*group interaction in favor of CBT on SPS-R. Effect size of the intervention compared to control over SPS-R was small after treatment and at the follow-ups; over the DLQI was moderate after treatment and small at the follow-ups. CBT was superior to control on SPS-R when we compared the percentage of change from baseline. CBT was superior to control condition over DLQI at the end of treatment and at 1 month follow-up.