A Qualitative Description Study of the Patient's Experience With Community-Based Virtual Crisis Care in Canada: Illustrating the Potential Positives and Negatives of Remote Support on Recovery.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735251360511
Angela Buchel, Jocelyne Lemoine, James M Bolton, Jennifer M Hensel
{"title":"A Qualitative Description Study of the Patient's Experience With Community-Based Virtual Crisis Care in Canada: Illustrating the Potential Positives and Negatives of Remote Support on Recovery.","authors":"Angela Buchel, Jocelyne Lemoine, James M Bolton, Jennifer M Hensel","doi":"10.1177/23743735251360511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study's objective is to describe how individuals accessing a virtual crisis stabilization program following discharge from an emergency mental health visit perceived the service as either facilitating or hindering recovery. Interested service users were identified through feedback surveys and contacted for an interview. Demographic and service utilization variables were obtained from the survey data. Interview data were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach focused on exploring perspectives related to recovery. Twenty-one participants were interviewed; one with a support person. Four recovery thematic categories were identified: (1) connection to others is possible or lacking; (2) access to care providers/therapeutic relationship; (3) ability to remain at home; and (4) virtual service provision. Each category generated subthemes that demonstrated both positive and negative impacts of the virtual service. Lived experience highlights typical aspects of crisis intervention, as well as unique themes related to the home environment and virtual care option. It is important to identify these contextual factors when determining if virtual care is right for an individual. Some areas for service improvement were also highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735251360511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251360511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study's objective is to describe how individuals accessing a virtual crisis stabilization program following discharge from an emergency mental health visit perceived the service as either facilitating or hindering recovery. Interested service users were identified through feedback surveys and contacted for an interview. Demographic and service utilization variables were obtained from the survey data. Interview data were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach focused on exploring perspectives related to recovery. Twenty-one participants were interviewed; one with a support person. Four recovery thematic categories were identified: (1) connection to others is possible or lacking; (2) access to care providers/therapeutic relationship; (3) ability to remain at home; and (4) virtual service provision. Each category generated subthemes that demonstrated both positive and negative impacts of the virtual service. Lived experience highlights typical aspects of crisis intervention, as well as unique themes related to the home environment and virtual care option. It is important to identify these contextual factors when determining if virtual care is right for an individual. Some areas for service improvement were also highlighted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

加拿大基于社区的虚拟危机护理患者体验的定性描述研究:说明远程支持对康复的潜在积极和消极影响。
该研究的目的是描述在紧急心理健康访问出院后访问虚拟危机稳定计划的个人如何认为该服务是促进还是阻碍康复。通过反馈调查确定感兴趣的服务用户,并联系他们进行面谈。从调查数据中获得人口统计和服务利用变量。访谈数据采用归纳方法进行主题分析,重点探讨与康复相关的观点。采访了21名参与者;一个有支持的人。确定了四个恢复主题类别:(1)可能或缺乏与他人的联系;(2)获得护理人员/治疗关系;(三)有居住能力;(4)虚拟服务提供。每个类别都产生了展示虚拟服务的积极和消极影响的子主题。生活体验强调了危机干预的典型方面,以及与家庭环境和虚拟护理选项相关的独特主题。在确定虚拟护理是否适合个人时,确定这些背景因素是很重要的。此外,还强调了一些有待改善的服务领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信