Intrarenal venous flow patterns and their association with successful fluid removal in critically ill patients: a prospective observational exploratory study.

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine
Chailat Maluangnon, Apatsara Saokaew, Satit Rojwatcharapibarn, Ranistha Ratanarat
{"title":"Intrarenal venous flow patterns and their association with successful fluid removal in critically ill patients: a prospective observational exploratory study.","authors":"Chailat Maluangnon, Apatsara Saokaew, Satit Rojwatcharapibarn, Ranistha Ratanarat","doi":"10.1186/s13089-025-00447-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Determining the optimal timing for fluid removal in critically ill patients remains a challenge. This study evaluated the utility of Doppler ultrasound, specifically intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) patterns and venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) scores, and their associations with fluid removal outcomes, hemodynamic parameters, and clinical endpoints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational exploratory study, 52 intensive care unit (ICU) patients who underwent fluid removal were enrolled. Baseline IRVF patterns and VExUS scores were assessed, with follow-up evaluations performed daily for three days. The primary outcome was to evaluate whether IRVF patterns were associated with successful fluid removal, defined as achieving a negative fluid balance for at least two consecutive days. Secondary outcomes included associations with central venous pressure (CVP), NT-proBNP, cumulative fluid balance, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients (59.6%) achieved successful fluid removal. A discontinuous baseline IRVF pattern was independently associated with successful fluid removal (adjusted odds ratio 4.31, 95% CI 1.02-18.18; P = 0.047). This pattern demonstrated high sensitivity of 87.1% (95% CI 70.2-96.4), moderate specificity of 42.9% (95% CI 21.8-66.0), and accuracy of 69.2% (95% CI 54.9-81.3). VExUS scores grades 2-3 demonstrated high specificity of 85.7% (95% CI 63.7-97.0) but low sensitivity of 29.0% (95% CI 14.2-48.0), with an accuracy of 51.9% (95% CI 37.6-66.0). An improvement in the IRVF pattern was significantly correlated with a reduction in NT-proBNP levels (P = 0.048). However, neither IRVF patterns nor VExUS scores improvements were associated with changes in fluid balance, CVP, or clinical outcomes such as 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, or ICU length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discontinuous IRVF patterns at baseline were significantly associated with fluid removal success, representing a physiologically based marker for deresuscitation readiness. More large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore long-term implications. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06216119. Registered 22 January 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06216119.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00447-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Determining the optimal timing for fluid removal in critically ill patients remains a challenge. This study evaluated the utility of Doppler ultrasound, specifically intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) patterns and venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) scores, and their associations with fluid removal outcomes, hemodynamic parameters, and clinical endpoints.

Methods: In this prospective observational exploratory study, 52 intensive care unit (ICU) patients who underwent fluid removal were enrolled. Baseline IRVF patterns and VExUS scores were assessed, with follow-up evaluations performed daily for three days. The primary outcome was to evaluate whether IRVF patterns were associated with successful fluid removal, defined as achieving a negative fluid balance for at least two consecutive days. Secondary outcomes included associations with central venous pressure (CVP), NT-proBNP, cumulative fluid balance, and clinical outcomes.

Results: Thirty-one patients (59.6%) achieved successful fluid removal. A discontinuous baseline IRVF pattern was independently associated with successful fluid removal (adjusted odds ratio 4.31, 95% CI 1.02-18.18; P = 0.047). This pattern demonstrated high sensitivity of 87.1% (95% CI 70.2-96.4), moderate specificity of 42.9% (95% CI 21.8-66.0), and accuracy of 69.2% (95% CI 54.9-81.3). VExUS scores grades 2-3 demonstrated high specificity of 85.7% (95% CI 63.7-97.0) but low sensitivity of 29.0% (95% CI 14.2-48.0), with an accuracy of 51.9% (95% CI 37.6-66.0). An improvement in the IRVF pattern was significantly correlated with a reduction in NT-proBNP levels (P = 0.048). However, neither IRVF patterns nor VExUS scores improvements were associated with changes in fluid balance, CVP, or clinical outcomes such as 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, or ICU length of stay.

Conclusions: Discontinuous IRVF patterns at baseline were significantly associated with fluid removal success, representing a physiologically based marker for deresuscitation readiness. More large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore long-term implications. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06216119. Registered 22 January 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06216119.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

危重病人肾内静脉流动模式及其与成功取液的关系:一项前瞻性观察性探索性研究。
背景:确定危重患者液体清除的最佳时机仍然是一个挑战。本研究评估了多普勒超声的效用,特别是肾内静脉流量(IRVF)模式和静脉过量超声(VExUS)评分,以及它们与液体清除结果、血流动力学参数和临床终点的关系。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性探索性研究中,纳入了52例接受液体取出的重症监护病房患者。评估基线IRVF模式和VExUS评分,并每天进行为期三天的随访评估。主要结果是评估IRVF模式是否与成功的液体清除相关,定义为至少连续两天达到负流体平衡。次要结局包括与中心静脉压(CVP)、NT-proBNP、累积体液平衡和临床结局的关联。结果:31例患者(59.6%)成功排液。不连续的基线IRVF模式与成功的液体清除独立相关(校正优势比4.31,95% CI 1.02-18.18; P = 0.047)。该模式的高灵敏度为87.1% (95% CI 70.2-96.4),中等特异性为42.9% (95% CI 21.8-66.0),准确度为69.2% (95% CI 54.9-81.3)。VExUS评分2-3级的高特异性为85.7% (95% CI 63.7-97.0),但低敏感性为29.0% (95% CI 14.2-48.0),准确率为51.9% (95% CI 37.6-66.0)。IRVF模式的改善与NT-proBNP水平的降低显著相关(P = 0.048)。然而,IRVF模式和VExUS评分的改善都与体液平衡、CVP或临床结果(如28天死亡率、无呼吸机天数或ICU住院时间)的变化无关。结论:基线时间断的IRVF模式与液体清除成功显著相关,这是基于生理学的去复苏准备的标志。需要更多的大规模研究来验证这些发现并探索长期影响。临床试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov识别码NCT06216119。2024年1月22日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06216119。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信