Reliability of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) Scoring Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate (HoLEP).

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Benjamin N Schmeusser, Jason L Zappia, Kyle R Edwards, Kate H Adaniya, Justin K Kim, Kevin R Rice, Ronald S Boris, Marcelino E Rivera, Thomas M Shelton
{"title":"Reliability of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) Scoring Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate (HoLEP).","authors":"Benjamin N Schmeusser, Jason L Zappia, Kyle R Edwards, Kate H Adaniya, Justin K Kim, Kevin R Rice, Ronald S Boris, Marcelino E Rivera, Thomas M Shelton","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring following HoLEP can reliably predict detection of prostate cancer on prostate biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent HoLEP followed by prostate MRI, targeted prostate biopsy, and systematic biopsy at a single institution from 2012 to 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on highest PI-RADS score noted on prostate MRI. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were gathered, and multivariate analyses were performed. Prevalence of prostate cancer detection based on PIRADS score were calculated. Locations of PIRADS lesions were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 patients who underwent HoLEP followed by prostate MRI and targeted biopsy were included in our analysis. In post-HoLEP patients with PI-RADS lesions of 3, 4 or 5, clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 66.7%, 59%, and 100% of patients on biopsy, respectively. 83% (n=5) of patients with PI-RADS 1-2 lesions were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer on systematic biopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prostate MRI and the PI-RADS system to detect prostate cancer does appear to have utility in patients that underwent HoLEP. A high proportion of patients with low PI-RADS scores were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer on systematic biopsy, however, therefore PI-RADS scoring alone should not impact a clinician's decision of whether to perform prostate biopsy. Additional characteristics such as PSA, PSA density or PSA kinetics should also be considered when determining when to perform prostate biopsy in post HoLEP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring following HoLEP can reliably predict detection of prostate cancer on prostate biopsy.

Methods: Patients who underwent HoLEP followed by prostate MRI, targeted prostate biopsy, and systematic biopsy at a single institution from 2012 to 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on highest PI-RADS score noted on prostate MRI. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were gathered, and multivariate analyses were performed. Prevalence of prostate cancer detection based on PIRADS score were calculated. Locations of PIRADS lesions were also documented.

Results: 44 patients who underwent HoLEP followed by prostate MRI and targeted biopsy were included in our analysis. In post-HoLEP patients with PI-RADS lesions of 3, 4 or 5, clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 66.7%, 59%, and 100% of patients on biopsy, respectively. 83% (n=5) of patients with PI-RADS 1-2 lesions were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer on systematic biopsy.

Conclusions: Prostate MRI and the PI-RADS system to detect prostate cancer does appear to have utility in patients that underwent HoLEP. A high proportion of patients with low PI-RADS scores were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer on systematic biopsy, however, therefore PI-RADS scoring alone should not impact a clinician's decision of whether to perform prostate biopsy. Additional characteristics such as PSA, PSA density or PSA kinetics should also be considered when determining when to perform prostate biopsy in post HoLEP patients.

钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)后前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)评分的可靠性。
目的:探讨HoLEP后前列腺MRI PI-RADS评分能否可靠预测前列腺活检中前列腺癌的检出。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2024年在单一机构接受HoLEP后前列腺MRI、靶向前列腺活检和系统活检的患者。根据前列腺MRI记录的最高PI-RADS评分对患者进行分组。收集患者人口统计学和临床特征,并进行多变量分析。根据PIRADS评分计算前列腺癌的检出率。PIRADS病变的位置也被记录下来。结果:44例HoLEP患者行前列腺MRI和靶向活检纳入我们的分析。在PI-RADS病变为3,4或5的holep后患者中,活检检出具有临床意义的前列腺癌的患者分别为66.7%,59%和100%。83% (n=5) PI-RADS 1-2病变患者在系统活检中发现有临床意义的前列腺癌。结论:前列腺MRI和PI-RADS系统检测前列腺癌似乎在HoLEP患者中有实用价值。然而,在系统活检中,有很高比例的PI-RADS评分较低的患者被发现患有临床显著的前列腺癌,因此,单独的PI-RADS评分不应影响临床医生是否进行前列腺活检的决定。在确定HoLEP后患者何时进行前列腺活检时,还应考虑其他特征,如PSA、PSA密度或PSA动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信