Evaluation of retention cavity geometry and ferrule effect in maxillary central incisors restored with anatomically shaped glass fiber post: a finite element analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Burcu Özer, Sercan Sabancı, Muhittin Toman
{"title":"Evaluation of retention cavity geometry and ferrule effect in maxillary central incisors restored with anatomically shaped glass fiber post: a finite element analysis.","authors":"Burcu Özer, Sercan Sabancı, Muhittin Toman","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6628534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the influence of two novel internal retention cavity designs and the presence of a ferrule on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with anatomically shaped fiber posts using finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>The models were divided into ferrule-present and ferrule-free groups and further subdivided according to cavity configuration: no additional retention, Retention Area 1, and Retention Area 2. A static oblique load of 100 N at 45° was applied to the palatal surface, 2 mm from the incisal edge. All simulations were conducted in ANSYS under standardized boundary conditions, with dentin stresses prioritized as dentin represents the primary load-bearing structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ferrule-free reference model showed the highest dentin stress (187.54 MPa, σ = 7.40 MPa), indicating increased fracture risk. In the absence of a ferrule, Retention Area 1 reduced peak dentin stress substantially (62.74 MPa, σ = 4.12 MPa) and produced the most uniform stress distribution, while Retention Area 2 also lowered stresses compared with the reference (σ = 5.36 MPa). In the ferrule-present groups, stresses were overall lower, confirming the ferrule's protective role; within this group, Retention Area 1 recorded the lowest dentin stress (82.18 MPa).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ferrule remains biomechanically critical for preserving cervical dentin. However, in cases where a ferrule cannot be achieved, retention-oriented cavity designs demonstrated potential as a clinically viable alternative, though further validation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6628534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the influence of two novel internal retention cavity designs and the presence of a ferrule on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with anatomically shaped fiber posts using finite element analysis (FEA).

Method and materials: The models were divided into ferrule-present and ferrule-free groups and further subdivided according to cavity configuration: no additional retention, Retention Area 1, and Retention Area 2. A static oblique load of 100 N at 45° was applied to the palatal surface, 2 mm from the incisal edge. All simulations were conducted in ANSYS under standardized boundary conditions, with dentin stresses prioritized as dentin represents the primary load-bearing structure.

Results: The ferrule-free reference model showed the highest dentin stress (187.54 MPa, σ = 7.40 MPa), indicating increased fracture risk. In the absence of a ferrule, Retention Area 1 reduced peak dentin stress substantially (62.74 MPa, σ = 4.12 MPa) and produced the most uniform stress distribution, while Retention Area 2 also lowered stresses compared with the reference (σ = 5.36 MPa). In the ferrule-present groups, stresses were overall lower, confirming the ferrule's protective role; within this group, Retention Area 1 recorded the lowest dentin stress (82.18 MPa).

Conclusion: The ferrule remains biomechanically critical for preserving cervical dentin. However, in cases where a ferrule cannot be achieved, retention-oriented cavity designs demonstrated potential as a clinically viable alternative, though further validation is required.

解剖形玻璃纤维桩修复上颌中切牙固位腔几何形状及卡箍效果评价:有限元分析。
目的:本研究利用有限元分析(FEA)评估两种新型内固位腔设计和卡箍的存在对解剖形状纤维桩修复的根管治疗上颌中切牙应力分布的影响。方法与材料:将模型分为有卡箍组和无卡箍组,并根据空腔形态进一步细分为无额外滞留、滞留区1和滞留区2。在距切缘2 mm的腭面施加45°100 N的静态斜载荷。所有模拟均在标准化边界条件下的ANSYS中进行,牙本质是主要的承重结构,因此优先考虑牙本质应力。结果:无铁箍参考模型牙本质应力最大(187.54 MPa, σ = 7.40 MPa),表明牙本质断裂风险增大。在不加卡箍的情况下,保留区1的牙本质峰值应力降低幅度最大(62.74 MPa, σ = 4.12 MPa),应力分布最均匀;保留区2的牙本质峰值应力也较参考区(σ = 5.36 MPa)有所降低。在有铁箍的组中,应力总体较低,证实了铁箍的保护作用;保留区1牙本质应力最低,为82.18 MPa。结论:从生物力学角度看,卡箍对保护颈牙本质具有重要作用。然而,在无法实现卡套的情况下,尽管需要进一步验证,但以保留为导向的腔体设计证明了其作为临床可行替代方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信