"I'm Treated Way Differently": The Intersectional Risk Environment of Maternal Cannabis Use.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Erin E Gould, Siddhi S Ganesh, Rachel Carmen Ceasar
{"title":"\"I'm Treated Way Differently\": The Intersectional Risk Environment of Maternal Cannabis Use.","authors":"Erin E Gould, Siddhi S Ganesh, Rachel Carmen Ceasar","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2025.2568153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This research aimed to understand the perspectives and experiences of pregnant individuals using cannabis as they navigate healthcare settings and their pregnancies. We applied the lens of the intersectional risk environment, a harm reduction framework which explores the ways that social locations and environmental factors combine to impact health and well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using qualitative, constructivist grounded theory methods, we conducted interviews with 19 participants between December 2022 and March 2023. Individuals self-identified as racially minoritized, were 21 years of age and older, spoke English/Spanish, resided in California, and had used cannabis during pregnancy in the last 0-2 years. We used constructivist grounded theory methods to analyze the socio-structural contexts and lived experiences surrounding cannabis use and disclosure to clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who used cannabis during pregnancy described: 1) how their race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status impacted their care experiences together with their cannabis use, 2) their experience of poor perinatal care due to their insurance coverage and location of care, 3) worsening of care after disclosing cannabis use (e.g., being judged, ignored), and 4) removal from perinatal care after disclosing cannabis use.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study showed how patients' use of cannabis during pregnancy and their insurance status, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic level impacted the care they received across the perinatal period. Our findings emphasize the need for the multi-level import of an intersectional risk environment framework which addresses health inequities <i>via</i> a social justice-oriented lens. This can be operationalized <i>via</i> interventions that take place at the patient-clinician, institutional, and policy levels which acknowledge patients' overlapping identities to mitigate experiences of stigma and discrimination which are prevalent in perinatal care spaces today.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2568153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This research aimed to understand the perspectives and experiences of pregnant individuals using cannabis as they navigate healthcare settings and their pregnancies. We applied the lens of the intersectional risk environment, a harm reduction framework which explores the ways that social locations and environmental factors combine to impact health and well-being.

Methods: Using qualitative, constructivist grounded theory methods, we conducted interviews with 19 participants between December 2022 and March 2023. Individuals self-identified as racially minoritized, were 21 years of age and older, spoke English/Spanish, resided in California, and had used cannabis during pregnancy in the last 0-2 years. We used constructivist grounded theory methods to analyze the socio-structural contexts and lived experiences surrounding cannabis use and disclosure to clinicians.

Results: Participants who used cannabis during pregnancy described: 1) how their race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status impacted their care experiences together with their cannabis use, 2) their experience of poor perinatal care due to their insurance coverage and location of care, 3) worsening of care after disclosing cannabis use (e.g., being judged, ignored), and 4) removal from perinatal care after disclosing cannabis use.

Discussion: Our study showed how patients' use of cannabis during pregnancy and their insurance status, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic level impacted the care they received across the perinatal period. Our findings emphasize the need for the multi-level import of an intersectional risk environment framework which addresses health inequities via a social justice-oriented lens. This can be operationalized via interventions that take place at the patient-clinician, institutional, and policy levels which acknowledge patients' overlapping identities to mitigate experiences of stigma and discrimination which are prevalent in perinatal care spaces today.

“我被区别对待”:产妇使用大麻的交叉风险环境。
简介:本研究旨在了解怀孕的个人使用大麻的观点和经验,因为他们导航卫生保健设置和他们的怀孕。我们应用了交叉风险环境的镜头,这是一个减少伤害的框架,探索社会位置和环境因素结合起来影响健康和福祉的方式。方法:在2022年12月至2023年3月期间,采用定性的、建构主义的扎根理论方法对19名参与者进行了访谈。自我认定为少数种族的个体,年龄在21岁及以上,说英语/西班牙语,居住在加利福尼亚州,在过去的0-2年里在怀孕期间使用过大麻。我们使用建构主义接地理论方法来分析社会结构背景和生活经验的大麻使用和披露给临床医生。结果:在怀孕期间使用大麻的参与者描述了:1)他们的种族/民族,性别和社会经济地位如何影响他们的护理经历以及他们的大麻使用,2)由于他们的保险覆盖范围和护理地点而导致的围产期护理不佳的经历,3)披露大麻使用后护理恶化(例如,被评判,被忽视),以及4)披露大麻使用后被取消围产期护理。讨论:我们的研究显示了患者在怀孕期间使用大麻及其保险状况、性别、种族/民族和社会经济水平如何影响他们在围产期接受的护理。我们的研究结果强调需要多层次的交叉风险环境框架,通过社会正义导向的镜头解决健康不平等问题。这可以通过在患者-临床医生、机构和政策层面采取的干预措施来实施,这些干预措施承认患者的重叠身份,以减轻目前在围产期护理场所普遍存在的耻辱和歧视经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信