Pilot Study: Evaluating Pillar Pain Outcomes Following Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery With Fractional CO2 Laser Therapy.

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-10-02 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007189
Caroline J Cushman, Brennon G Henderson, Wm Zachary Salter, Andrew F Ibrahim, Evan J Hernandez, Brendan J MacKay
{"title":"Pilot Study: Evaluating Pillar Pain Outcomes Following Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery With Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser Therapy.","authors":"Caroline J Cushman, Brennon G Henderson, Wm Zachary Salter, Andrew F Ibrahim, Evan J Hernandez, Brendan J MacKay","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb, and pillar pain is a frequent, often debilitating complication following carpal tunnel release (CTR). Traditional treatment modalities, including corticosteroid injections, deep tissue massage, and medications, may fail to adequately relieve symptoms. Fractional carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) laser therapy has shown promise in scar management and analgesia, but its use for pillar pain remains understudied. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy in reducing pillar pain after CTR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed at a tertiary referral center between 2021 and 2024. Patients who developed pillar pain after CTR and subsequently underwent fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser treatment were included. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected, including comorbidities, incision type, laser treatment parameters, and medication use. Outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores and SCAR-Q survey results assessing scar appearance, symptoms, and psychosocial impact. Pre- and posttreatment pain scores were compared using paired <i>t</i> tests with significance set at <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 procedures in 23 patients were identified. The mean prelaser visual analog scale pain score of 5.23 significantly decreased to 1.87 after treatment (mean decrease 3.37, <i>P</i> < 0.00001). SCAR-Q (Appearance, Symptom, and Psychosocial Impact) scores demonstrated positive outcomes in appearance (73.5), symptoms (85.0), and psychosocial impact (85.0). Most patients (91%) reported improvement in pain, and no adverse outcomes were observed. Patients with higher body mass index reported higher residual pain levels, although still improved compared with baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy significantly reduced pillar pain and improved patient satisfaction following CTR, with no reported complications. This pilot study suggests that fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser may serve as a safe, effective alternative for refractory pillar pain. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and determine broader applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 10","pages":"e7189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb, and pillar pain is a frequent, often debilitating complication following carpal tunnel release (CTR). Traditional treatment modalities, including corticosteroid injections, deep tissue massage, and medications, may fail to adequately relieve symptoms. Fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy has shown promise in scar management and analgesia, but its use for pillar pain remains understudied. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of fractional CO2 laser therapy in reducing pillar pain after CTR.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at a tertiary referral center between 2021 and 2024. Patients who developed pillar pain after CTR and subsequently underwent fractional CO2 laser treatment were included. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected, including comorbidities, incision type, laser treatment parameters, and medication use. Outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores and SCAR-Q survey results assessing scar appearance, symptoms, and psychosocial impact. Pre- and posttreatment pain scores were compared using paired t tests with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: A total of 30 procedures in 23 patients were identified. The mean prelaser visual analog scale pain score of 5.23 significantly decreased to 1.87 after treatment (mean decrease 3.37, P < 0.00001). SCAR-Q (Appearance, Symptom, and Psychosocial Impact) scores demonstrated positive outcomes in appearance (73.5), symptoms (85.0), and psychosocial impact (85.0). Most patients (91%) reported improvement in pain, and no adverse outcomes were observed. Patients with higher body mass index reported higher residual pain levels, although still improved compared with baseline.

Conclusions: Fractional CO2 laser therapy significantly reduced pillar pain and improved patient satisfaction following CTR, with no reported complications. This pilot study suggests that fractional CO2 laser may serve as a safe, effective alternative for refractory pillar pain. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and determine broader applicability.

初步研究:评估部分CO2激光治疗腕管释放手术后支柱疼痛的结果。
背景:腕管综合征是上肢最常见的外周压迫性神经病变,而柱痛是腕管释放(CTR)后最常见的并发症。传统的治疗方式,包括皮质类固醇注射、深层组织按摩和药物治疗,可能无法充分缓解症状。部分二氧化碳(CO2)激光治疗在疤痕管理和镇痛方面显示出前景,但其用于支柱性疼痛仍有待研究。本初步研究评估了部分CO2激光治疗减轻CTR后脊柱疼痛的疗效。方法:对某三级转诊中心在2021 - 2024年间的病例进行回顾性分析。CTR后出现柱痛并随后接受CO2激光分步治疗的患者纳入研究。收集了人口统计学、临床和治疗数据,包括合并症、切口类型、激光治疗参数和药物使用。结果包括视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和评估疤痕外观、症状和心理社会影响的scar - q调查结果。治疗前后疼痛评分采用配对t检验,P < 0.05为显著性。结果:23例患者共确定30种手术方式。治疗后视觉模拟疼痛评分由5.23分下降至1.87分(平均下降3.37分,P < 0.00001)。SCAR-Q(外观、症状和社会心理影响)评分在外观(73.5)、症状(85.0)和社会心理影响(85.0)方面显示出积极的结果。大多数患者(91%)报告疼痛改善,未观察到不良后果。体重指数较高的患者报告的残余疼痛水平较高,尽管与基线相比仍有所改善。结论:部分CO2激光治疗可显著减少脊柱疼痛,提高CTR后患者满意度,无并发症报道。这项初步研究表明,部分CO2激光可以作为一种安全、有效的治疗难治性柱痛的替代方法。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现并确定更广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信