Predictors of Dissatisfaction After Polydioxanone Thread Lift: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-10-02 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007190
Kohki Okumura, Takahiko Tamura, Yusuke Funakoshi, Hiroo Teranishi
{"title":"Predictors of Dissatisfaction After Polydioxanone Thread Lift: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Kohki Okumura, Takahiko Tamura, Yusuke Funakoshi, Hiroo Teranishi","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polydioxanone (PDO) thread lift is a widely used technique for minimally invasive facial rejuvenation. Although the technical outcomes and complications are well-documented, postoperative dissatisfaction remains underexplored, particularly among large multicenter cohorts. This study aimed to identify the predictors of dissatisfaction after PDO thread lift.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1500 patients who underwent PDO thread lifts at cosmetic surgery clinics in Japan. Postoperative dissatisfaction was defined as a return visit due to insufficient results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluated the associations between age, thread count, sex, and dissatisfaction. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff values using the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative dissatisfaction was reported in 51 (3.4%) patients, with age (odds ratio = 1.06; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.08; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and thread count (odds ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.16; <i>P</i> = 0.001) as significant predictors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal cutoff of 43 years (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.701; sensitivity = 0.725; specificity = 0.615) and 10 threads (AUC = 0.674; sensitivity = 0.784; specificity = 0.566). The AUC of the combined multivariate model was 0.754.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased age and higher thread count were independent predictors of dissatisfaction after PDO thread lifts. These findings underscore the need for individualized risk stratification, age- and volume-adapted thread strategies, and preoperative counseling to align expectations with realistic procedural outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 10","pages":"e7190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Polydioxanone (PDO) thread lift is a widely used technique for minimally invasive facial rejuvenation. Although the technical outcomes and complications are well-documented, postoperative dissatisfaction remains underexplored, particularly among large multicenter cohorts. This study aimed to identify the predictors of dissatisfaction after PDO thread lift.

Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1500 patients who underwent PDO thread lifts at cosmetic surgery clinics in Japan. Postoperative dissatisfaction was defined as a return visit due to insufficient results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluated the associations between age, thread count, sex, and dissatisfaction. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff values using the Youden index.

Results: Postoperative dissatisfaction was reported in 51 (3.4%) patients, with age (odds ratio = 1.06; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.08; P < 0.001) and thread count (odds ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.16; P = 0.001) as significant predictors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal cutoff of 43 years (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.701; sensitivity = 0.725; specificity = 0.615) and 10 threads (AUC = 0.674; sensitivity = 0.784; specificity = 0.566). The AUC of the combined multivariate model was 0.754.

Conclusions: Increased age and higher thread count were independent predictors of dissatisfaction after PDO thread lifts. These findings underscore the need for individualized risk stratification, age- and volume-adapted thread strategies, and preoperative counseling to align expectations with realistic procedural outcomes.

聚二氧环酮螺纹提升后不满意的预测因素:一项多中心回顾性分析。
背景:聚二氧环酮(PDO)提线术是一种广泛应用于微创面部年轻化的技术。尽管技术结果和并发症有充分的文献记载,但术后不满意的情况仍未得到充分的研究,特别是在大型多中心队列中。本研究旨在找出PDO螺纹提升后不满意的预测因素。方法:我们对在日本整容诊所接受PDO线提升术的1500例患者进行了多中心回顾性分析。术后不满意定义为由于结果不充分而回访。单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析评估了年龄、纱线数、性别和不满意度之间的关系。采用约登指数进行受试者工作特征曲线分析,确定最佳截止值。结果:51例(3.4%)患者报告术后不满意,年龄(优势比= 1.06;95%可信区间= 1.03-1.08;P = 0.001)为显著预测因素。通过受试者工作特征分析,确定了43年(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.701,灵敏度= 0.725,特异性= 0.615)和10条线(AUC = 0.674,灵敏度= 0.784,特异性= 0.566)的最佳截止时间。联合多元模型的AUC为0.754。结论:年龄的增加和较高的螺纹数是PDO螺纹提升后不满意的独立预测因素。这些发现强调了个体化风险分层、年龄和容量适应的线程策略以及术前咨询的必要性,以使期望与现实的手术结果保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信