{"title":"Reliability and Accuracy of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Providing General Information on Migraine Surgery.","authors":"Edoardo Raposio, Ilaria Baldelli","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous publicly available generative artificial intelligence tools have been introduced, aimed at research use or for the general public. The aim of this study was to investigate what information could be obtained by querying 9 of these publicly available software tools regarding the possible outcomes and complications of migraine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We consulted 9 of the most well-known and widely used generative artificial intelligence tools: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Elicit, SciSpace, Consensus, PaperPal, Julius, and Mistral AI. Each tool was asked the same question: \"Detail the outcomes and complications of migraine surgery.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results we obtained were, on the whole, very satisfactory. All the tools used, in addition to being extremely fast, provided sensible and scientifically reliable answers, albeit with varying degrees of accuracy. The accuracy of the answers provided was found to be directly proportional to the number of scientific references each tool used to generate its response. The tools that provided the most complete and detailed answers were, in order, Consensus, SciSpace, Perplexity, and ChatGPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the answers provided by all the software, the universally accepted principles of migraine surgery were accurately listed, both in terms of outcomes and the rate and severity of complications. Regarding outcomes, the high success rate of the procedure was consistently emphasized.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 10","pages":"e7176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Numerous publicly available generative artificial intelligence tools have been introduced, aimed at research use or for the general public. The aim of this study was to investigate what information could be obtained by querying 9 of these publicly available software tools regarding the possible outcomes and complications of migraine surgery.
Methods: We consulted 9 of the most well-known and widely used generative artificial intelligence tools: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Elicit, SciSpace, Consensus, PaperPal, Julius, and Mistral AI. Each tool was asked the same question: "Detail the outcomes and complications of migraine surgery."
Results: The results we obtained were, on the whole, very satisfactory. All the tools used, in addition to being extremely fast, provided sensible and scientifically reliable answers, albeit with varying degrees of accuracy. The accuracy of the answers provided was found to be directly proportional to the number of scientific references each tool used to generate its response. The tools that provided the most complete and detailed answers were, in order, Consensus, SciSpace, Perplexity, and ChatGPT.
Conclusions: In the answers provided by all the software, the universally accepted principles of migraine surgery were accurately listed, both in terms of outcomes and the rate and severity of complications. Regarding outcomes, the high success rate of the procedure was consistently emphasized.
期刊介绍：
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
