Nerve Repair for Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Outcomes.

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-10-02 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007165
Edwin Chrabieh, Paul Beaineh, Towfik Sebai, Abdul Jabar Chekfa, Fadi Ghieh, Kareem Makkawi, Bishara Atiyeh, Bassel Bachir, Amir Ibrahim
{"title":"Nerve Repair for Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Outcomes.","authors":"Edwin Chrabieh, Paul Beaineh, Towfik Sebai, Abdul Jabar Chekfa, Fadi Ghieh, Kareem Makkawi, Bishara Atiyeh, Bassel Bachir, Amir Ibrahim","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent complication after radical prostatectomy (RP), affecting up to 89% of patients within 2-5 years due to cavernous nerve injury. Nerve grafting has been proposed as a strategy to restore erectile function, but outcomes remain inconsistent, and randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results. This review evaluated the effectiveness of nerve grafting techniques for ED management after RP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted using terms related to ED, nerve grafting, and cavernous nerve repair. From 239 initial studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on human subjects and reporting outcomes of unilateral or bilateral nerve grafting with autologous donor nerves, such as the sural and genitofemoral nerves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bilateral sural nerve grafting demonstrated the highest recovery rates, with up to 71% of patients regaining erectile function sufficient for intercourse. Adjunctive therapies like sildenafil were frequently used to enhance outcomes. However, randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant improvements compared with controls, raising questions about the efficacy of nerve grafting. Variability in outcomes seemed to be influenced by donor nerve choice, surgical expertise, and patient characteristics, such as age and baseline function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although bilateral sural nerve grafting offers promising results, its overall efficacy is uncertain due to inconsistent findings and limitations of existing studies. Larger, standardized trials are essential to clarify its role in ED management after RP and to optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 10","pages":"e7165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent complication after radical prostatectomy (RP), affecting up to 89% of patients within 2-5 years due to cavernous nerve injury. Nerve grafting has been proposed as a strategy to restore erectile function, but outcomes remain inconsistent, and randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results. This review evaluated the effectiveness of nerve grafting techniques for ED management after RP.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted using terms related to ED, nerve grafting, and cavernous nerve repair. From 239 initial studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on human subjects and reporting outcomes of unilateral or bilateral nerve grafting with autologous donor nerves, such as the sural and genitofemoral nerves.

Results: Bilateral sural nerve grafting demonstrated the highest recovery rates, with up to 71% of patients regaining erectile function sufficient for intercourse. Adjunctive therapies like sildenafil were frequently used to enhance outcomes. However, randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant improvements compared with controls, raising questions about the efficacy of nerve grafting. Variability in outcomes seemed to be influenced by donor nerve choice, surgical expertise, and patient characteristics, such as age and baseline function.

Conclusions: Although bilateral sural nerve grafting offers promising results, its overall efficacy is uncertain due to inconsistent findings and limitations of existing studies. Larger, standardized trials are essential to clarify its role in ED management after RP and to optimize patient outcomes.

根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍的神经修复:结果的系统回顾。
背景:勃起功能障碍(ED)是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后常见的并发症,由于海绵状神经损伤,在2-5年内影响高达89%的患者。神经移植被认为是恢复勃起功能的一种策略,但结果仍然不一致,随机对照试验产生了不同的结果。本文综述了神经移植技术在RP术后ED治疗中的有效性。方法:系统检索PubMed、MEDLINE和Embase数据库,检索ED、神经移植和海绵状神经修复相关术语。在239项初步研究中,17项符合纳入标准,重点是人类受试者,并报告了单侧或双侧神经移植自体供体神经(如腓肠和生殖股神经)的结果。结果:双侧腓肠神经移植显示出最高的恢复率,高达71%的患者恢复勃起功能,足以进行性交。辅助治疗如西地那非经常用于提高疗效。然而,随机对照试验显示,与对照组相比,没有统计学上的显著改善,这引起了对神经移植疗效的质疑。结果的可变性似乎受供体神经选择、手术专业知识和患者特征(如年龄和基线功能)的影响。结论:虽然双侧腓肠神经移植具有良好的效果,但由于研究结果不一致和现有研究的局限性,其整体疗效尚不确定。更大规模的标准化试验对于明确其在RP后ED管理中的作用和优化患者预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信