Edwin Chrabieh, Paul Beaineh, Towfik Sebai, Abdul Jabar Chekfa, Fadi Ghieh, Kareem Makkawi, Bishara Atiyeh, Bassel Bachir, Amir Ibrahim
{"title":"Nerve Repair for Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Outcomes.","authors":"Edwin Chrabieh, Paul Beaineh, Towfik Sebai, Abdul Jabar Chekfa, Fadi Ghieh, Kareem Makkawi, Bishara Atiyeh, Bassel Bachir, Amir Ibrahim","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent complication after radical prostatectomy (RP), affecting up to 89% of patients within 2-5 years due to cavernous nerve injury. Nerve grafting has been proposed as a strategy to restore erectile function, but outcomes remain inconsistent, and randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results. This review evaluated the effectiveness of nerve grafting techniques for ED management after RP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted using terms related to ED, nerve grafting, and cavernous nerve repair. From 239 initial studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on human subjects and reporting outcomes of unilateral or bilateral nerve grafting with autologous donor nerves, such as the sural and genitofemoral nerves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bilateral sural nerve grafting demonstrated the highest recovery rates, with up to 71% of patients regaining erectile function sufficient for intercourse. Adjunctive therapies like sildenafil were frequently used to enhance outcomes. However, randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant improvements compared with controls, raising questions about the efficacy of nerve grafting. Variability in outcomes seemed to be influenced by donor nerve choice, surgical expertise, and patient characteristics, such as age and baseline function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although bilateral sural nerve grafting offers promising results, its overall efficacy is uncertain due to inconsistent findings and limitations of existing studies. Larger, standardized trials are essential to clarify its role in ED management after RP and to optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 10","pages":"e7165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent complication after radical prostatectomy (RP), affecting up to 89% of patients within 2-5 years due to cavernous nerve injury. Nerve grafting has been proposed as a strategy to restore erectile function, but outcomes remain inconsistent, and randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results. This review evaluated the effectiveness of nerve grafting techniques for ED management after RP.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted using terms related to ED, nerve grafting, and cavernous nerve repair. From 239 initial studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on human subjects and reporting outcomes of unilateral or bilateral nerve grafting with autologous donor nerves, such as the sural and genitofemoral nerves.
Results: Bilateral sural nerve grafting demonstrated the highest recovery rates, with up to 71% of patients regaining erectile function sufficient for intercourse. Adjunctive therapies like sildenafil were frequently used to enhance outcomes. However, randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant improvements compared with controls, raising questions about the efficacy of nerve grafting. Variability in outcomes seemed to be influenced by donor nerve choice, surgical expertise, and patient characteristics, such as age and baseline function.
Conclusions: Although bilateral sural nerve grafting offers promising results, its overall efficacy is uncertain due to inconsistent findings and limitations of existing studies. Larger, standardized trials are essential to clarify its role in ED management after RP and to optimize patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.