Strong agreement between self-administered and interview-obtained bowel function score in patients with Hirschsprung disease and anorectal malformation.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Remi Andre Karlsen, Anders Telle Hoel, Kristin Bjørnland
{"title":"Strong agreement between self-administered and interview-obtained bowel function score in patients with Hirschsprung disease and anorectal malformation.","authors":"Remi Andre Karlsen, Anders Telle Hoel, Kristin Bjørnland","doi":"10.1007/s00383-025-06207-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Bowel Function Score (BFS) questionnaire is the most widely utilized tool for assessing bowel function in patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD) or anorectal malformation (ARM). However, the questionnaire has not undergone a formal validation process. This study aimed to compare self-administered responses with those obtained during clinical consultations to determine whether patients can reliably report their bowel function when completing the questionnaire independently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\"Patients with HD or ARM and/or with their parents, completed the BFS questionnaire prior to their outpatient clinic visit. During consultations, the questionnaires were reviewed, with any missing or unclear responses addressed and adjustments recorded. The agreement between self-administered and interview-obtained BFS scores was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 questionnaires with 721 answered questions were evaluated. The agreement between self-administered and interview-based BFS scores was found to be nearly perfect (ICC) 0.96. The question recording frequency of defecation, was the only item that did not demonstrate perfect agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the use of the self-administered BFS questionnaire as a reliable tool for assessing bowel function in HD and ARM patients in both clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06207-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Bowel Function Score (BFS) questionnaire is the most widely utilized tool for assessing bowel function in patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD) or anorectal malformation (ARM). However, the questionnaire has not undergone a formal validation process. This study aimed to compare self-administered responses with those obtained during clinical consultations to determine whether patients can reliably report their bowel function when completing the questionnaire independently.

Methods: "Patients with HD or ARM and/or with their parents, completed the BFS questionnaire prior to their outpatient clinic visit. During consultations, the questionnaires were reviewed, with any missing or unclear responses addressed and adjustments recorded. The agreement between self-administered and interview-obtained BFS scores was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)."

Results: A total of 103 questionnaires with 721 answered questions were evaluated. The agreement between self-administered and interview-based BFS scores was found to be nearly perfect (ICC) 0.96. The question recording frequency of defecation, was the only item that did not demonstrate perfect agreement.

Conclusion: This study supports the use of the self-administered BFS questionnaire as a reliable tool for assessing bowel function in HD and ARM patients in both clinical practice and research.

在巨结肠疾病和肛肠畸形患者中,自我管理和访谈获得的肠功能评分之间的强烈一致性。
背景:肠功能评分(BFS)问卷是评估巨结肠病(HD)或肛肠畸形(ARM)患者肠功能最广泛使用的工具。然而,问卷还没有经过正式的验证过程。本研究的目的是比较患者在独立完成问卷时的自我反馈和临床咨询时获得的反馈,以确定患者是否能够可靠地报告他们的肠道功能。方法:“HD或ARM患者和/或与其父母一起在门诊就诊前完成BFS问卷。在协商期间,审查了调查表,处理了任何遗漏或不清楚的答复,并记录了调整情况。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估自我管理和访谈获得的BFS评分之间的一致性。结果:共评估问卷103份,回答问题721个。自我管理的BFS分数和基于访谈的BFS分数之间的一致性几乎是完美的(ICC) 0.96。记录排便频率的问题是唯一没有表现出完全一致的项目。结论:本研究支持在临床实践和研究中使用自我给药BFS问卷作为评估HD和ARM患者肠道功能的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信