Machine learning-based non-invasive Parkinson's disease diagnostic model using clinical blood biomarkers.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jiaqi Han, Mengge Sun, Ji Yang, Yu An
{"title":"Machine learning-based non-invasive Parkinson's disease diagnostic model using clinical blood biomarkers.","authors":"Jiaqi Han, Mengge Sun, Ji Yang, Yu An","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08503-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parkinson's Disease (PD) diagnosis lacks effective non-invasive markers, complicating early detection and timely intervention. Machine learning (ML) combined with clinical blood biomarkers may provide a feasible approach for early diagnosis and monitoring.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to construct and validate a non-invasive diagnostic model for PD using machine learning and routine clinical blood biomarkers, and identify key biomarkers linked to disease severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 920 participants (428 PD and 492 non-PD) from two medical centers were included as training and validation sets. Biomarker selection was performed via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and stepwise regression. Five machine learning models-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), Naive Bayes (NB) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN)-were constructed and compared. The optimal model was interpreted using Shapley values (SHAP), and correlation with PD severity (Hoehn-Yahr stage) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SVM model demonstrated the best external validation performance (AUC = 0.916, recall = 0.949, F1-score = 0.843). SHAP analysis revealed superoxide dismutase (SOD) contributed the most to the model prediction, followed by gender and uric acid (UA). Furthermore, albumin (ALB) and SOD showed significant negative correlations with PD severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SVM-based diagnostic model effectively differentiates PD from controls using readily obtainable clinical biomarkers, offering promising clinical utility for PD screening, diagnosis, and progression monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08503-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's Disease (PD) diagnosis lacks effective non-invasive markers, complicating early detection and timely intervention. Machine learning (ML) combined with clinical blood biomarkers may provide a feasible approach for early diagnosis and monitoring.

Aim: This study aims to construct and validate a non-invasive diagnostic model for PD using machine learning and routine clinical blood biomarkers, and identify key biomarkers linked to disease severity.

Methods: A total of 920 participants (428 PD and 492 non-PD) from two medical centers were included as training and validation sets. Biomarker selection was performed via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and stepwise regression. Five machine learning models-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), Naive Bayes (NB) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN)-were constructed and compared. The optimal model was interpreted using Shapley values (SHAP), and correlation with PD severity (Hoehn-Yahr stage) was assessed.

Results: The SVM model demonstrated the best external validation performance (AUC = 0.916, recall = 0.949, F1-score = 0.843). SHAP analysis revealed superoxide dismutase (SOD) contributed the most to the model prediction, followed by gender and uric acid (UA). Furthermore, albumin (ALB) and SOD showed significant negative correlations with PD severity.

Conclusion: The SVM-based diagnostic model effectively differentiates PD from controls using readily obtainable clinical biomarkers, offering promising clinical utility for PD screening, diagnosis, and progression monitoring.

基于临床血液生物标志物的机器学习无创帕金森病诊断模型。
背景:帕金森病(PD)的诊断缺乏有效的非侵入性标志物,使早期发现和及时干预复杂化。机器学习(ML)与临床血液生物标志物的结合可能为早期诊断和监测提供可行的方法。目的:本研究旨在利用机器学习和常规临床血液生物标志物构建并验证PD的无创诊断模型,并确定与疾病严重程度相关的关键生物标志物。方法:从两个医疗中心共纳入920名参与者(428名PD和492名非PD)作为训练和验证集。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)和逐步回归进行生物标志物选择。构建并比较了逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(DT)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)和k近邻(KNN)五种机器学习模型。使用Shapley值(SHAP)解释最优模型,并评估与PD严重程度(Hoehn-Yahr分期)的相关性。结果:SVM模型具有最佳的外部验证性能(AUC = 0.916,召回率= 0.949,F1-score = 0.843)。SHAP分析显示,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)对模型预测的贡献最大,其次是性别和尿酸(UA)。此外,白蛋白(ALB)和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)与PD严重程度呈显著负相关。结论:基于支持向量机的诊断模型使用易于获得的临床生物标志物有效地将PD与对照组区分开来,为PD筛查、诊断和进展监测提供了有希望的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信