Safety and efficacy of a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath vs. a conventional intelligent pressure-control sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery for infection-related renal calculi.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jianrong Huang, Chuance Du, Qiliang Zhai, Hailin Luo, Xiaolong He
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath vs. a conventional intelligent pressure-control sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery for infection-related renal calculi.","authors":"Jianrong Huang, Chuance Du, Qiliang Zhai, Hailin Luo, Xiaolong He","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04783-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study attempts to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of a front-end flexible intelligent pressure-control ureteral access sheath (FT-IPC UAS) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for infection-related renal calculi. This research also aims to develop a predictive model for postoperative infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 124 patients with renal calculi were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the observation group (FT-IPC UAS) or the control group (conventional sheath). The primary endpoint was the 1-month stone-free rate (SFR). Intraoperative parameters, postoperative recovery outcomes, calculi-free rates, complication rates, and incidence of infection were compared. Logistic regression analysis was adopted to identify independent risk factors for postoperative infection. A multivariable prediction model was constructed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculi-free rate was also higher in the observation group, while the infection rate was markedly lower. The observation group demonstrated significantly shorter surgery time, lower peak perfusion pressure, improved surgical field visibility, and declined postoperative inflammatory markers (all p < 0.001). Patients in the observation group experienced faster recovery. Multivariate regression analysis identified procalcitonin (PCT) > 0.5 ng/mL as an independent risk factor for postoperative infection. The combined prediction model yielded an AUC of 0.8055, indicating good predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FT-IPC UAS enhances surgical efficiency, accelerates recovery, and reduces infection risk during RIRS. The predictive model incorporating PCT, sheath type, and surgery time offers reliable guidance for postoperative infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04783-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study attempts to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of a front-end flexible intelligent pressure-control ureteral access sheath (FT-IPC UAS) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for infection-related renal calculi. This research also aims to develop a predictive model for postoperative infection.

Methods: A total of 124 patients with renal calculi were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the observation group (FT-IPC UAS) or the control group (conventional sheath). The primary endpoint was the 1-month stone-free rate (SFR). Intraoperative parameters, postoperative recovery outcomes, calculi-free rates, complication rates, and incidence of infection were compared. Logistic regression analysis was adopted to identify independent risk factors for postoperative infection. A multivariable prediction model was constructed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.

Results: The calculi-free rate was also higher in the observation group, while the infection rate was markedly lower. The observation group demonstrated significantly shorter surgery time, lower peak perfusion pressure, improved surgical field visibility, and declined postoperative inflammatory markers (all p < 0.001). Patients in the observation group experienced faster recovery. Multivariate regression analysis identified procalcitonin (PCT) > 0.5 ng/mL as an independent risk factor for postoperative infection. The combined prediction model yielded an AUC of 0.8055, indicating good predictive performance.

Conclusions: The FT-IPC UAS enhances surgical efficiency, accelerates recovery, and reduces infection risk during RIRS. The predictive model incorporating PCT, sheath type, and surgery time offers reliable guidance for postoperative infection.

柔性可导航的输尿管吸引鞘与传统智能压力控制鞘在逆行肾内手术治疗感染相关性肾结石的安全性和有效性比较
背景:本研究旨在评估前端柔性智能压力控制输尿管通路鞘(FT-IPC UAS)在逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗感染相关性肾结石的临床性能和安全性。本研究还旨在建立术后感染的预测模型。方法:前瞻性纳入124例肾结石患者,按1:1的比例随机分为观察组(FT-IPC UAS)和对照组(常规护套)。主要终点是1个月无结石率(SFR)。比较术中参数、术后恢复情况、无结石率、并发症发生率和感染发生率。采用Logistic回归分析确定术后感染的独立危险因素。建立多变量预测模型,并采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)和Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验对其进行评估。结果:观察组无结石率明显高于对照组,感染率明显低于对照组。观察组手术时间明显缩短,灌注峰值压降低,手术视野能见度提高,术后炎症指标下降(p均为0.5 ng/mL),是术后感染的独立危险因素。联合预测模型的AUC为0.8055,预测效果良好。结论:FT-IPC UAS提高了RIRS手术效率,加速了恢复,降低了感染风险。结合PCT、鞘层类型和手术时间的预测模型为术后感染提供了可靠的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信