Is Burn Center Admission Necessary After Home Oxygen Ignition Injury?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Hope E Werenski, Anju Saraswat, James H Holmes, John K Bailey
{"title":"Is Burn Center Admission Necessary After Home Oxygen Ignition Injury?","authors":"Hope E Werenski, Anju Saraswat, James H Holmes, John K Bailey","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accidental ignition of home oxygen does not mandate emergent intubation, but due to the thermal component of the injury, patients are initially directed toward burn units. To identify potential benefit associated with admission to an American Burn Association (ABA) verified burn center, the local registry was queried from January 2016 through May 2022. Charts were inspected for additional data related to the pattern of the patient's injuries, comorbidities, and hospital course. We compared patients admitted to the burn service with those primarily cared for by non-burn services. A total of 48 adult patients admitted with burn injuries associated with home oxygen use. Of the 28 patients intubated on admission, 19 were managed by the burn service, and 9 by non-burn services. There were no differences in ventilator days, ICU days, total length of stay, or mortality. Of the 20 patients admitted without intubation, the burn service managed 7, and non-burn services managed 13. These two groups had no identified differences in ICU days, total length of stay, or mortality. This single-center review found no outcome differences between patients cared for in an ABA-verified burn center and those managed by non-burn services following home oxygen-related burn injury. Versus non-burn services for home oxygen ignition injury. Additionally, most intubated patient required only short-term ventilation, suggesting intubation may often be avoidable in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accidental ignition of home oxygen does not mandate emergent intubation, but due to the thermal component of the injury, patients are initially directed toward burn units. To identify potential benefit associated with admission to an American Burn Association (ABA) verified burn center, the local registry was queried from January 2016 through May 2022. Charts were inspected for additional data related to the pattern of the patient's injuries, comorbidities, and hospital course. We compared patients admitted to the burn service with those primarily cared for by non-burn services. A total of 48 adult patients admitted with burn injuries associated with home oxygen use. Of the 28 patients intubated on admission, 19 were managed by the burn service, and 9 by non-burn services. There were no differences in ventilator days, ICU days, total length of stay, or mortality. Of the 20 patients admitted without intubation, the burn service managed 7, and non-burn services managed 13. These two groups had no identified differences in ICU days, total length of stay, or mortality. This single-center review found no outcome differences between patients cared for in an ABA-verified burn center and those managed by non-burn services following home oxygen-related burn injury. Versus non-burn services for home oxygen ignition injury. Additionally, most intubated patient required only short-term ventilation, suggesting intubation may often be avoidable in this population.

家庭氧气点火伤后是否有必要入院烧伤中心?
意外点燃家用氧气不需要紧急插管,但由于损伤的热成分,患者最初被引导到烧伤单位。为了确定进入美国烧伤协会(ABA)认证的烧伤中心的潜在益处,从2016年1月到2022年5月对当地登记进行了查询。检查图表以获取与患者损伤模式、合并症和住院过程相关的其他数据。我们比较了接受烧伤服务的患者和主要接受非烧伤服务的患者。共有48名成年患者入院与家庭吸氧相关的烧伤。在入院时插管的28例患者中,19例由烧伤服务部门管理,9例由非烧伤服务部门管理。两组在呼吸机天数、ICU天数、总住院时间和死亡率方面均无差异。在未插管的20例患者中,烧伤服务管理7例,非烧伤服务管理13例。这两组在ICU天数、总住院时间或死亡率方面没有明显差异。本单中心综述发现,在aba认证的烧伤中心治疗的患者与在家庭氧相关烧伤后由非烧伤服务机构治疗的患者之间没有结果差异。相对于家庭氧气点火伤害的非烧伤服务。此外,大多数插管患者只需要短期通气,这表明在这一人群中插管通常是可以避免的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信